Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 221

Thread: McMahon, Jans, or Golden

  1. #61
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    351
    vCash
    3100
    It's a total coin flip between any of these mid major coaches whether they pan out or not. Personally would rather have McMahan because of the Ja morant connection but again it's all a coin flip.

  2. #62
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,087
    vCash
    52714
    Bring on Coach Jans!

  3. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,947
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by calidawg View Post
    It's a total coin flip between any of these mid major coaches whether they pan out or not. Personally would rather have McMahan because of the Ja morant connection but again it's all a coin flip.
    Agreed. I'd prefer Jans just because he's won at more stops, but I haven't done any research into how any of these coaches win. Ideally you'd see a coach win with scouting and player development, not, say, executing a complex offense really well. An MSU coach (and most SEC coaches not named Kentucky) are going to have to make tradeoffs between athleticism, skill, and basketball smarts. You may not be able to keep a seven team rotation that can execute a complex offense at a very high level without having to make too much of a tradeoff on the athleticism side.

  4. #64
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,745
    vCash
    3002900
    No guarantees whoever we hire will win big, but I like Jans the most out of the names being mentioned. I feel like he would be about as much of a "homerun" as we could hope for

  5. #65
    Senior Member Turfdawg67's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    5,243
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    If we cut ties with Howland without a replacement having a deal in principel, this close in time to the Rick Ray fiasco and also after Cohen personally got suckered on the baseball hire by agents "showing interest", then it is a fireable offense for cohen. I really don't think that's going to happen or else we'd already have an announcement on Howland.
    I don't know about a fireable offense. Let's ask Leeshouldveflanked for his opinion. ***

  6. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    355
    vCash
    3100
    Looking at Chris Jans analytics. His teams play slow (adjusted tempo is similar to Howland) and they excel at Offensive Rebounding (also similar to Howland.) The one key difference between Jans and Howland is that the 3pt rate (% of FG attempts that are 3s) is much higher for Jans than Howland. This year New Mexico State is around 100th in 3pt rate but in the three years prior they were top 25 in the nation in 3pt rate. It tells me that Jans at least has a clue about analytics and how long 2pt shots are garbage. Mississippi State has been 330th+ in the nation the last two years in 3pt rate. I think Howland did a better job than most but when you shoot that few # of 3 pointers you are just making your life so much more difficult in modern basketball.
    Last edited by CovertDawg; 03-17-2022 at 02:26 PM.

  7. #67
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,978
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by CovertDawg View Post
    Looking at Chris Jans analytics. His teams play slow (adjusted tempo is similar to Howland) and they excel at Offensive Rebounding (also similar to Howland.) The one key difference between Jans and Howland is that the 3pt rate (% of FG attempts that are 3s) is much higher for Jans than Howland. This year New Mexico State is around 100th in 3pt rate but in the three years prior they were top 25 in the nation in 3pt rate. It tells me that Jans at least has a clue about analytics and how long 2pt shots are garbage. Mississippi State has been 330th+ in the nation the last two years in 3pt rate. I think Howland did a better job than most but when you shoot that few # of 3 pointers you are just making your life so much more difficult in modern basketball.
    We dont shoot many 3's because we cant make them. We were 336th in the country in percentage.

    Fault Howland for not recruiting shooters- but his offense was tailored to the strength of the team.

    My problem with Howland is that we NEVER changed defenses. EVER. 167th in the country in FG D. No imagination at all. Nothing to help confuse teams or anything. Ridiculous
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  8. #68
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,913
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by CovertDawg View Post
    Looking at Chris Jans analytics. His teams play slow (adjusted tempo is similar to Howland) and they excel at Offensive Rebounding (also similar to Howland.) The one key difference between Jans and Howland is that the 3pt rate (% of FG attempts that are 3s) is much higher for Jans than Howland. This year New Mexico State is around 100th in 3pt rate but in the three years prior they were top 25 in the nation in 3pt rate. It tells me that Jans at least has a clue about analytics and how long 2pt shots are garbage. Mississippi State has been 330th+ in the nation the last two years in 3pt rate. I think Howland did a better job than most but when you shoot that few # of 3 pointers you are just making your life so much more difficult in modern basketball.
    Great. More slow boring basketball.

  9. #69
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    355
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    We dont shoot many 3's because we cant make them. We were 336th in the country in percentage.

