Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: End of first half clock management

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    18,151
    vCash
    12510

    End of first half clock management

    Really pissed me off and this is an area that Lebby has to improve. Does anyone hold him accountable on this? After the big Bothwell run, I believe we could have let the clock run until the 2 minute warning but we went tempo and ran an extra play for 1 yard. Someone can check me on this but thats a huge mistake.

    Kicking a FG and making OM burn timeouts is more valuable than scoring a TD and leaving them 1:50 and 3.

    Especially with us receiving the ball to start the 2nd half. Its called the middle 8 and its extremely important. We could have won the middle 8 14-0 or 10-0 instead it ended up 14-6 OM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35,382
    vCash
    27200
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Really pissed me off and this is an area that Lebby has to improve. Does anyone hold him accountable on this? After the big Bothwell run, I believe we could have let the clock run until the 2 minute warning but we went tempo and ran an extra play for 1 yard. Someone can check me on this but thats a huge mistake.

    Kicking a FG and making OM burn timeouts is more valuable than scoring a TD and leaving them 1:50 and 3.

    Especially with us receiving the ball to start the 2nd half. Its called the middle 8 and its extremely important. We could have won the middle 8 14-0 or 10-0 instead it ended up 14-6 OM.
    Fluff was run OOB at the 2:32 mark which stops the clock until the ball is spotted and they set the chains- but the 40 second clock starts immediately. I cant attest to whether the 40 second clock was below the 32 mark after the play. We ran the ball for basically no gain and then went to the 2 min TO. Then we threw it twice incompete and had to kick the FG. But Mississippi had all 3 TO's left.

    I dont see any mismanagement there- especially if the 40 was below the 32 mark when the ball was set. Had we run and then run again- then kicked the FG- Mississippi still had a TO left. They didnt hurry in their 2 min O- they let the clock run on purpose because they could. I dont think it mattered in the game either way. The problem was we couldnt stop them from throwing the FB
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    18,151
    vCash
    12510
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Fluff was run OOB at the 2:32 mark which stops the clock until the ball is spotted and they set the chains- but the 40 second clock starts immediately. I cant attest to whether the 40 second clock was below the 32 mark after the play. We ran the ball for basically no gain and then went to the 2 min TO. Then we threw it twice incompete and had to kick the FG. But Mississippi had all 3 TO's left.

    I dont see any mismanagement there- especially if the 40 was below the 32 mark when the ball was set. Had we run and then run again- then kicked the FG- Mississippi still had a TO left. They didnt hurry in their 2 min O- they let the clock run on purpose because they could. I dont think it mattered in the game either way. The problem was we couldnt stop them from throwing the FB
    If we ran a play before the 2 minute warning when we didnt have to, thats a big, big mistake.

  4. #4
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,305
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Fluff was run OOB at the 2:32 mark which stops the clock until the ball is spotted and they set the chains- but the 40 second clock starts immediately. I cant attest to whether the 40 second clock was below the 32 mark after the play. We ran the ball for basically no gain and then went to the 2 min TO. Then we threw it twice incompete and had to kick the FG. But Mississippi had all 3 TO's left.

    I dont see any mismanagement there- especially if the 40 was below the 32 mark when the ball was set. Had we run and then run again- then kicked the FG- Mississippi still had a TO left. They didnt hurry in their 2 min O- they let the clock run on purpose because they could. I dont think it mattered in the game either way. The problem was we couldnt stop them from throwing the FB
    Lebby is horrible at clock management, that is obvious. It is as if he never even considers it.

    There was 1 second between the play clock and 2:00 there, so yes, in that scenario we had to snap it. But a) why are we going hurry up there? Bothwell quickly ran back in and threw the ball to the ref near the spot or we could have run it all the way down, and b) if you wait and run the play with 2:02 on the clock, you are still going to run it down under the 2:00 before the clock stops. So you will still use more clock than we did. It is a pattern of just not caring about the clock when the clock absolutely matters in Ws and Ls.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    18,151
    vCash
    12510
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Lebby is horrible at clock management, that is obvious. It is as if he never even considers it.

    There was 1 second between the play clock and 2:00 there, so yes, in that scenario we had to snap it. But a) why are we going hurry up there? Bothwell quickly ran back in and threw the ball to the ref near the spot or we could have run it all the way down, and b) if you wait and run the play with 2:02 on the clock, you are still going to run it down under the 2:00 before the clock stops. So you will still use more clock than we did. It is a pattern of just not caring about the clock when the clock absolutely matters in Ws and Ls.
    Clark Lea was a master of game management today. I?m really impressed with him.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35,382
    vCash
    27200
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Lebby is horrible at clock management, that is obvious. It is as if he never even considers it.

    There was 1 second between the play clock and 2:00 there, so yes, in that scenario we had to snap it. But a) why are we going hurry up there? Bothwell quickly ran back in and threw the ball to the ref near the spot or we could have run it all the way down, and b) if you wait and run the play with 2:02 on the clock, you are still going to run it down under the 2:00 before the clock stops. So you will still use more clock than we did. It is a pattern of just not caring about the clock when the clock absolutely matters in Ws and Ls.
    Because that is our philosophy and that is what he does everyday in practice. So basically yes- we had to run a play and we did and then it hit the 2 min warning. There was no clock mismanagement. Mississippi took their time to go score. It was a walk in the park for them. End of story

    Now- if u want to talk the Texas game when we snapped the football at 20 seconds on the playclock up 17 points? You have a very valid point and Lebbo messed that up. He has to grow as a coach and realize there needs to be a philosophy change when up 17 in the 4th. There is philosophy and then there is smart football at a lower program playing against Giants
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  7. #7
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35,382
    vCash
    27200
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Clark Lea was a master of game management today. I?m really impressed with him.
    How? He went 0-8 in the SEC in Y3. I'm told that a good coach cant do that
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    18,151
    vCash
    12510
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    How? He went 0-8 in the SEC in Y3. I'm told that a good coach cant do that
    I know right.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35,382
    vCash
    27200
    I saw something that talked about Candy stepping up to being top 5 in the SEC in NIL. Said even Carol Swain was donating to NIL. That would explain alot as to why they are 10-2
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    18,151
    vCash
    12510
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    I saw something that talked about Candy stepping up to being top 5 in the SEC in NIL. Said even Carol Swain was donating to NIL. That would explain alot as to why they are 10-2
    Candy has a ton of things going for them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.