Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 53 of 53

Thread: Another Bama WR in the Portal

  1. #41
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,622
    vCash
    3086
    Quote Originally Posted by Jarius View Post
    Man that's so ridiculous. They have more 4 and 5 star players than they have room for on the 85 man roster.
    We need two difference makers. One at DB and one at WR. We have used 83 spots currently, correct. I don't see the problem. We have undersigned every year for a decade. It would be nice to start the season with 85 for once.

  2. #42
    Senior Member msu15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,034
    vCash
    1053100
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead View Post
    We need two difference makers. One at DB and one at WR. We have used 83 spots currently, correct. I don't see the problem. We have undersigned every year for a decade. It would be nice to start the season with 85 for once.
    We only have 83 spots for the next two seasons due to tutorgate
    "We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.

  3. #43
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,520
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead View Post
    We need two difference makers. One at DB and one at WR. We have used 83 spots currently, correct. I don't see the problem. We have undersigned every year for a decade. It would be nice to start the season with 85 for once.
    That always drove me nuts every time Dan and Joe undersigned. Our spots are valuable and that's just leaving spots on the table.

  4. #44
    Bennie Brown Know-It-All
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    4,084
    vCash
    3138
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead View Post
    We need two difference makers. One at DB and one at WR. We have used 83 spots currently, correct. I don't see the problem. We have undersigned every year for a decade. It would be nice to start the season with 85 for once.
    Yea like MSU15 said, we can't have 85 this year. We will have to process some people if we want to add anyone else.

  5. #45
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,245
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by Jarius View Post
    Yea like MSU15 said, we can't have 85 this year. We will have to process some people if we want to add anyone else.
    I member when "process" was "evil"....

    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  6. #46
    Senior Member msu15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,034
    vCash
    1053100
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    I member when "process" was "evil"....

    Guilty
    "We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.

  7. #47
    Bennie Brown Know-It-All
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    4,084
    vCash
    3138
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    I member when "process" was "evil"....

    A lot of transfer rules have changed since that time. If kids can do what they want then so should the schools.

  8. #48
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,245
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by msu15 View Post
    Guilty
    Rep added for honesty & your "Location"...
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  9. #49
    Senior Member BB30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Columbus, Ms
    Posts
    2,147
    vCash
    3523
    IMO do what you can to get him on the roster. We need as many quality athletes as we can get. We'll probably end up losing a couple more next year in the portal anyway. Figure out who your weak links are and get them out of there.

    If kids can just up and leave whenever they want we shouldn't feel bad about cutting a kid assuming there is a legitimate reason.

    It looks as though the portal will be a good friend to us. We may lose a few here and there but the upside to gaining better athletes plays in our favor. I think we simply have more to gain with the portal.

  10. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,622
    vCash
    3086
    Quote Originally Posted by msu15 View Post
    We only have 83 spots for the next two seasons due to tutorgate
    Thanks. Forgot about that.

  11. #51
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,622
    vCash
    3086
    Well if someone needs to go.....i vote for one of the guys involved in Tutorgate that will never see the field anyway. This is the SEC. This is not the glee club.

  12. #52
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,622
    vCash
    3086
    In reality, I love all the guys that decided on MSU for their future.

  13. #53
    Senior Member msu15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,034
    vCash
    1053100
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    Rep added for honesty & your "Location"...
    Hahahaha, I was wondering when you'd catch it lolol
    "We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.