-
-
-
LOL!!
Hobby Lobby Bitches!!
-
-
Originally Posted by
Liverpooldawg
GOTHOM1!
I'm glad OM lost.....but that last TD by Brown looked like a TD to me. I thought he had solid possession of the ball when he fell in the end zone. Had that been us...….I would have gone ballistic.
-
Originally Posted by
Pit Bull
I'm glad OM lost.....but that last TD by Brown looked like a TD to me. I thought he had solid possession of the ball when he fell in the end zone. Had that been us...….I would have gone ballistic.
By rule it's incomplete, by common sense it's a catch. Karma catching up a little with the bears
-
Lodge and Phillips will be gimpy. 5-0 is a little gimpy. I just hope Abram can stay in the game cause he’s going to bring the pain.
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
By rule it's incomplete, by common sense it's a catch. Karma catching up a little with the bears
What's the rule that makes it incomplete?
-
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
Lodge and Phillips will be gimpy. 5-0 is a little gimpy. I just hope Abram can stay in the game cause he?s going to bring the pain.
Yeah they got some guys hurting. I think 5-0 in for a long long night!
ETA Rawlings hurt too
-
Originally Posted by
the_real_MSU_is_us
What's the rule that makes it incomplete?
He didn't survive the ground. If you go to the ground in the process of making a catch you have to control the ball all the way through. AJ didbt maintain control, incomplete pass correct call. I called it as soon as it happened
-
Some Ole Miss fans were laughing at us getting screwed by the refs last week.
Not so funny now, is it?
-
Originally Posted by
Pit Bull
I'm glad OM lost.....but that last TD by Brown looked like a TD to me. I thought he had solid possession of the ball when he fell in the end zone. Had that been us...….I would have gone ballistic.
Of course it does, to you. I hate the dang rule. But as it stands now that was an incomplete pass. If the Vandy defender had had his feet in bounds it would have been an INT. To me if the ground can't cause a fumble it shouldnt cause an incomplete pass. The rule as it stands now says the ground CAN cause an incomplete pass. Replay got that right as the rule is now.
-
Originally Posted by
Liverpooldawg
Of course it does, to you. I hate the dang rule. But as it stands now that was an incomplete pass. If the Vandy defender had had his feet in bounds it would have been an INT. To me if the ground can't cause a fumble it shouldnt cause an incomplete pass. The rule as it stands now says the ground CAN cause an incomplete pass. Replay got that right as the rule is now.
Exactly. The rule is stupid but that's the way it is. As soon as it happened I said it was incomplete. I've seen this called incomplete a gazillon Times. They got the call right.
-
I think I just saw Kevin Sumlin take a shot of Grey Goose....
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Originally Posted by
TUSK
I think I just saw Kevin Sumlin take a shot of Grey Goose....
Nah, it was more like a bottle.
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
He didn't survive the ground. If you go to the ground in the process of making a catch you have to control the ball all the way through. AJ didbt maintain control, incomplete pass correct call. I called it as soon as it happened
It thought it was a int... Unless you can't catch the ball lying on you're back. But I can see the incomplete, because the ball did move
-
Anchor down makes no sense.. You don't want to move on from your level of mediocrity Vandy???
-
Old Miss is Old Missing again.
-
Originally Posted by
BhamDawg205
It thought it was a int... Unless you can't catch the ball lying on you're back. But I can see the incomplete, because the ball did move
I thought so too but they said his feet were out. I couldn't tell from the view they showed where his feet were
-
Originally Posted by
Liverpooldawg
Of course it does, to you. I hate the dang rule. But as it stands now that was an incomplete pass. If the Vandy defender had had his feet in bounds it would have been an INT. To me if the ground can't cause a fumble it shouldnt cause an incomplete pass. The rule as it stands now says the ground CAN cause an incomplete pass. Replay got that right as the rule is now.
That's because you're a troll and not a real Mississippi State fan.. A real Mississippi State fan would never admit that AJ caught that ball.. troll
Sorry. You deserve it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote
