-
Senior Member
Is SEC football going to 9 games?
Sounds like most coaches are against it.
http://coachingsearch.com/home/3059-...ence-games.pdf
Presidents are the voters, but I think they listen to the coaches.
-

Originally Posted by
FlabLoser
This would be bad for teams like us scraping for wins most years and teams that are in national championship contention.
-
9 conference games means more chances to lose- and the coaches know this
They dont want to give up a certain win for chance to lose- but the Presidents dont always listen to the coaches
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
People don't realize it -- but a 9-game conference schedule actually gives the SEC less inventory for it's channel by 7 or 8 games, I think -- since we are playing each other more thus making for fewer overall games. The "cure" for that problem is to go to a 13 game overall schedule with 9-game conference schedules.
The major opponents are Georgia and Florida -- who play a neutral site SEC game every year and have permanent home and home OOC games(against FSU and Ga Tech). This would essentially destroy the number of home game opportunities for them every other year -- and severely limit the amount of marquee away or neutral site games they could ever play in the future...
-
Senior Member

Originally Posted by
engie
People don't realize it -- but a 9-game conference schedule actually gives the SEC less inventory for it's channel by 7 or 8 games, I think -- since we are playing each other more thus making for fewer overall games. The "cure" for that problem is to go to a 13 game overall schedule with 9-game conference schedules.
The major opponents are Georgia and Florida -- who play a neutral site SEC game every year and have permanent home and home OOC games(against FSU and Ga Tech). This would essentially destroy the number of home game opportunities for them every other year -- and severely limit the amount of marquee away or neutral site games they could ever play in the future...
I read that somewhere else yesterday. With the SEC Network starting, I don't see us deciding to play fewer SEC games.
I know other conferences are whining and wanting all conference to play an "equal" number of conference games.
The problem is that all conferences are not equal in competitiveness.
I don't see us going to a 9-game conference schedule in the near future. Maybe later, but not right now.
-
Senior Member
ESPN has the purse strings, and they will want more conference games for TV and he SEC network, so you can expect it to come sooner than later. The coaches made it clear that this isn't something they want, but it is out of their hands. It's all about the money now.
-

Originally Posted by
slickdawg
ESPN has the purse strings, and they will want more conference games for TV and he SEC network, so you can expect it to come sooner than later. The coaches made it clear that this isn't something they want, but it is out of their hands. It's all about the money now.
ESPN may own the Network -- but the SEC retained 100% of the content rights. Basically, there is a 50% and 50% content committee on what actually gets shown -- where we each break the tie every other time. It's a partnership -- not an ownership.
I'd look for ESPN to put more pressure on scheduling agreements with other major conferences for marquee OOC games than the 9-game model which actually decreases their overall inventory...
-
Senior Member
I'll be ok with 9 games after the playoff expands.
-
Senior Member
If I am ESPN, I want 8 games and a number of SEC-BCS conference matchups for week 1 or week 2. Like Bama-Michigan, Auburn-USC, MSU-OSU, etc
Gotta give the rest of the country a reason to be interested in the SEC.
-

Originally Posted by
engie
People don't realize it -- but a 9-game conference schedule actually gives the SEC less inventory for it's channel by 7 or 8 games, I think -- since we are playing each other more thus making for fewer overall games. The "cure" for that problem is to go to a 13 game overall schedule with 9-game conference schedules.
The major opponents are Georgia and Florida -- who play a neutral site SEC game every year and have permanent home and home OOC games(against FSU and Ga Tech). This would essentially destroy the number of home game opportunities for them every other year -- and severely limit the amount of marquee away or neutral site games they could ever play in the future...
Which means more pre-season bowls like the one we are about to play in with Oklahoma State.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.