Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 66

Thread: Hey Commerce

  1. #41
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,377
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowbell View Post
    We would have been better off with some random bench player tossing them 75 mph straight fastballs to atleast give our defense a chance
    It's one of the oldest coaching cliches in the book but so true, There is no defense for a walk. And it always seems like walks are contagious, once it starts it's like no one can throw strikes. Friday and Sunday our pitchers were very competitive and got the job done. Saturday and yesterday not so much.

  2. #42
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,377
    vCash
    3100
    Kudos to Cowbell for starting this thread. This has been a very good baseball discussion without any name calling or insanity(so far, lol). I love these type of discussion threads with all the excellent insights. Good stuff.

    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Cowbell again

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,850
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Ari Gold View Post
    it All starts at the top
    That post game press conference told me a lot and It was weak

    You are either coaching it or allowing it to happen..

    Clock is ticking on this staff, shit better get fixed ASAP, and I?m not sure you can just flip a switch .. if so he better flip that mother ****er
    Most every team has injuries. Did we have more than our share last year, I don't know but it was stated as an excuse. However, even with injuries there is something wrong when you fall from National Champs to last in your own conference division the next year. Something big may be wrong.

  4. #44
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,091
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by SilentSteel16 View Post
    Another thing that I noticed is we have alot of cross body pitchers. Cross body pitchers are a low statistically slower to home plate and also more susceptible to elbow injuries. I know Dierker made it a well established point of NOT even drafting ?crossers? as he called it.

    FYI, I think it is pretty self explanatory but a cross body pitcher is one who starts on edge of rubber far right for righties and left for lefties and plant and rotate and finish on opposite side.
    I don't think this is correct. A cross-body pitcher is one who goes even further with his plant leg to the side of his pitching arm. So a RHP who is cross-body plants his left leg further toward the 3B side; a cross-body LHP plants his right leg further toward the 1B side.

  5. #45
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    19,265
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowbell View Post
    We would have been better off with some random bench player tossing them 75 mph straight fastballs to atleast give our defense a chance
    Don't understand why you don't throw strikes to a team that can't hit up 10-1. Apparently the answer is because you simply cant.

  6. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,184
    vCash
    3100
    Someone tell me how good is Mershon at the plate?

  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    725
    vCash
    3100
    Lots of good posts in this thread. Hopefully Lemo and the team can get this turned around. One of the things that REALLY concerns me about Fox is the lack of development on the mound. I don't see how Fox survives at this point. How do you recruit top caliber pitching talent if your coach can't point to anyone he's developed recently? You can't.

    Also, FWIW, defense has been a let down for sure but that doesn't concern me yet. I feel like we're pressing right now and those gremlins will work themselves out I feel.

  8. #48
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    6,443
    vCash
    98074
    Quote Originally Posted by BrunswickDawg View Post
    I'm talking from a program perspective, not just this team. We fought thru a metric shit ton of adversity from 2009-2021 and had our best decade in program history and we finally got over the top.
    But, much like we learned in the JoMo experiment, we need a fire breathing dragon running our programs for some reason. Mullen, Vic, the Intense Bastard, and now Jans fit that. Leach was a little different, but he was old school and you didn't **** with that.
    As much as some dislike Cohen the AD, the Intense Bastard could recruit, motivate, and established a culture that carried us through the Cann/Hendo/Lemo transition and got us that CWS ring finally. As much as I though Lemonis' first 3 seasons were carrying that forward, it looks like I may have been wrong and that mojo may be gone.
    We all underestimated how much Rowdey and Tanner meant to the team. After Sims went down no one has ever stepped up to fill that leadership void. From 16-21 we had a solid group of leaders. We haven't had one in over a year though. It's time for a group of 4 or 5 guys to step the F up.

    16- Dakota, Sexton, Reed, Lowe, Kruger, Gavin, and Robson
    17- Rooker, Mangum, Brown, Pilk, Gridley, and Cole
    18- Mangum, Cole, JB, Pilk, Small, LA, Mac, and Stovall
    19- Mangum, Cole, Small, Skelton, Mac, Westburg, and Foscue
    21- Allen, Jordan, Hatcher, Self, and Sims
    22- Sims
    23- None

  9. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,850
    vCash
    3100
    Our recruiting classes have been ranked very highly under this coaching staff, yet we are picked dead last in the coaches's poll this year. Very troubling.

  10. #50
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    6,443
    vCash
    98074
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldendawg View Post
    Our recruiting classes have been ranked very highly under this coaching staff, yet we are picked dead last in the coaches's poll this year. Very troubling.
    Well they are, but 3 or 4 never make it to campus and 5 or 6 transfer out in the first two years so it's great on paper but when you dive into it how many of those players are we getting contributions from? Not many.

    19- #7 class. Signed 18 players. We've gotten production from Sims, Bednar, Logan Tanner, James, and you can throw KC in there as well. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut
    20- #17 class. Signed 17 players. We've gotten production from Kellum Clark, Cade Smith, and Lane Forsythe. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut.
    21- #16 class. Signed 19 players. We've gotten production from Slate Alford, Pico Kohn, and Cole Cheatham. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut.

