Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 57

Thread: Potential new MLB rules

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    5,691
    vCash
    3621
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I love the long season.
    The 1920 season...

    No silly divisions, just 8 and 8 with a long season

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1920...aseball_season

  2. #22
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,797
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
    The sport will wither and die on its current trajectory. Three true outcomes may be the most efficient mechanism right now but it results in a boring game of standing around. It’s incentivized further by the overshift. The game will slowly fade into more obscurity without incentivizing balls in play. That’s the bottom line.

    Add DH
    Ban infield shifts
    Ban one batter specialists
    Lower mound - hell move the thing back to 61’ while we’re at it

    All of these work to to produce a better product AND game. Singles should be singles not lineouts to the 2B playing 40 feet into RF.


    I would also LOVE for the minor league system to somehow be transformed to a relegation type setup. Four AAA teams rise each year to the big leagues. 2 AL and 2 NL. It would revamp the entire minor league system but would expand interest in the sport all over America.
    Wither and die?

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...ion/890041001/

    Attendance down, yet revenue is up

  3. #23
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,425
    vCash
    2610
    You want to get rid of the shift? Tell players to grow nuts and bunt against it. They refuse to do it. Teach guys how to hit the ball.

    We want more action according to some, but they mean homers. They want more homers and that what we are getting. Unfortunately to get that you have to increase strikeouts and that's what we get too. We don't have guys hitting 50 anymore but we've got a bunch of guys hitting 15-20 now. Boom or bust is what's been created.

  4. #24
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,837
    vCash
    52060
    The "original rules" argument doesn't hold much water either, since the rules are drastically different today than they were in the 1860s in areas way beyond the DH.

  5. #25
    Senior Member fader2103's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,385
    vCash
    3116
    I say eliminate the DH in both leagues. I'm a fan of small ball and like the chess match it brings with you deciding to put down a bunt. Give the hitter the green light or sub in.

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    48
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by MetEdDawg View Post
    You want to get rid of the shift? Tell players to grow nuts and bunt against it. They refuse to do it. Teach guys how to hit the ball.

    We want more action according to some, but they mean homers. They want more homers and that what we are getting. Unfortunately to get that you have to increase strikeouts and that's what we get too. We don't have guys hitting 50 anymore but we've got a bunch of guys hitting 15-20 now. Boom or bust is what's been created.
    Boom or Bust is boring. MLB is becoming more and more irrelevant. Lower the mound, back it up six inches, and kill the shift. Keep low seams to reduce movement on pitches but deaden the ball just a tad so it pays more to hit line drives than fly out to the warning track. We need balls in play..Action... College has the right balance now.

    Get radical. Make an inning 4 outs instead of three.

    The nba added a three point line. Radical. They need to follow the Colin Cowherd idea and have the line go out on the side of the court and eliminate the corner 3.
    Last edited by Spectre; 02-10-2019 at 01:31 PM.

  7. #27
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,837
    vCash
    52060
    I was a sub-.100 hitter my last year of Little League and even I could lay down a bunt in the general direction I wanted to. If hitters don't want to be shifted against, all they have to do it prove that they can regularly hit it to the spots of the field that are left open.

    Should football defenses be required to cover the field evenly rather than focusing on spots where the QB is most likely to throw it? Of course not, and the same principle applies to baseball defenses.

  8. #28
    Senior Member BoomBoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Coast
    Posts
    11,444
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    1. There is talk of a universal DH in both leagues. Personally I like the fact that pitchers hit in one league and not the other but this wouldn't bother me. My idea is to let pitchers hit and have a DH- so 10 in the batting order. And let MLB teams can pick any pitcher to hit whether he is playing or not or has been subbed out.


    2. There is talk of lowering the mound or moving the mound further back. Thanks Jordan Hicks, Aroldis Chapman, and Justin Verlander.** I don't really like this rule. I like watching pitchers dominate some.


    3. Pitchers would have to pitch to three batters at a minimum. So- no more LOOGY throws one pitch and gets a LH hitter out and then bring in someone else. Really would change strategy- of course relief pitchers that have closer splits would be valued more than ever. I think this could lead to more intentional walks potentially. Like- have a LHP throw to a LH hitter, IWBB RH hitter and then come back and throw to a LH hitter. The main intent is to minimize pitching changes leading to shorter game times and more offense. Again- not wild about this. You should be able to use players as you see fit.

    4. Expanding rosters from 25 to 26. I LIKE this. Personally I'd expand it to 28.

    5. Talk about changing how service time is calculated. This NEEDS to be done. Teams are keeping good players in the minors so that they can save money down the road. Which honestly sucks for the player and the fans. See Hunter Renfroe. Like the talk here.

    Basically MLB is trying to shorten games and create more offense. I say legalize steroids and let's have 1998 but now with pitchers throwing 105 MPH.

    I also hope to see MLB expand to Montreal and Las Vegas.
    Allow the DH, but shift the rules against it enough that a good hitting pitcher would be preferable to using an average DH. At a minimum, make the DH bat ninth. Shift it back to being for hitters to have a day off from the field, and away from professional DHs. Maybe go even further, like 3 balls to a pitcher is a walk, 2 strikes to a DH is a K. A pitcher gets an extra base after a hit.

  9. #29
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,041
    vCash
    3100
    As regards to the shift, you don’t even have to bunt to beat it (even though players suck at it in today’s game because they don’t spend time on it) but you don’t have to pull everything close to the strike zone. Teams don’t even have to try and work middle in to a hitter to make sure they pull it. The constantly work away to a pull shift because a lot of hitters don’t hit oppo. Even commentators talk about this in games a lot. Drive a ball oppo enough and the make them pay for shifts.

