-

Originally Posted by
msbulldog
So start Hill in the slot and AW in the backfield, problem solved.
Works for me... Or at least a package both in backfield and Hill motions to the slot. That formation alone could lead to screens, jet sweeps and more. That gives Hill touches in space. Gives us a reliable pass blocker in the backfield. JoMo hint hint
-
It's interesting to me that some people railed on Mullen for playing seniority/experience over talent and citing pass blocking as a reason the more talented running back wasn't getting snaps, yet now we have a thread full of people wanting the less talented senior running back that is only better at pass blocking to be playing over the more talented guy. I'm sure it is a different group of people, so I'm not suggesting that minds have changed, just pointing out the difference in viewpoint.
Kylin is quicker, faster, stronger, a more talented runner, a more explosive receiver and apparently more accountable off the field. Aeris is tough as nails, a great pass blocker who is more experienced, but otherwise brings nothing as a runner that Kylin doesn't. Aeris will make a 0 yard gain 4 yards every time, but sometimes he'll also make a 12 yard gain only 4 yards.
I think the upside Kylin gives as a ball carrier and playmaker is worth the downgrade in pass blocking. Clearly many in this thread do not, and I respect that opinion though I disagree.
Just an interesting fan dynamic...
-
I like the idea of playing both at the same time, sometimes in the backfield together, some in the slot, motion in and out of the backfield regardless if it’s a run or pass. Scouts are going to tell our staff that Hill is going to have to improve in pass pro if he wants to play in the NFL. The staff will relay that message to him this year, if it hasn’t been mentioned already.
My opinion is it’s a fvcking waste of talent to not have a running game and a short passing game with those 2 in the game simultaneously. It completely amazes me that coaches get paid so much to deliver so little when the talent is right there in front of them. Just no imagination or creativity especially in short yardage or goal line situations. I digress.
-

Originally Posted by
RiverCityDawg
It's interesting to me that some people railed on Mullen for playing seniority/experience over talent and citing pass blocking as a reason the more talented running back wasn't getting snaps, yet now we have a thread full of people wanting the less talented senior running back that is only better at pass blocking to be playing over the more talented guy. I'm sure it is a different group of people, so I'm not suggesting that minds have changed, just pointing out the difference in viewpoint.
Kylin is quicker, faster, stronger, a more talented runner, a more explosive receiver and apparently more accountable off the field. Aeris is tough as nails, a great pass blocker who is more experienced, but otherwise brings nothing as a runner that Kylin doesn't. Aeris will make a 0 yard gain 4 yards every time, but sometimes he'll also make a 12 yard gain only 4 yards.
I think the upside Kylin gives as a ball carrier and playmaker is worth the downgrade in pass blocking. Clearly many in this thread do not, and I respect that opinion though I disagree.
Just an interesting fan dynamic...
Kylins numbers aren't any better than Aries's though. That's the point people are making.
-

Originally Posted by
RiverCityDawg
It's interesting to me that some people railed on Mullen for playing seniority/experience over talent and citing pass blocking as a reason the more talented running back wasn't getting snaps, yet now we have a thread full of people wanting the less talented senior running back that is only better at pass blocking to be playing over the more talented guy. I'm sure it is a different group of people, so I'm not suggesting that minds have changed, just pointing out the difference in viewpoint.
Kylin is quicker, faster, stronger, a more talented runner, a more explosive receiver and apparently more accountable off the field. Aeris is tough as nails, a great pass blocker who is more experienced, but otherwise brings nothing as a runner that Kylin doesn't. Aeris will make a 0 yard gain 4 yards every time, but sometimes he'll also make a 12 yard gain only 4 yards.
I think the upside Kylin gives as a ball carrier and playmaker is worth the downgrade in pass blocking. Clearly many in this thread do not, and I respect that opinion though I disagree.
Just an interesting fan dynamic...
he will make a 12 yarder into a 4 yarder--what are you basing that on. some stat you have found--eye test--what? I have not seen it.
-

Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
Kylins numbers aren't any better than Aries's though. That's the point people are making.
Number don't always tell the truth. For example, Aeris had 2 carries last week. One was the 29 yard TD late in the 3Q straight up the middle through a wide open hole. Good run, but I think everyone would agree that Kylin or Gibson could have made that play. His only other carry was a 13 yard draw on 3rd and 39. A 13 yard carry is great, but they were playing everyone back and conceded the yardage to get the stop. So he ends the game with a 21 yard average. Is he better than Kylin because Kylin only had 4ypc? Of course not. Now it doesn't mean he's NOT better either. Honestly we don't get either enough carriers for the stats to be reliable on this. Since numbers aren't telling the story, you basically have to make an eye test evaluation.
So, how many non-pass blocking plays this year have you seen Aeris make that you thought Kylin would/could not have made? I haven't seen any. Think of how many plays Kylin has made that Aeris likely couldn't have made? The first play of the season, the TD catch last week. A couple of the runs against KSU. Many of the outside runs and sweeps against Auburn.
Again, pass blocking aside, I don't see how anyone can watch the 2 without bias and say that Kylin is not clearly the more talented runner/receiver. If that's true, you have to admit you would be losing some of Aeris is playing more over him. At that point becomes a subjective debate on the value of Aeris's pass blocking vs Kylin's superior skill as a runner/receiver.
-
Nothing against Kylin but he's not breaking long runs and putting up big numbers. He's getting double the carries but he's not putting up better numbers with them. The difference between the two in skill level isn't being taken advantage of. If that's going to be the case, give Aries touches. If we were actually running Jo's offense, Kylin would be great I think. But we're not running his offense.
-
What has shown us Kylin is better or more explosive than Aeris. Sure, he looks shiftier. I said this before the season, Aeris rarely if ever get tackled for a loss. Aeris picks up blocks. Aeris also probably has just as man 10+ yard runs as Kylin and Kylin is getting 2x the amount of carries. If we are going to go with Kylin, that dude needs to be all over the field. Motioned all over the place to form mismatches. I really want him to get the Saquon treatment in our offense. Hell, let him throw it too.
-

Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
What has shown us Kylin is better or more explosive than Aeris. Sure, he looks shiftier. I said this before the season, Aeris rarely if ever get tackled for a loss. Aeris picks up blocks. Aeris also probably has just as man 10+ yard runs as Kylin and Kylin is getting 2x the amount of carries. If we are going to go with Kylin, that dude needs to be all over the field. Motioned all over the place to form mismatches. I really want him to get the Saquon treatment in our offense. Hell, let him throw it too.
Kylin 10+ yard rushes 15, 20+ yard rushes 3 on 81 carries. Ares 11 and 2 on 48 carries. Aeris has higher percentage of explosive runs
-

Originally Posted by
BhamDawg205
Hill has great hands that's been seen. Those stats are good. But giving those yards back by missing pass rusher every game is the issue. Hill is explosive, Aries is consistent.
They both bring different things to the table and both should be used. I'm just pointing out that at this point they are both similar in production and that's not that clear that one is better than the other.

Originally Posted by
msbulldog
So start Hill in the slot and AW in the backfield, problem solved.
And that this is how you solve the situation. I would imagine that both Hill and Aeris are among our top five most productive skill players. Get them on the field.

Originally Posted by
Thick
I like the idea of playing both at the same time, sometimes in the backfield together, some in the slot, motion in and out of the backfield regardless if it?s a run or pass. Scouts are going to tell our staff that Hill is going to have to improve in pass pro if he wants to play in the NFL. The staff will relay that message to him this year, if it hasn?t been mentioned already.
My opinion is it?s a fvcking waste of talent to not have a running game and a short passing game with those 2 in the game simultaneously. It completely amazes me that coaches get paid so much to deliver so little when the talent is right there in front of them. Just no imagination or creativity especially in short yardage or goal line situations. I digress.
I think with the spread systems that are so prevalent nowadays a lot of coaches have forgotten that you can get a lot of production with two good running backs. I remember Auburn using Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams both in the same formation at times when they were running the WCO. Aeris blocks well enough to function as a de facto FB but he can run and catch like a tailback. That's a luxury. And on top of it Hill catches well enough he could function as a slot receiver and has the vision and physicality to be a great SEC RB. I think a lot of coaches get stuck into the two backs = one must be a traditional blocking back. And it doesn't have to be that way. See the 49ers with Tom Rathman.
-