    The 20 and 21 classes just killed us. Especially 21. A couple didn't make it to campus. We had 2 or 3 transfer before fall ended and almost the entire rest of the class transferred after the season.

  11. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,850
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Well they are, but 3 or 4 never make it to campus and 5 or 6 transfer out in the first two years so it's great on paper but when you dive into it how many of those players are we getting contributions from? Not many.

    19- #7 class. Signed 18 players. We've gotten production from Sims, Bednar, Logan Tanner, James, and you can throw KC in there as well. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut
    20- #17 class. Signed 17 players. We've gotten production from Kellum Clark, Cade Smith, and Lane Forsythe. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut.
    21- #16 class. Signed 19 players. We've gotten production from Slate Alford, Pico Kohn, and Cole Cheatham. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut.

    The 20 and 21 classes just killed us. Especially 21. A couple didn't make it to campus. We had 2 or 3 transfer before fall ended and almost the entire rest of the class transferred after the season.
    Thanks. Meanwhile other SEC teams recruiting better than this I am sure.

  12. #52
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    6,443
    vCash
    98074
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldendawg View Post
    Thanks. Meanwhile other SEC teams recruiting better than this I am sure.
    Yep

    19- #7 class. 5th in the SEC
    20- #17 class. 8th in the SEC
    21- #16 class. 10th in the SEC
    22- #5 class. 3rd in the SEC

  13. #53
    Senior Member BrunswickDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Home of Slay, GA
    Posts
    11,966
    vCash
    1746501
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    It's one of the oldest coaching cliches in the book but so true, There is no defense for a walk. And it always seems like walks are contagious, once it starts it's like no one can throw strikes. Friday and Sunday our pitchers were very competitive and got the job done. Saturday and yesterday not so much.
    I think Lemonis is going to go through the whole staff and see who performs and then look at what roles players fit. It may cost us a few OOC games, but it could pay off in a couple of weeks.
    We turned over this roster, and it may take some time to really see who has it.

    We started a little bit like this in '16 - losing 2 of our first 4 opening weekend, and even ended up losing later to Eastern Kentucky (a game we led 7-1 and lost 12-16 due to a 4 run 10th) and Oral Roberts. Jake Mangum started the first game and looked lost, then only got 1 AB each game until a spot start against OK, and didn't become an every game starter until April.
    "After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
    - Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18

  14. #54
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,091
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Well they are, but 3 or 4 never make it to campus and 5 or 6 transfer out in the first two years so it's great on paper but when you dive into it how many of those players are we getting contributions from? Not many.

    19- #7 class. Signed 18 players. We've gotten production from Sims, Bednar, Logan Tanner, James, and you can throw KC in there as well. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut
    20- #17 class. Signed 17 players. We've gotten production from Kellum Clark, Cade Smith, and Lane Forsythe. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut.
    21- #16 class. Signed 19 players. We've gotten production from Slate Alford, Pico Kohn, and Cole Cheatham. The rest transferred, went in draft, or were cut.

    The 20 and 21 classes just killed us. Especially 21. A couple didn't make it to campus. We had 2 or 3 transfer before fall ended and almost the entire rest of the class transferred after the season.
    I mean, 21 did give us Hunter Hines, too. Bryce Chance and interestingly, Dohm, were also in that class.

  15. #55
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    6,443
    vCash
    98074
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    I mean, 21 did give us Hunter Hines, too.
    You're right. I missed him on the list.

  16. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,414
    vCash
    32000
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    Kudos to Cowbell for starting this thread. This has been a very good baseball discussion without any name calling or insanity(so far, lol). I love these type of discussion threads with all the excellent insights. Good stuff.
    Definitely good, interesting discussion.

  17. #57
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    6,443
    vCash
    98074
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    I mean, 21 did give us Hunter Hines, too. Bryce Chance and interestingly, Dohm, were also in that class.
    Bryce was in that class. I didn't add him because we're only through 4 games. Dohm was added to the class once he transferred. They added Ledbetter to that class as well.

  18. #58
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    1,111
    vCash
    3275
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    I don't think this is correct. A cross-body pitcher is one who goes even further with his plant leg to the side of his pitching arm. So a RHP who is cross-body plants his left leg further toward the 3B side; a cross-body LHP plants his right leg further toward the 1B side.
    No sir, that is incorrect. It literally means there is no center to your stance or follow through, more torque up top and longer elongated motion. Which means more torque on elbow and base runners delight.

  19. #59
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    1,111
    vCash
    3275
    Going downhill is the ideal motion and for most it is slightly open with plant leg from left foot start point on rubber. Follow through with the arm across the body is not necessarily a cross body. I know there are several MLB teams that watch plant foot reps and make their decision on a guy and don’t even watch where the ball ends up …. Sounds crazy but 100 percent true

  20. #60
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    88
    vCash
    8200
    One other factor I see impacting throwing out runners is our pitchers control. If the ball isn't where the catcher expects, it makes their job even harder. I am not saying its the only cause, but its a factor.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.