View Poll Results: Is it time to expand the CFP to 8 teams?

Voters
38. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    32 84.21%
  • No

    6 15.79%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: CFP Expansion.....

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Memphis Metro Area
    Posts
    1,970
    vCash
    3100

    CFP Expansion.....

    ...

  2. #2
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,245
    vCash
    1000619
    I voted "Nay", but I would LOVE IT if they went to 8 teams...
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Memphis Metro Area
    Posts
    1,970
    vCash
    3100
    Most of my BAMA friends prefer to keep it at 4 teams......and that's easy to see why. 8 teams would help MSU and a few others who can't quite get to that top 4 level and stay there. 8 teams opens it up to more competition for BAMA and the teams who frequent the top 4. I was just curious to see what most MSU posters thought.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,512
    vCash
    3700
    I think expanding to eight is inevitable.

    How I hope they do it is the playoff 8 play four games around Christmas.

    Then the Final four on or around NYD

    Then the Championship at the same time as they do now.

    I also hope that they expand the NY6 bowls to the NY8 and add the Citrus and another bowl like say maybe the Alamo Bowl to the current and rotate the playoff 8 between the NY8 bowls. Then have the Final Four at neutral sites and the championship at a neutral site.

  5. #5
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,245
    vCash
    1000619
    As a selfish, rat bastard Bammer, I'd like an 8 team playoff (provided all bids are "at large")...

    It'd provide a greater margin of error for top tier teams.... JMO
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  6. #6
    Senior Member BulldogBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The Maxyard
    Posts
    10,354
    vCash
    44696
    I am against it 100%.

    But with that said Todd is probably right on it being inevitable. They are already set up for it and probably also know it's going to happen eventually. And no, they don't have to add bowls. Round of 8 uses four NY6. Semis uses the other two. Then a NT game like they have now. If this is not how they're planning to do it then they should.

    Then they can justify adding a few more bowls also.
    The Liberation will not be televised--- when it arrives like lightning in the skies!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,376
    vCash
    2610
    I don't see how the #8 team can make a legitimate argument for having a shot at the title. If people can't make a solid case for differentiating #4 and #5, imagine trying to split hairs between who gets left out at #8 and #9.
    Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.

  8. #8
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Leroy Jenkins View Post
    I don't see how the #8 team can make a legitimate argument for having a shot at the title. If people can't make a solid case for differentiating #4 and #5, imagine trying to split hairs between who gets left out at #8 and #9.
    Power 5 champs, top out of power 5 conference champ, and top 2 at large according to a computer metric like bcs (kinks worked out)

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,376
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Power 5 champs, top out of power 5 conference champ, and top 2 at large according to a computer metric like bcs (kinks worked out)
    So you want 12? Nah, no communist football for me. No way a #12 team can make a claim they deserve a shot.

    4 is good.
    Last edited by Leroy Jenkins; 11-25-2018 at 11:22 AM.
    Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pocahontas, Mississippi
    Posts
    11,648
    vCash
    1540588
    It should have been 8 from the beginning and leave it at 8. Most of us already knew that. But whatever. The “experts” are always a little slow.

  11. #11
    Senior Member LC Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    6,089
    vCash
    4938
    Make it 8 with the 1st round on campuses so late season games will still have meaning because they are for seeding.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,984
    vCash
    3200
    I would love a 16 team playoff although I realize not that feasible.

    Bottom line is College Game Day would usually go to a matchup between any of the top 16 ranked teams. If you can't see or enjoy the entertainment value in that many damn good games then do you even like college football?

    Also it would make it much more accessible for success for teams like MSU. Even with 8 we ain't threatening very often at all. Let's be real, CFB is a rich get richer system, sometimes when we are playing for the Gator Bowl instead of the Liberty Bowl I wonder why I am a fan.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,376
    vCash
    2610
    We already have a playoff that encompasses all the teams in FBS. It's called the regular season. Win and you are in, I dont even know what to say to a person who wants to lower the bar until 8-12 teams get a chance at the championship, regardless of where they finished the year.
    Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    8,831
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Leroy Jenkins View Post
    So you want 12? Nah, no communist football for me. No way a #12 team can make a claim they deserve a shot.

    4 is good.
    NFL has 12 with fewer teams. I'm for expanding to 8 at least. Then schedule strength (or lack thereof) won't hinder teams from having a very strong schedule and losing 1 maybe 2 vs very weak schedule going undefeated.

  15. #15
    Senior Member WeWonItAll(Most)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    2,791
    vCash
    6163
    Quote Originally Posted by Leroy Jenkins View Post
    So you want 12? Nah, no communist football for me. No way a #12 team can make a claim they deserve a shot.

    4 is good.
    5+1+2=8 comrade

  16. #16
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Delete

  17. #17
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by WeWonItAll(Most) View Post
    5+1+2=8 comrade
    Thanks. Thought I worded it correctly

  18. #18
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,844
    vCash
    52060
    Either Oklahoma or Ohio State will likely be left out at 12-1, and if Alabama loses they both probably will, so it seems obvious that there aren't enough slots.

    8 is almost certainly enough though unless we get more than 5 power conferences

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,376
    vCash
    2610
    Gotcha. It was strangely worded. I read it as, power 5 champs + 5 best conf champs from non-power 5, +2 at large=12

    Quote Originally Posted by WeWonItAll(Most) View Post
    5+1+2=8 comrade
    Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.

  20. #20
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Leroy Jenkins View Post
    Gotcha. It was strangely worded. I read it as, power 5 champs + 5 best conf champs from non-power 5, +2 at large=12
    That would definetely be socialist football lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.