Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: Catching

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,290
    vCash
    3700

    Catching

    For discussion not a riot.
    I'm not saying highfill isn't our future. And maybe sooner rather than later. Moreso bc we are better at first when he catches. And I get they have run on Luke more, Mostly bc of more opportunities, combined with poor times to the plate and other factors. With all that said Hancock has 5 starts one pb. Highfill has 3 starts and 5 pb. Again just food for thought.
    Last edited by Homedawg; 02-26-2023 at 11:14 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,249
    vCash
    3100
    Homedawg gets it! Highfill has a high ceiling and is gonna be good but he's still to jittery and not settled enough back there, yet. SEC pitchers a little different than high school pitchers. He'll adjust with time but once again more to catching than just throwing, way more! Luke's a better receiver and blocks better right now, but as Homedawg said Luke at first makes our defense better too. Great post!

  3. #3
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    6,380
    vCash
    98074
    Agree with all points. Luke started the season back there because he was a better receiver. Otherwise it would've been Highfill. Highfill needs to be catching one to two games a weekend still so that we can get him acclimated and continue to refine his receiving skills behind the plate so that hopefully by April he's our full-time guy back there and we can move Hancock to weekdays and maybe one game a weekend here and there.

    Luke needs to stay in the lineup though. His bat has been great so far this year.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,290
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Agree with all points. Luke started the season back there because he was a better receiver. Otherwise it would've been Highfill. Highfill needs to be catching one to two games a weekend still so that we can get him acclimated and continue to refine his receiving skills behind the plate so that hopefully by April he's our full-time guy back there and we can move Hancock to weekdays and maybe one game a weekend here and there.

    Luke needs to stay in the lineup though. His bat has been great so far this year.
    I think splitting time is what they are gonna do or close. But that's my opinion. Pros and cons want way we go. Give up offense here. Get defense there. Give up defense here take it there. It's a puzzle. Who is pitching is important. For the opposing team and for us....

  5. #5
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,249
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    I think splitting time is what they are gonna do or close. But that's my opinion. Pros and cons want way we go. Give up offense here. Get defense there. Give up defense here take it there. It's a puzzle. Who is pitching is important. For the opposing team and for us....
    Agree on all.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,466
    vCash
    3700
    Back when Highfill flipped to us, the story was that he had tons of upside but was a late bloomer and had alot of work to do and polishing up before he would be ready. He is probably further along at this point that I was expecting though. Hopefully we have plenty of low pressure opportunities to get him time behind the plate.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,401
    vCash
    3700
    Didn't Luke throw some people out this weekend? Or am I making that up?

  8. #8
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,401
    vCash
    3700
    I think ideally you would want Highfill and Hancock to split the load. We may have to match it up based on how much a team runs too. Catching in this league as a freshman is really tough.

    Highfill has hit pretty well but I like our lineup better offensively with this group:

    C- Hancock
    1B- Hines- he needs to work on his defense anyway
    2B- Larry
    3B- Alford
    SS- Forsythe
    LF- Jordan
    CF- Ledbetter
    RF- Clark
    DH- Chance

  9. #9
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    6,380
    vCash
    98074
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    Didn't Luke throw some people out this weekend? Or am I making that up?
    He technically threw 1 out, although it was a terrible decision because he let the run score on the 2 out double steal. Teams are 17-19 on SB attempts on him this year.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,249
    vCash
    3100
    They said on the broadcast today no sec team has thrown out more than 2 base runners so far this year. Everyone's getting run on because pitchers aren't interested in holding runners only on how hard they can throw. Holding runners is becoming a lost art.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Lord McBuckethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,003
    vCash
    3086
    Look, in SEC world, every single is going to be a double. Runners will take third if there is less than one out. Hancock hasn?t been close in 17 of 19 throws. Hasn?t sniffed the panties of throwing someone out.

  12. #12
    Senior Member BrunswickDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Home of Slay, GA
    Posts
    11,951
    vCash
    1746501
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    They said on the broadcast today no sec team has thrown out more than 2 base runners so far this year. Everyone's getting run on because pitchers aren't interested in holding runners only on how hard they can throw. Holding runners is becoming a lost art.
    The pitch clock is giving any decent runner an advantage. Pitchers are focusing on that instead of runners and they are getting better leads and jumps. Catchers stand no chance. Steals are up across the board and as you said, no SEC team has more than 2 CS by catchers.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,401
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    They said on the broadcast today no sec team has thrown out more than 2 base runners so far this year. Everyone's getting run on because pitchers aren't interested in holding runners only on how hard they can throw. Holding runners is becoming a lost art.
    Interesting.

    At some point the bio mechanical side of the game has to intersect with the fundamentals.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    1,826
    vCash
    3000
    the clock is ticking......gotta get the ball to the plate

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,037
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    They said on the broadcast today no sec team has thrown out more than 2 base runners so far this year. Everyone's getting run on because pitchers aren't interested in holding runners only on how hard they can throw. Holding runners is becoming a lost art.
    Pitch clock working in favor of runners too

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,037
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by BrunswickDawg View Post
    The pitch clock is giving any decent runner an advantage. Pitchers are focusing on that instead of runners and they are getting better leads and jumps. Catchers stand no chance. Steals are up across the board and as you said, no SEC team has more than 2 CS by catchers.
    This is dead on. Pitchers need to throw over just to reset the clock

  17. #17
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,674
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowbell View Post
    This is dead on. Pitchers need to throw over just to reset the clock
    But they only have 3 times to throw over also.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    1,826
    vCash
    3000
    what?

  19. #19
    Senior Member Saltydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,290
    vCash
    3706
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    For discussion not a riot.
    I'm not saying highfill isn't our future. And maybe sooner rather than later. Moreso bc we are better at first when he catches. And I get they have run on Luke more, Mostly bc of more opportunities, combined with poor times to the plate and other factors. With all that said Hancock has 5 starts one pb. Highfill has 3 starts and 5 pb. Again just food for thought.
    Yep and it was a problem in the fall and in the preseason scrimmages as well.
    "The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)

  20. #20
    Senior Member Lord McBuckethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,003
    vCash
    3086
    Quote Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe View Post
    But they only have 3 times to throw over also.
    If that is the case, then they really only have 2 times to throw over. If a pitcher does throw over 3 times, the lead taken will get increased and make stealing even easier. We need a catcher with a snap pick off throw, but by the time that play happens, the runner is 2/3 of the way to 2nd.
    Downvotes_Hype

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.