Originally Posted by
RiverCityDawg
Again, pass blocking aside, I don't see how anyone can watch the 2 without bias and say that Kylin is not clearly the more talented runner/receiver. If that's true, you have to admit you would be losing some of Aeris is playing more over him. At that point becomes a subjective debate on the value of Aeris's pass blocking vs Kylin's superior skill as a runner/receiver.
I pretty much agree. Kylin is clearly more talented, but not by some huge gap. It needs to be handled situationally. If both are healthy, both should play. For Alabama I'd probably start Aeris, just for his blocking.
Nothing wrong with playing 2 RBs, even if they are similar. Look at Georgia. Give both some touches and see who has the hot hand.
-

Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
Kylin 10+ yard rushes 15, 20+ yard rushes 3 on 81 carries. Ares 11 and 2 on 48 carries. Aeris has higher percentage of explosive runs
Could be at least partially explained by Aeris playing more later in games when defenses are wearing down this year.
-

Originally Posted by
thf24
Could be at least partially explained by Aeris playing more later in games when defenses are wearing down this year.
Aeris also started in conference games as well. You have weak opponents where they both had big runs...once you get around 50 or so rushes in 9 games it starts evening out. And I suspect if we really chart it out then they both are behind Nick in percentage
-

Originally Posted by
thf24
Could be at least partially explained by Aeris playing more later in games when defenses are wearing down this year.
come on , he had 1000 yards last year--I guess they came when the defense was tired. They both are quality backs. I'm glad when either one runs the ball. I would like to see Hill in the slot with the Train at RB.
-

Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
Aeris also started in conference games as well. You have weak opponents where they both had big runs...once you get around 50 or so rushes in 9 games it starts evening out. And I suspect if we really chart it out then they both are behind Nick in percentage
Yeppers....
SECRank, Name, Carries, Yards, YPC, TDs (Vs Conference)
13 Kylin Hill 44-223-5.07-0
20 Aeris Williams 31-148-4.77-0
23 Nick Fitzgerald 103-466-4.52-5
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-

Originally Posted by
tcdog70
come on , he had 1000 yards last year--I guess they came when the defense was tired. They both are quality backs. I'm glad when either one runs the ball. I would like to see Hill in the slot with the Train at RB.
They're both great, no doubt. Just speculating as to why Kylin's average is lower despite obviously having more big play ability.
-

Originally Posted by
thf24
They're both great, no doubt. Just speculating as to why Kylin's average is lower despite obviously having more big play ability.
Fair question. I think one reason is there has been so much pressure by everyone to force feed the running backs regardless of the look we're getting from the defense. As the starting running back and guy getting most of the looks, naturally Kylin is going to get more of those force fed or scripted carries. When Aeris gets carries, which isn't often, I think they are typically true run looks.
Actually I think both running backs have high YPCs over 6 because they generally only get the ball when it's a beneficial run look, which isn't often. Naturally, an "always run never pass" approach is going to lead to lower YPC because you don't care what the defense does, your running it anyway. The problem, as we all know, is we haven't been able to consistently take advantage of the pass looks we get most often.
-

Originally Posted by
RiverCityDawg
It's interesting to me that some people railed on Mullen for playing seniority/experience over talent and citing pass blocking as a reason the more talented running back wasn't getting snaps, yet now we have a thread full of people wanting the less talented senior running back that is only better at pass blocking to be playing over the more talented guy. I'm sure it is a different group of people, so I'm not suggesting that minds have changed, just pointing out the difference in viewpoint.
Kylin is quicker, faster, stronger, a more talented runner, a more explosive receiver and apparently more accountable off the field. Aeris is tough as nails, a great pass blocker who is more experienced, but otherwise brings nothing as a runner that Kylin doesn't. Aeris will make a 0 yard gain 4 yards every time, but sometimes he'll also make a 12 yard gain only 4 yards.
I think the upside Kylin gives as a ball carrier and playmaker is worth the downgrade in pass blocking. Clearly many in this thread do not, and I respect that opinion though I disagree.
Just an interesting fan dynamic...
Aries is the complete back and Kylin is a liability on pass blocking.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.