Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 51

Thread: Title IX lawsuit vs NIL

  1. #21
    Senior Member Catfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    1,661
    vCash
    7164452
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    Correct. There must be a link between the school and the collective to satisfy the state action requirement. I suspect coaches have directed collectives how to spend money, and that would be an issue.
    Bingo!! They're going to dig deep and find out what role coaches played in this.

  2. #22
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,087
    vCash
    52714
    Decent chance this is one of the big hitters in football breaking off from normal athletics. But, Title 9 is about opportunity and females have the same opportunity to make money. See LSU as two of their top NILs were a gymnast and women's BBall player.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,670
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    Decent chance this is one of the big hitters in football breaking off from normal athletics. But, Title 9 is about opportunity and females have the same opportunity to make money. See LSU as two of their top NILs were a gymnast and women's BBall player.
    Good point on the money at lsu

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Flowood
    Posts
    3,573
    vCash
    3100
    University of Oregon is the first to be sued for NIL, but I can bet my trailer that Mississippi State would be the first university to lose a NIL lawsuit.

  5. #25
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    See LSU as two of their top NILs were a gymnast and women's BBall player.
    But those are actual NIL deals. I think there is a decent chance they win the lawsuit and ultimately schools either pay everyone a flat amount or are forced to become less involved.

    There is a huge difference in an athlete working out their own NIL deal with another company or agency, and a program paying an athlete for being an athlete. They have a pretty good case here.

  6. #26
    Senior Member Catfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    1,661
    vCash
    7164452
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    But those are actual NIL deals. I think there is a decent chance they win the lawsuit and ultimately schools either pay everyone a flat amount or are forced to become less involved.

    There is a huge difference in an athlete working out their own NIL deal with another company or agency, and a program paying an athlete for being an athlete. They have a pretty good case here.
    PARITY in college football?

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    5,693
    vCash
    3621
    Quote Originally Posted by Activated Alpha View Post
    University of Oregon is the first to be sued for NIL, but I can bet my trailer that Mississippi State would be the first university to lose a NIL lawsuit.
    Raiding MSU's NIL may not be worth any lawyer's time. The legal horde is going to first amass on the outskirts of Austin and College Station.

    That said, I thought our biggest NIL hauler was a young lady, the blonde softball player.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,670
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    But those are actual NIL deals. I think there is a decent chance they win the lawsuit and ultimately schools either pay everyone a flat amount or are forced to become less involved.

    There is a huge difference in an athlete working out their own NIL deal with another company or agency, and a program paying an athlete for being an athlete. They have a pretty good case here.
    They are all actual NIL deals.

    How will they show that a program is paying an athlete for being an athlete if the entity doing the paying (the collective) is private and not the program?

  9. #29
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,047
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    They are all actual NIL deals.

    How will they show that a program is paying an athlete for being an athlete if the entity doing the paying (the collective) is private and not the program?
    You have programs where every single football player has an NIL deal. I think that is where the arguments are going to go. Hard to argue that a 4th stringer is getting paid through a school NIL for anything more than just being on the team.

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,728
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    But those are actual NIL deals. I think there is a decent chance they win the lawsuit and ultimately schools either pay everyone a flat amount or are forced to become less involved.

    There is a huge difference in an athlete working out their own NIL deal with another company or agency, and a program paying an athlete for being an athlete. They have a pretty good case here.
    I don't disagree w you but the BI, for example isnt w the school. So being a separate entity, not sure how they can tell them how to spend the money. But .... never know.

  11. #31
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,087
    vCash
    52714
    This is a likekeness and image usage deal that's somewhat seperate from the school. Who believes a female soccer player is having their image/likeness utilized like top football players?
    Again, it's opportunity. NIL isn't school sponsored and schools can't control NIL or contribute to it.

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    765
    vCash
    5218
    It may be legally separate frm the school, but it will be very easy to uncover evidence that NIL folks have talked to coaches or others associated with the school. In many cases the NIL sponsors just sent their $'s to the athletes directly and reduced their donation to the booster clubs. The death blow to the present NIL system will be when the lawyers are able to piece the various elements together, which shouldn't be too hard. When that happens the NCAA and title 9 will fall apart.

  13. #33
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,087
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by redstickdawg View Post
    It may be legally separate frm the school, but it will be very easy to uncover evidence that NIL folks have talked to coaches or others associated with the school. In many cases the NIL sponsors just sent their $'s to the athletes directly and reduced their donation to the booster clubs. The death blow to the present NIL system will be when the lawyers are able to piece the various elements together, which shouldn't be too hard. When that happens the NCAA and title 9 will fall apart.
    And they'll find the coaches didn't get what they wanted a lot of times. And I do mean a lot.

  14. #34
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    19,830
    vCash
    53100
    Nm.
    Last edited by BeardoMSU; 12-01-2023 at 08:19 PM.

  15. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    9,664
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by preachermatt83 View Post
    They don?t have a case. It?s not through the school. NIL is private
    Doesn't matter in today's world. I think the case will lose but who knows.

  16. #36
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    This is a likekeness and image usage deal that's somewhat seperate from the school. Who believes a female soccer player is having their image/likeness utilized like top football players?
    Again, it's opportunity. NIL isn't school sponsored and schools can't control NIL or contribute to it.
    Schools absolutely do control how the NIL money is spent. The way these collectives are run has essentially nothing to do with actual NIL.

  17. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    7,382
    vCash
    3100
    Title IX is no longer protecting women's sports on many levels today.

  18. #38
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,317
    vCash
    3700
    Player greed has college athletics on a very dangerous path. You have pre-NIL players suing for money and now femaie athletes suing for money. Just shows what a joke NIL is in that it was supposed to be folks making money off their name, likeness and image. If that was true there would be no basis for suing because each individual would just be making money off their own personal notoriety. However, the majority of NIL is just straight pay for play which opens things up for the lawsuits.

  19. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Covington, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,573
    vCash
    700722589
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldendawg View Post
    Title IX is no longer protecting women's sports on many levels today.
    THEY NEED TO PROTECT THE BIOGIOCAL LADIES FIRST AGAINST TRANSGENDER WANTABEES, and yea I am yelling.

  20. #40
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    3,095
    vCash
    3000
    word. why do we have no girls changing into a man to play the boy sports for?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.