-
What has Ark and Aub done this year to warrant their spot so high?
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
R2Dawg
Ark, Mizzou, TAMU
TCU
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
R2Dawg
Well we got in by skin of our teeth.
This or the NIT would not have changed my opinion on this season, nor the staff. This is a massive turn around. Glad they made it though!
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
NCMSTFAN
All the "insiders" on this board need to stop acting like they know what's going on because they don't.
I hate this play in label because technically you?re not in the field of 64. We still have to win a game before the tournament starts.. its an extra game to play..I'm glad to be in but I'd prefer to not have to win a game 1st
Exactly
-
Senior Member
Wow.....thought Memphis was a lot better than a #8 seed.
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
SailingDawg
TCU
Marquette (a 2-seed)
-
We didn't get the credit auburn, Arkansas, Kentucky get. It's weird they value the league but not us. A&M and mizzou have seeding gripes as well
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
SailingDawg
Where is ole miss going?
Also, name the SEC teams we beat that are a higher seed:
Arkansas, Mizzou, and A&M.
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
chef dixon
We didn't get the credit auburn, Arkansas, Kentucky get. It's weird they value the league but not us. A&M and mizzou have seeding gripes as well
Those teams had more Q1 opportunities. They all played in early season tournaments and neutral site one off games with Q1 teams. It also hurt us that we had to play Ole Miss and USCe twice because those were Q2 and Q4 wins at the end of the day.
-
I’m surprised Rutgers didn’t get in Lunardi had them around the same place we were most of the last few weeks
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
chef dixon
We didn't get the credit auburn, Arkansas, Kentucky get. It's weird they value the league but not us. A&M and mizzou have seeding gripes as well
I've been saying this for the past few weeks. We didn't help ourselves losing to Bama the way we did either
-
Marq and TCU wins got us in tourney.
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
NCMSTFAN
I've been saying this for the past few weeks. We didn't help ourselves losing to Bama the way we did either
TAMU basically got beat the same.
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
SailingDawg
TCU
Yeah but he asked SEC.
Marq and TCU were massive wins for us. Drake win would have moved us up nicely too if we had gotten it.
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
PGHBulldogBG
I’m surprised Rutgers didn’t get in Lunardi had them around the same place we were most of the last few weeks
The bubble teams always have a legit gripe. TAMU got screwed last year.
-
So are we claiming an NCAA tournament appearance with this seeding?
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Activated Alpha
So are we claiming an NCAA tournament appearance with this seeding?
Absolutely. It's our 12th
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Activated Alpha
So are we claiming an NCAA tournament appearance with this seeding?
Yes because technically it is.
-
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Activated Alpha
So are we claiming an NCAA tournament appearance with this seeding?
Well, it?s not the NIT and yes, we?re playing a game after the season is over by an invitation from the NCAA. What else would you call it?
-
And Kentucky get a better seed than aTm.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.