Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: 3D Chess - the Lesson of Paul Skenes

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,878
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    The point of the OP is that we tried to NIL shit the MSU way and it's going to end up costing us more. And he's correct.
    Todd said yesterday we'd have at least 8 more wins with Skenes, maybe more. That too is correct.
    So, let's sit on a questionable coach and not go big on NIL. Because that's the MSU way of doing shit. Then give up that $5MM to the school from our AD too.
    Such a waste
    If you could keep lemonis and use the buyout money to go get a bunch of pitchers, sign me up for that.

    But you have to sell that to your boosters with the buyout money.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,845
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    The point of the OP is that we tried to NIL shit the MSU way and it's going to end up costing us more. And he's correct.
    Todd said yesterday we'd have at least 8 more wins with Skenes, maybe more. That too is correct.
    So, let's sit on a questionable coach and not go big on NIL. Because that's the MSU way of doing shit. Then give up that $5MM to the school from our AD too.
    Such a waste
    I agree with your overall point, but I'm not sure we don't screw up Skenes some if we get him so not sure if we end up with 8 more wins. Certainly could. Maybe having a true Friday night starter takes the pressure off and we play better defense and all of our pitchers do better because they have better matchups and are in situations more appropriate for their talent. Or maybe having a bunch of innings extended by shit defense gets in Skenes head and he starts to look a little more like the rest of our team. Just hard to predict.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,845
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    If you could keep lemonis and use the buyout money to go get a bunch of pitchers, sign me up for that.

    But you have to sell that to your boosters with the buyout money.
    I don't think that will be a hard sell unless the boosters have a hang up with players making money. THe biggest thing is you have to provide some guarantee that you're not going to come back and ask for a $4M buyout in a year or two anyway. Have to get Lemonis to buy in on having more NIL money but less security after this contract. I would think NIL money with a lower buyout in the future would sound better than a strong likelihood of being fired next year. With that much money for NIL, you'd think he'd be confident he can win enough to keep collecting a high salary and the lower buyout would be irrelevant.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,608
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    I agree with your overall point, but I'm not sure we don't screw up Skenes some if we get him so not sure if we end up with 8 more wins. Certainly could. Maybe having a true Friday night starter takes the pressure off and we play better defense and all of our pitchers do better because they have better matchups and are in situations more appropriate for their talent. Or maybe having a bunch of innings extended by shit defense gets in Skenes head and he starts to look a little more like the rest of our team. Just hard to predict.
    Skenes has what? 10 wins this year? I gave away two of his wins for defense etc.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    4,209
    vCash
    3100
    5 or 6 more SEC wins around .500 SEC record with Skenes.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,845
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    Skenes has what? 10 wins this year? I gave away two of his wins for defense etc.
    But it's not like we didn't win any Friday night games either. Excluding LSU, we have gone 3-9 in Friday night games by my count. In those ten losses, we've scored 1 against Auburn , 2 against Ole Miss and Arkansas, 3 against Vandy, 3 against OSU, 4 against USCe, 4 against Arizona, 5 against UK, 7 against UT. We certainly would have won more games with Skenes pitching, but with our run support, we could have gone 10-3 instead of 3-10 (counting LSU), or it could have been more like 7-6 instead of 3-10. If we don't make Skenes worse, and our team gains some confidence from having a friday night ace, it could be a 12 or 14 game difference by the time you count game 2 or 3's we would have won because of having better pitching available. IF Foxhall makes Skenes a little less effective, and mental mistakes in the field get to him, maybe when it's all said and done we "only" win 6 more even after accounting for game 2 and 3's.

    I'd bet on 8 more wins before I bet on 6 more wins. It's not like we haven't had any transfer pitchers perform fine. Just not convinced it's a certainty.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    4,765
    vCash
    3621
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeshouldveflanked View Post
    5 or 6 more SEC wins around .500 SEC record with Skenes.
    I am just talking smack here; but Skenes would have MSU ranked Top-12, challenging to a National Seed

    (1) he wins more Fridays
    (2) he saves the pen for other games.
    (3) he gives confidence to other MSU pitchers, it's probably demoralizing when the "Ace" is getting shelled
    (4) makes other pitchers more comfortable in their skin, you have a real Alpha predator, the other predators take a comfortable role
    (5) he would have attracted another decent pitcher to transfer

    I think Skenes wins MSU 8 more SEC games directly and indirectly. So you are 16-11 to face TAM this week.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.