    Fault Howland for not recruiting shooters- but his offense was tailored to the strength of the team.

    My problem with Howland is that we NEVER changed defenses. EVER. 167th in the country in FG D. No imagination at all. Nothing to help confuse teams or anything. Ridiculous
    I agree Howland played the way he had to this year and yes I fault him for not recruiting shooters.

  10. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    4,938
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    We dont shoot many 3's because we cant make them. We were 336th in the country in percentage.

    Fault Howland for not recruiting shooters- but his offense was tailored to the strength of the team.

    My problem with Howland is that we NEVER changed defenses. EVER. 167th in the country in FG D. No imagination at all. Nothing to help confuse teams or anything. Ridiculous
    Well to be fair, his defensive strategy was the same as a Coach of a 5 year old soccer team. Everybody chase the ball! Don?t worry about that guy standing in the corner wide open. His defense wasn?t man to man. It was 10 eyes on the man with the ball!

  11. #71
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,947
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    Great. More slow boring basketball.
    Huge difference between being "slow" because you run an offense and make defenses work versus being "slow" because you walk the ball up the court and routinely run another few seconds off the clock dribbling just past half court waiting on your offense to start.

    No clue which describes Jans's teams, but it is not boring to me to see offenses work and reverse the ball several times, if you hustle up the floor, take advantage of secondary fast breaks when they are there, and can efficiently transition from a secondary break into your offense.

  12. #72
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    Great. More slow boring basketball.
    Tell me you don’t know basketball without saying you don’t know basketball

  13. #73
    Senior Member Catfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    1,671
    vCash
    10426356
    NM State plays in a little while. Might learn something about Jans.

  14. #74
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,162
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by CovertDawg View Post
    I agree Howland played the way he had to this year and yes I fault him for not recruiting shooters.
    We shot 3's at .343 last season, which was among sec leaders. I'm sure howland expected Molinar to at least stay at his 43% from last year; certainly didn't expect him to drop to 26%.

    Howland said watts was a really good shooter in practice. Im sure he planned on having him this season. Not sure I agree about watts being a good shooter though.

    Jeffries shot 39% his freshman year, and 35% his soph years. He then shot 29% this season.

    This season really was cursed. Perhaps the stars aligned to give us jans as he looks like a good coach.

  15. #75
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,261
    vCash
    3000
    Don't know anything about Jans and I hope he's a home run if he is the hire. I will say that New Mexico State has been a good program for a while. Reggie Theus did well in a short tenure, then Marvin Menzies took over and really built them into a consistent winner. Menzies was meh at UNLV and was fired after 3 years. Paul Weir took over for 1 year, did well, then has been bad at New Mexico and was fired after 4 years. Jans has had success more or less in line with them, up maybe a notch, so we'll see. The one thing I know about basketball hires, you literally have absolutely no clue what you're getting until they show up. Some seeming home runs are complete duds and some retread 'Huh?' hires end up being really good.

  16. #76
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Madison, Alabama
    Posts
    15,751
    vCash
    1886332
    Quote Originally Posted by Catfish View Post
    NM State plays in a little while. Might learn something about Jans.
    Yeah, they're playing UConn so almost certainly will lose. 12 seed vs 5. We'll see.

  17. #77
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    355
    vCash
    3100
    https://barttorvik.com/coach-history...h=Chris%20Jans

    Here are some of the metrics for Jans. I would say he is pretty balanced on both sides of the ball. Had 3 years (18-20) in a row where his teams were absolute monsters at rebounding the ball on Offense and Defense. Shoots a lot of 3s but 34.6% is the best one of his teams has averaged from there. Not sure why his team is turning the ball over so much this year.

    And to be fair, Howland's numbers look pretty solid too. The one thing that did Howland in is that his teams at MSU ALWAYS turned the ball over a lot. (251, 317,291, 228, 226, 216, 174) were our national ranks in Offensive Turnover % for each of Howland's years.

  18. #78
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,162
    vCash
    10439
    Jans is from New Mexico? We sure he's gonna leave? If he does, hope he brings teddy Allen with him

  19. #79
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Jans is from New Mexico? We sure he's gonna leave? If he does, hope he brings teddy Allen with him
    He’s not from New Mexico

  20. #80
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,162
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    He’s not from New Mexico
    I didn't think so, but thought I heard announcer say that. I could've misheard

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.