Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
I don't think they would be a bottom feeder at first, but they would over time. They simply don't have the local recruiting base to keep up, and, once they started losing games, they wouldn't be able to draw kids from southern California.

Boise has less resources than any SEC school, a worse local recruiting base than any SEC school, and less money than any SEC school. Give me one reason why they wouldn't be an SEC bottom feeder within 5 years of joining our conference. There must be a bridge, because winning doesn't happen by accident.
Yeah, I'm not gonna argue this based on a bunch of made up assumptions or premises. All I'm saying is 2002 to 2012 Boise St would've done well in any conference. They were damn good. Good enough to win the SEC? No one will ever know. Good enough to pound the likes of Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Croom MSU, ole miss, etc? It's laughable that that's even a question.