Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: Mizzou Gets Post-Season Ban for 2019. Kelly Bryant?

  1. #1
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700

    Mizzou Gets Post-Season Ban for 2019. Kelly Bryant?

    Am I reading this right? What happens to Kelly Bryant?

    [tweet]https://twitter.com/DanWolken/status/1091020278967214081[/tweet]
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  2. #2
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Guess he will sit at home like the rest of them.

  3. #3
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Guess he will sit at home like the rest of them.
    I bet the NCAA allows him to transfer immediately.

    Completely unfair to him & now he'll have an issue going through Spring practice.
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  4. #4
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    I bet the NCAA allows him to transfer immediately.

    Completely unfair to him & now he'll have an issue going through Spring practice.
    Maybe. If the kid cared much about bowl games though, why'd he choose mizzou? Mizzou has a history of putting QBs in the nfl, and I bet this is why he went there. He no nfl QB though

  5. #5
    Senior Member Matty Dispatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    407
    vCash
    3100
    If he skipped out on a national championship team then he's got two eyes squarely on the NFL, so there's probably a decent enough chance he'd skip the bowl game anyway.....which at Mizzou most likely would not have been a NY6....so I can't imagine him altering his decision apart from Dooley or some of the receivers jumping ship.

  6. #6
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    What I don't understand is that Mizzou basically got the same punishment as Ole Miss when doing far less. UNC basically did the same thing right? And got no penalty
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    1,009
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    What I don't understand is that Mizzou basically got the same punishment as Ole Miss when doing far less. UNC basically did the same thing right? And got no penalty
    Repeat offender status. They just had major NCAA sanctions for men’s basketball two years ago.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,947
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    What I don't understand is that Mizzou basically got the same punishment as Ole Miss when doing far less. UNC basically did the same thing right? And got no penalty
    According to UNC, it had sham classes that were available to everybody. That seems believable to me as there are a lot of sham classes at most universities. There's were just particularly egregious because you supposedly didn't even have to show up or do any coursework.

    Mizzou had a tutor doing work for football players. That's a benefit specifically to athletes.

    This is only one bowl as opposed to two, so it is not what Ole Miss got, but if you ignore the pain of the investigation, it seems crazy that they got a bowl ban for this.

    ETA: Read through and the penalties are way harsher than I realized. Guess it makes sense if it's for repeat offender status.
    Last edited by Johnson85; 01-31-2019 at 12:33 PM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,044
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    What I don't understand is that Mizzou basically got the same punishment as Ole Miss when doing far less. UNC basically did the same thing right? And got no penalty
    Mizzou is under repeat offender. This tutor blew the whistle less than a year after the basketball team got put on probation. That made the penalties worse. And the school administration instructed the fraud as well.

    UNC is way to deep to get into, and I don’t necessarily agree with the NCAA’s decision. But I do understand a big issues that was going to be litigated, that class was open to everyone. Everyone got the same benifit, athlete or not. And you can make a case that losing status with accreditation did as much to hurt the school as what the NCAA might have done. Still think some sort of sanctions was in order but that was a complicated deal.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    5,037
    vCash
    3200
    This is a classic example of the NCAA hitting a school that doesn't make enough money for the NCAA.

    This always scares the shit out of me, because if you think the NCAA wouldn't make an example out of us, youre nuts.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Beaver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    636
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    What I don't understand is that Mizzou basically got the same punishment as Ole Miss when doing far less. UNC basically did the same thing right? And got no penalty
    Yeahhhh this is crazy. It was literally one tutor that the NCAA found to have acted alone. She did class work for 12 athletes. And they got post season bans for 3 sports! Also scholly reductions, official/unofficial visit restrictions, and vacated records for games the athletes participated in... At least the tutor got a 10 year show cause**

  12. #12
    Senior Member deadheaddawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,248
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by HancockCountyDog View Post
    This is a classic example of the NCAA hitting a school that doesn't make enough money for the NCAA.

    This always scares the shit out of me, because if you think the NCAA wouldn't make an example out of us, youre nuts.
    So does that mean ole miss got hit hard or ole Miss didn't get hit hard because they make the NCAA a lot of money

  13. #13
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Forget Bryant, will the ncaa let Jonathan Johnson (wr), Cale Garrett (lb), and Crockett (RB) transfer? All juniors and all very good players

  14. #14
    Senior Member Beaver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    636
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Really Clark? View Post
    Mizzou is under repeat offender. This tutor blew the whistle less than a year after the basketball team got put on probation. That made the penalties worse. And the school administration instructed the fraud as well.
    Ah, repeat offender. That makes more sense. However, NCAA says tutor “felt pressured” but was not directly told to help the students.

  15. #15
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,425
    vCash
    2610
    This should allow Kelly Bryant and any other senior to transfer and be immediately eligible correct?

  16. #16
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by MetEdDawg View Post
    This should allow Kelly Bryant and any other senior to transfer and be immediately eligible correct?
    I'd rather have Johnson and Garrett than Bryant

  17. #17
    Senior Member Ari Gold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    West coast
    Posts
    4,734
    vCash
    3100
    Dear Mizzu
    On behave of all the other SEC schools ... go back to the BIG12 .

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    5,037
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by deadheaddawg View Post
    So does that mean ole miss got hit hard or ole Miss didn't get hit hard because they make the NCAA a lot of money
    Wake me the next time they are bowl eligible and then you decide if they got hit hard or not.

    Remember - the confederates it wasn't the sanction that killed them it was the process.

  19. #19
    Denver Airport Director
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    13,471
    vCash
    2610
    Hahahahahahahaha **** Bryant. He ****ed up. He should have listened to us. Have fun watching football on tv in December and January.
    Last edited by I seen it dawg; 01-31-2019 at 12:41 PM.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    10,496
    vCash
    3200
    Maybe he can re-enter the porta potty.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.