Nowhere in Godfrey article does he state that the transcripts, which he cites throughout his article, reveal that LL identified MSU as the other school which paid him. To the contrary, his article states that the other school identified by LL is redacted in the original transcripts. He goes on to say OM sent the NCAA a letter earlier this month alleging that information has surfaced that leads om to believe the other school identified by LL is MSU. Notably, Godfrey does not state what the alleged new information is or identify any documents related to the alleged new information. There is a reason om/attorneys didn't leak this alleged new info to Godfrey.

By the time mcreadys article comes out 2 hours later, he states as a fact, citing Godfreys article, that MSU is the other school that paid MSU.

This is the new narrative. That LL admitted we paid him too.

Maybe he did. I have no clue if he did. The point is, there has been no evidence produced that he did. The only evidence to support he did is om alleging it in a letter to the NCAA earlier this month, claiming new information has surfaced that leads om to believe the redacted school is MSU.

I'm not on a high horse proclaiming we didn't pay him, but forgive me for not just taking om's word for it without any evidence.