Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 68

Thread: Week 1 Depth Chart out

  1. #21
    Senior Member Pokerdawg44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    108
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    I can't understand why we keep putting Robert Johnson back to return kicks. I would like to have two guys capable of breaking one big. I guess we are planning to let Jameon return every kick and let RoJo be the lead blocker? That would make sense.

    Other than that...it's a garbage depth chart yet again. Chris jones 2nd team? Why even post something that ridiculous, Dan?
    My guess is J Lewis is the primary returner and RoJo is mainly a lead blocker. Even tho hes back there he doesn't get the chance to return many kos.

  2. #22
    Senior Member thf24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,543
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by MarketingBully01 View Post
    I don't necessarily think that's a negative regarding Warren. We know Senior had a great camp and the coaches are really high on him. What that tells me is Warren is making a push which can only be a good thing.
    That's how I took it too. Just struck me as impressive how far he's come at a new position in so little time, if taken at face value.

  3. #23
    Senior Member UMCDawg16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Jackson, MS
    Posts
    377
    vCash
    3100
    I think this depth chart shows just how committed this staff is to having upperclassmen high on the depth chart regardless of ability and/or actual reps this season. I think its more of a "earn your stripes" approach when it comes to being high on the DC. I think our depth charts have less to do with actual season reps than most every team in the country. Stricktly for the media.

  4. #24
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,420
    vCash
    7178
    of Holloway is our punt fumbler this season, I'm going to be PO'd.

  5. #25
    Senior Member War Machine Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    N5 London Colney
    Posts
    10,586
    vCash
    3921
    Pissed we aren't giving Holloway and/or Redmond a chance in the return game. Ben Franklin say "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results." Mullen needs to be put in a straight jacket if you look at our ST decisions. Completely, totally unacceptable.
    It's the roller coaster of hope that this program keeps us on that makes it hell being a State fan. - CadaverDawg, 10/15/22


  6. #26
    Senior Member deltadawg99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    791
    vCash
    3200
    I don't understand why we keep putting Robert Johnson back there to return kicks. He's a damn possession WR.

  7. #27
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,749
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Ennis Del Mar View Post
    Ill be nervous if warren plays a lot of snaps this year
    Why? Just curious. He has great feet and has been our blocking TE in goalline packages- they sent him in to do that because he was our best blocking TE. It's not surprising he would be making a push if he accepted the move and put effort into it
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  8. #28
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,749
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Covercorner2 View Post
    Why do we always have our starting WRs, regardless of how explosive they are, returning kicks?
    because those guys get the most work at "catching' the ball.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,501
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Why? Just curious. He has great feet and has been our blocking TE in goalline packages- they sent him in to do that because he was our best blocking TE. It's not surprising he would be making a push if he accepted the move and put effort into it
    You watched him in the spring and said he was horrible.

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,501
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by deltadawg99 View Post
    I don't understand why we keep putting Robert Johnson back there to return kicks. He's a damn possession WR.
    It almost Darius Slay bad, that Will Redomond isn't returning kicks.

  11. #31
    Senior Member deltadawg99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    791
    vCash
    3200
    Slay was only a juco all american for being a return man. Makes way too much sense to put him back there. Nothing against Banks, but Slay was a good bit faster and more explosive in the return game.

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,607
    vCash
    10296
    I don't think this depth chart warrants the level of attention it's getting, just my 2 cents.

  13. #33
    Senior Member Dawghouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    252
    vCash
    3788
    Our back-ups are All-Americans.

  14. #34
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Quote Originally Posted by deltadawg99 View Post
    I don't understand why we keep putting Robert Johnson back there to return kicks. He's a damn possession WR.
    Rojo was the return man last year for every game & returned 4 kicks. He's basically the lead blocker for Tubby. Now if you wanna switch Tubby out & put in someone else cool but Rojo job isn't to run back kicks it's to lead Tubby.

  15. #35
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,749
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    You watched him in the spring and said he was horrible.
    I didnt say Warren was horrible- I said Robinson was...and Thomas...notice neither one will be at OT for us this year
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  16. #36
    Senior Member DudyDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Owner of Burnley Football Club
    Posts
    5,243
    vCash
    3000
    Literally the only position that concerns me is safety (not including future injuries of course). And concern is a verrrrry strong word. It's more curiousity. With Hughes coming back from injury, and Cox making the move (neither were our safety last season). I guess that's the only place we don't know what we are going to get. Cox is an elite athlete but can he be an elite safety? I think so, but I'm not sure. Is Hughes back to 100% and improving as a player? We will see. We do have Market, who's solid, so that's why I hesitate saying I'm concerned. I think they will be the key to us having a top 7 SEC defense or the top of the league.

    Not really worried about RT due to Daks ability to move and our ability to use misdirection/read options in the run game. Also, it's not his blindside. Think that'll cover up some of our "weaknesses" there

  17. #37
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,689
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by DudyDawg View Post
    Literally the only position that concerns me is safety (not including future injuries of course). And concern is a verrrrry strong word. It's more curiousity. With Hughes coming back from injury, and Cox making the move (neither were our safety last season). I guess that's the only place we don't know what we are going to get. Cox is an elite athlete but can he be an elite safety? I think so, but I'm not sure. Is Hughes back to 100% and improving as a player? We will see. We do have Market, who's solid, so that's why I hesitate saying I'm concerned. I think they will be the key to us having a top 7 SEC defense or the top of the league.

    Not really worried about RT due to Daks ability to move and our ability to use misdirection/read options in the run game. Also, it's not his blindside. Think that'll cover up some of our "weaknesses" there
    Cox will be a far better safety than he was a corner. He's back at his natural spot, which I'm sure you're aware of since it's been said so much.

  18. #38
    Senior Member DudyDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Owner of Burnley Football Club
    Posts
    5,243
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Cox will be a far better safety than he was a corner. He's back at his natural spot, which I'm sure you're aware of since it's been said so much.
    Agree that he will be better at safety than at corner. Just hope his brain equals his physical ability there and he can be a ball hawk. If he can, with the ability we will have to stop the run with that mammoth front, we can be one of the top defenses in the country.

  19. #39
    Senior Member Pokerdawg44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    108
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    I didnt say Warren was horrible- I said Robinson was...and Thomas...notice neither one will be at OT for us this year
    So our 2 Four star oline recruits turned out terrible.

  20. #40
    Senior Member Reason2succeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,066
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawghouse View Post
    Our back-ups are All-Americans.
    Exactly! Mullen puts seniors as starters so that the NFL scouts will at least take a look at them. Scouts aren't lazy but they are trying to look at hundreds of players. So, our coaching staff makes sure that the seniors are up front to be seen. Yeah, they want to look at Chris Jones, but for what, he isn't coming out this year anyway. Put someone as the starter who is still better than 60% of the starters at other schools and hope he gets a combine invite of a FA contract.
    Death penalty or bust!!!***

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.