-
Parrish Alford says "Buchanan more accurate than Kelly...
but Kelly has more Swagger".
That scares me if I'm Ole Miss.
Thoughts?
-
-
-
Nope, all is well. If I were one of them, it would only scare me if Kelly DIDN'T have more swagger.**
-

Originally Posted by
I seen it dawg
Love me some swag
Most important factor in winning games is swag. I would go with Kelly. Natty is gonna be a cake walk for them
-
He also says Rod Taylor will be back for Bama, which means they will have 2 first year starters on the O-Line, in Taylor and Patterson, when they go to Bama. So they'll have Taylor at RG, Patterson at LG, a new Center (forgot his name), and a new QB....AT TUSCALOOSA. That could end very badly for the Bears.
-
Zero reason they shouldn't win every game with all the pieces they have in place.
-
Ha, he said they will actually "be better on defense". Yea right.
And listen to this..."Bridges and Shepard are so good, it's given them the luxury of putting Hilton at Safety."
I hope they fall flat on their face this year, so I can tweet Parrish all of his idiotic quotes. Bridges and Shepard have yet to play a SEC snap.
-

Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
He also says Rod Taylor will be back for Bama, which means they will have 2 first year starters on the O-Line, in Taylor and Patterson, when they go to Bama. So they'll have Taylor at RG, Patterson at LG, a new Center (forgot his name), and a new QB....AT TUSCALOOSA. That could end very badly for the Bears.
Give me Taylor and Patterson vs a'shawn Robinson and Jonathan Allen any day**
-

Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
Bridges and Shepard have yet to play a SEC snap.
Shepard may have all the talent in the world, but I'll believe that a hearing-impaired individual can be a 100% effective D1 football DB when I see it.
-

Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
but Kelly has more Swagger".
That scares me if I'm Ole Miss.
Thoughts?
Kelly has the one thing that will push him to starter status at TSUN...a criminal record. If Buchanan wants to see meaningful snaps he better get to work on that rap sheet. He's two arrests and a trip to Haiti behind the competition.
-

Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
Ha, he said they will actually "be better on defense". Yea right.
And listen to this..."Bridges and Shepard are so good, it's given them the luxury of putting Hilton at Safety."
I hope they fall flat on their face this year, so I can tweet Parrish all of his idiotic quotes. Bridges and Shepard have yet to play a SEC snap.
Golson and prewitt drove that defense last year. Between them, they had 13 ints, 2 td's, 7 TFL, 10 pass break ups, 77 tackles, and 1/2 sack. No big loss, yeah right
-

Originally Posted by
thf24
Nope, all is well. If I were one of them, it would only scare me if Kelly DIDN'T have more swagger.**
This type?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWkVa-_sd24
-

Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
Ha, he said they will actually "be better on defense". Yea right.
I expect them to be very, very good on defense. I don't know whether they will be better or not, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were.
-

Originally Posted by
thf24
Shepard may have all the talent in the world, but I'll believe that a hearing-impaired individual can be a 100% effective D1 football DB when I see it.
He can hear now. There was a recent article somewhere about that.
-

Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
but Kelly has more Swagger".
Hell, Reeco had swagger***

I think I'd prefer actual QB "skills" over QB "swagger". Love to have both, but if forced to choose, it would be an easy decision.
-
They will be good on D. Their QB play will cost them at least 4 losses
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-

Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
but Kelly has more Swagger".
That scares me if I'm Ole Miss.
Thoughts?
Sounds like the perfect recipe for Kelly throwing lots of INTs this year.
-

Originally Posted by
Coach34
They will be good on D. Their QB play will cost them at least 4 losses
I agree they will be good on D, but I am slightly amused that they believe there will be no drop off at the two corner spots, due to recruiting stars.
I mean, would people like us more if Rankin was starting? It would give us more stars in the starting lineup.
I have never seen a greater assumption made that JUCO players, who traditionally take a year to adjust, are going to step in and not miss a beat from last year.
Think about it, between Kelly, Bridges, & Tee, they are heavily relying on 3 JUCO transfers, that have never taken a D1 snap, to step in and be world beaters.
What are the odds that all 3 pan out?
-

Originally Posted by
BeastMan
He can hear now. There was a recent article somewhere about that.
Faith healing can be a great recruiting tool if exploited properly
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.