Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Parrish Alford says "Buchanan more accurate than Kelly...

  1. #1
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,689
    vCash
    3002900

    Parrish Alford says "Buchanan more accurate than Kelly...

    but Kelly has more Swagger".

    That scares me if I'm Ole Miss.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Denver Airport Director
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    13,471
    vCash
    2610
    Love me some swag

  3. #3
    Senior Member BrunswickDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Home of Slay, GA
    Posts
    12,304
    vCash
    1746501

  4. #4
    Senior Member thf24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,543
    vCash
    3200
    Nope, all is well. If I were one of them, it would only scare me if Kelly DIDN'T have more swagger.**

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Lafayette, La
    Posts
    3,048
    vCash
    2620
    Quote Originally Posted by I seen it dawg View Post
    Love me some swag
    Most important factor in winning games is swag. I would go with Kelly. Natty is gonna be a cake walk for them

  6. #6
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,689
    vCash
    3002900
    He also says Rod Taylor will be back for Bama, which means they will have 2 first year starters on the O-Line, in Taylor and Patterson, when they go to Bama. So they'll have Taylor at RG, Patterson at LG, a new Center (forgot his name), and a new QB....AT TUSCALOOSA. That could end very badly for the Bears.

  7. #7
    Denver Airport Director
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    13,471
    vCash
    2610
    Zero reason they shouldn't win every game with all the pieces they have in place.

  8. #8
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,689
    vCash
    3002900
    Ha, he said they will actually "be better on defense". Yea right.

    And listen to this..."Bridges and Shepard are so good, it's given them the luxury of putting Hilton at Safety."

    I hope they fall flat on their face this year, so I can tweet Parrish all of his idiotic quotes. Bridges and Shepard have yet to play a SEC snap.

  9. #9
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    He also says Rod Taylor will be back for Bama, which means they will have 2 first year starters on the O-Line, in Taylor and Patterson, when they go to Bama. So they'll have Taylor at RG, Patterson at LG, a new Center (forgot his name), and a new QB....AT TUSCALOOSA. That could end very badly for the Bears.
    Give me Taylor and Patterson vs a'shawn Robinson and Jonathan Allen any day**

  10. #10
    Senior Member thf24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,543
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Bridges and Shepard have yet to play a SEC snap.
    Shepard may have all the talent in the world, but I'll believe that a hearing-impaired individual can be a 100% effective D1 football DB when I see it.

  11. #11
    Senior Member starkvegasdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Eye of the Storm
    Posts
    22,947
    vCash
    3275
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    but Kelly has more Swagger".

    That scares me if I'm Ole Miss.

    Thoughts?
    Kelly has the one thing that will push him to starter status at TSUN...a criminal record. If Buchanan wants to see meaningful snaps he better get to work on that rap sheet. He's two arrests and a trip to Haiti behind the competition.

  12. #12
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Ha, he said they will actually "be better on defense". Yea right.

    And listen to this..."Bridges and Shepard are so good, it's given them the luxury of putting Hilton at Safety."

    I hope they fall flat on their face this year, so I can tweet Parrish all of his idiotic quotes. Bridges and Shepard have yet to play a SEC snap.
    Golson and prewitt drove that defense last year. Between them, they had 13 ints, 2 td's, 7 TFL, 10 pass break ups, 77 tackles, and 1/2 sack. No big loss, yeah right

  13. #13
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,657
    vCash
    2238605444
    Quote Originally Posted by thf24 View Post
    Nope, all is well. If I were one of them, it would only scare me if Kelly DIDN'T have more swagger.**
    This type?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWkVa-_sd24

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,495
    vCash
    12667
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Ha, he said they will actually "be better on defense". Yea right.
    I expect them to be very, very good on defense. I don't know whether they will be better or not, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were.

  15. #15
    Super Moderator BeastMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,504
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by thf24 View Post
    Shepard may have all the talent in the world, but I'll believe that a hearing-impaired individual can be a 100% effective D1 football DB when I see it.
    He can hear now. There was a recent article somewhere about that.

  16. #16
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    19,825
    vCash
    53100
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    but Kelly has more Swagger".
    Hell, Reeco had swagger***



    I think I'd prefer actual QB "skills" over QB "swagger". Love to have both, but if forced to choose, it would be an easy decision.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,700
    vCash
    17200
    They will be good on D. Their QB play will cost them at least 4 losses
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  18. #18
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,315
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    but Kelly has more Swagger".

    That scares me if I'm Ole Miss.

    Thoughts?
    Sounds like the perfect recipe for Kelly throwing lots of INTs this year.

  19. #19
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    They will be good on D. Their QB play will cost them at least 4 losses
    I agree they will be good on D, but I am slightly amused that they believe there will be no drop off at the two corner spots, due to recruiting stars.

    I mean, would people like us more if Rankin was starting? It would give us more stars in the starting lineup.

    I have never seen a greater assumption made that JUCO players, who traditionally take a year to adjust, are going to step in and not miss a beat from last year.

    Think about it, between Kelly, Bridges, & Tee, they are heavily relying on 3 JUCO transfers, that have never taken a D1 snap, to step in and be world beaters.

    What are the odds that all 3 pan out?

  20. #20
    Senior Member PSYCHO(thesis)DEFENSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Stkvll
    Posts
    596
    vCash
    55991
    Quote Originally Posted by BeastMan View Post
    He can hear now. There was a recent article somewhere about that.
    Faith healing can be a great recruiting tool if exploited properly

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.