-
LSU beats KY on an offensive goal tending bucket as time expires...
SEC refs would not have allowed MSU a win over KY in that manner in a million years.
-
You're right, it would not have been good had it been us doing it, but it was good nevertheless. Good win by LSU.
-
Kentucky got screwed and I LOVE IT!!!!!!
-
I don't think they were screwed. Wasn't goal tending.
-

Originally Posted by
Dawg-gone-dawgs
Kentucky got screwed and I LOVE IT!!!!!!
How did they get screwed?
-
That was legit. But KY lost... what else matters??
-

Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
How did they get screwed?
If was offensive goal tending. Pretty obvious
-

Originally Posted by
Dawg-gone-dawgs
If was offensive goal tending. Pretty obvious
It definitely wasn't obvious.
-

Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
It definitely wasn't obvious.
So the ball can be in the cylinder and be messed with?
-

Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
It definitely wasn't obvious.
The only place that wasn’t offensive goal tending is Europe or Olympics.
-

Originally Posted by
Dawg-gone-dawgs
So the ball can be in the cylinder and be messed with?
I don't think it was in the cylinder. Really don't care. I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.
-

Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.
That was kind of my point but there are those in every crowd....
-

Originally Posted by
Dawg-gone-dawgs
That was kind of my point but there are those in every crowd....
Good talk.
-

Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
It definitely wasn't obvious.
Yes. It was as obvious as the PI in the rams saints game.
-

Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
I don't think it was in the cylinder. Really don't care. I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.
It?s not a matter of you thinking it was or it was not. Facts and video dont lie, no matter how much you want to think something was.
-

Originally Posted by
RougeDawg
Yes. It was as obvious as the PI in the rams saints game.
It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?t
-

Originally Posted by
MrKotter
It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?t
If you don't think that was goaltending you are either blind or do not know the rule. It was textbook goaltending.
-

Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
I don't think it was in the cylinder. Really don't care. I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.
Good grief, some of you people just want to argue. I'm glad to see KY get beat also but that ball was pushed back in with nearly half the ball still in the cylinder. OBVIOUS goaltend per the rules that would have been called if we had done that especially against KY.
-

Originally Posted by
MrKotter
It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?t
I have an optometrist I can recommend.
-
It was offensive basket interference because it was still in the cylinder but they couldn’t review that. They could only review that he touched it before the clock expired.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.