Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Kellum Clark Cape position?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,587
    vCash
    3700

    Kellum Clark Cape position?

    Anyone know? That might give us an indication as to what our coaches are thinking is his future position.

    As an aside, I saw that Logan Tanner hit a HR for team USA in the last couple of days.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,594
    vCash
    3700
    I think he may have been playing first base?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,733
    vCash
    3700
    He's playing first.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Lord McBuckethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,624
    vCash
    3086
    We need him playing first.

  5. #5
    Our Pretentious Preacher preachermatt83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    15,517
    vCash
    165086
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead View Post
    We need him playing first.
    I thought luke did a good job at first
    Romans 5:8

  6. #6
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    19,883
    vCash
    53100
    Quote Originally Posted by preachermatt83 View Post
    I thought luke did a good job at first
    Several guys said Luke won't be back, fwiw.

  7. #7
    Senior Member shoeless joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    3,692
    vCash
    3129
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardoMSU View Post
    Several guys said Luke won't be back, fwiw.
    The only thing I think that would make him want to move on is the fact that Tanner is blocking him at his natural position. Luke is a pro catcher…just happens to be on a team that has another one that’s a little better. I’d like to see him come back and improve upon his power numbers against quality pitching. But am interested to see how it shakes out with him. He was a huge key to this past season.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,733
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by preachermatt83 View Post
    I thought luke did a good job at first
    If Luke gets drafted he's gone. Who knows. But Clark is draft eligible next year. He's gonna bust it to play a spot. Dh isn't much help for him.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,594
    vCash
    3700
    Regardless of what happens with Hancock I don't think he will be our first baseman next year.

    If I had to guess it will be Clark or Hines.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Dawgtini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,280
    vCash
    4075
    Quote Originally Posted by shoeless joe View Post
    The only thing I think that would make him want to move on is the fact that Tanner is blocking him at his natural position. Luke is a pro catcher…just happens to be on a team that has another one that’s a little better. I’d like to see him come back and improve upon his power numbers against quality pitching. But am interested to see how it shakes out with him. He was a huge key to this past season.
    The fact that Luke was the hardest out in all of college baseball says he should be drafted or else come back.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,800
    vCash
    17200
    Is Hancock playing anywhere this summer? I havent seen him listed anywhere
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  12. #12
    Senior Member Lord McBuckethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,624
    vCash
    3086
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgtini View Post
    The fact that Luke was the hardest out in all of college baseball says he should be drafted or else come back.
    Luke simply had quality at bats for what seemed to be the entire season. Sure, he was sacrificing a little of his power to make sure he hit for average, if he came back one more year, I bet he puts up some really good numbers next year.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Saltydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,745
    vCash
    3706
    Quote Originally Posted by shoeless joe View Post
    The only thing I think that would make him want to move on is the fact that Tanner is blocking him at his natural position. Luke is a pro catcher?just happens to be on a team that has another one that?s a little better. I?d like to see him come back and improve upon his power numbers against quality pitching. But am interested to see how it shakes out with him. He was a huge key to this past season.
    That's the problem with Luke. He's NOT a pro catcher. Just isn't good enough defensively. He's not big enough to play 1st so where does he play at the next level? That's what is going to hurt him but at the same token you have a guy that walks a lot and doesn't strike out a bunch so someone will take a chance on him. I don't think he's back. If he's drafted, he's gone.
    "The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)

  14. #14
    Senior Member shoeless joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    3,692
    vCash
    3129
    Quote Originally Posted by Saltydog View Post
    That's the problem with Luke. He's NOT a pro catcher. Just isn't good enough defensively. He's not big enough to play 1st so where does he play at the next level? That's what is going to hurt him but at the same token you have a guy that walks a lot and doesn't strike out a bunch so someone will take a chance on him. I don't think he's back. If he's drafted, he's gone.
    Size is definitely what could hold him back from playing behind the plate. I said that the day he showed up. But you are wrong that he doesn’t have the defensive tools to catch in pro ball. He just happens to play behind Tanner who could be a top round pick in the draft next yr.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,733
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by shoeless joe View Post
    Size is definitely what could hold him back from playing behind the plate. I said that the day he showed up. But you are wrong that he doesn’t have the defensive tools to catch in pro ball. He just happens to play behind Tanner who could be a top round pick in the draft next yr.
    He's not a pro catcher. Salty is right. He's an adequate college catcher. But we wouldn't want him starting there 3 days in the weekend.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    NE MS
    Posts
    1,072
    vCash
    428400
    Quote Originally Posted by shoeless joe View Post
    Size is definitely what could hold him back from playing behind the plate. I said that the day he showed up. But you are wrong that he doesn’t have the defensive tools to catch in pro ball. He just happens to play behind Tanner who could be a top round pick in the draft next yr.
    I don't get the size problem for Luke. He is 5' 11" and 190lbs. He is only about an inch shorter and 15-20lbs lighter than the average catcher in the MLB. He is taller than several of them by an inch or two and he is sure to add a few pounds of muscle over the next couple years if he keeps working at it. That would put him just below the average size for a MLB catcher. It's not like he is 5' 5" or something. Where does this come from the he is too small?

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    NE MS
    Posts
    1,072
    vCash
    428400
    Luke would be about the same size as Yadier Molina who is only 5' 11" and weighs in at 205lbs and bigger than Christian Vazquez who is 5' 9" and 194lbs. Both are considered two of the better catchers in the game.

    If the skills and power are there then his size won't be his limiting factor.

  18. #18
    Senior Member WSOPdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    3,060
    vCash
    10633933960
    Quote Originally Posted by shoeless joe View Post
    Size is definitely what could hold him back from playing behind the plate. I said that the day he showed up. But you are wrong that he doesn’t have the defensive tools to catch in pro ball. He just happens to play behind Tanner who could be a top round pick in the draft next yr.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hot Rock View Post
    I don't get the size problem for Luke. He is 5' 11" and 190lbs. He is only about an inch shorter and 15-20lbs lighter than the average catcher in the MLB. He is taller than several of them by an inch or two and he is sure to add a few pounds of muscle over the next couple years if he keeps working at it. That would put him just below the average size for a MLB catcher. It's not like he is 5' 5" or something. Where does this come from the he is too small?
    But CJ Rodriguez, 5-10, 200 lb backstop from Vanderbilt was selected in the 5th round... so the argument about size is BS... just saying.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.