  10. #30
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,041
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    I think they want even more offense though. Just about every rule is aimed at that. Home runs did go down by about 500 last year. Not really enough to be a trend- sure. But I think MLB is wanting McGwire/Sosa/Bonds type seasons from players now that they game is "cleaned up".
    It was still very high. The 3 of the 4 highest HR totals in history were 2017, 2016, and 2018. (In order with 2000 as the second most). It?s already turned as far as HR the last 3 years.

  11. #31
    Senior Member WeWonItAll(Most)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    2,791
    vCash
    6163
    Quote Originally Posted by The Federalist Engineer View Post
    Too many teams is the problem. Not the game itself. It's a crazy idea but shorten the season to 100 games and have MLB1 and MLB2 where the worst 2 teams auto drop to MLB2 and 3rd and 4th play in a survival playoff

    Getting dropped creates serious survival drama
    The fight to avoid relegation in European soccer creates almost the same level of entertainment when watching two of the worst teams in the league play as watching the two teams fighting for the championship. It'll never happen, but it would be nice to force the likes of the Marlins to not be able to just pack it in and call it a season 30 games in every year.

    If you want to get really radical, there's basically already a 4 level pyramid in professional baseball. Imagine the MS Braves at least having the potential to able to work their way up to the MLB. Again, will never happen, but its fun to play with.
    Far Moorhead yaw

  12. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    48
    vCash
    3000
    We are almost to the point where 1/4 of at bats ends in a K. A bunch of .230, 25 HR, 175 K hitters makes for a horrible product.

  13. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    5,691
    vCash
    3621
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
    We are almost to the point where 1/4 of at bats ends in a K. A bunch of .230, 25 HR, 175 K hitters makes for a horrible product.
    It's a Dan Uggla league ... Mark Lemke is extinct

    Lemke struckout 348 times in 11 wonderful years of production...a piece of work like Uggla has stuckout 1348 in 10 years with half that time as a journeyman

  14. #34
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,087
    vCash
    52714
    Baseball is going to kill itself while trying to increase offensive numbers. They don’t realize most fans like the game for things other than the HR. When it becomes the NBA on a diamond I’m done with it. Especially when Bonds and Raffy etc. are banned for basically doing the same thing.
    Let’s hit HRs and score a lot, but ban the guys that hit HRs and drove in runs and call them cheaters. MLB is trying to cheat the fans.

  15. #35
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,797
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by The Federalist Engineer View Post
    It's a Dan Uggla league ... Mark Lemke is extinct

    Lemke struckout 348 times in 11 wonderful years of production...a piece of work like Uggla has stuckout 1348 in 10 years with half that time as a journeyman
    Dan uggla was a much better player than lemke.

    Lemke career slash line: .246/.317/.324
    Uggla: .241/.336/.447

    fWAR...
    Lemke 7.0 over 11 seasons ~ 0.64 per season
    Uggla 23.4 over 10 seasons ~ 2.34 per season

  16. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    48
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    Baseball is going to kill itself while trying to increase offensive numbers. They don’t realize most fans like the game for things other than the HR. When it becomes the NBA on a diamond I’m done with it. Especially when Bonds and Raffy etc. are banned for basically doing the same thing.
    Let’s hit HRs and score a lot, but ban the guys that hit HRs and drove in runs and call them cheaters. MLB is trying to cheat the fans.
    I think you can increase scoring AND make for a more exciting product. Let’s discuss things that seem way out there, but could juice excitement back into the game.

    Reduce the defense to 8 players

    Make the game 4 outs per inning rather than 3, but a strikeout counts for 2 outs.

    Lower the mound a bit and move it to 61’.

  17. #37
    Senior Member IMissJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,103
    vCash
    3100
    I don't see how more offense leads to shorter games. If anything, more offense will just cause me to watch less. The fastest games I've ever seen are all pitcher dominated.

  18. #38
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,837
    vCash
    52060
    How about don't do anything radical to the game other than enforce a clock between pitches and innings? And I guess the DH for the National League is fine, but mainly for competitive reasons - during Interleague Play, the AL has a 9th everyday player that the NL doesn't have, and I don't like the imbalance.

    I brainstormed one time maybe if a batter strikes out for the 3rd time in a game, he's ejected. I don't necessarily advocate it, but it would be interesting to see an Independent League try it and see if/how it changes things.

  19. #39
    Zone Blocking Specialist coachnorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    716
    vCash
    3100
    Baseball is probably aware of its crossroads. The young will not accept the game and its traditions because it is slow and boring because of its slowness. The old have accepted baseball's traditions and hold on. There is now a conflict of interest between the generations and the traditionalist are dieing off because of old age. Baseball just wants the money which means commercials which causes interruptions and the young will not tolerate this so hard decisions have to be made. To sustain itself baseball has to accommodate the young. Because of baseball not moving in a timely manner, a generation has turned its back on the game. Baseball better speed up the pitchers and ban the batters from leaving the box in additions to others things that breach traditional baseball or be be prepared for a bad future.

  20. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    528
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
    We are almost to the point where 1/4 of at bats ends in a K. A bunch of .230, 25 HR, 175 K hitters makes for a horrible product.
    I 100% agree with this, the fact that Bryce Harper is about to get a huge contract when he hit .217 last year is cause of a horrible product.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.