-
What some of you don't get
When you hire a new HC, he is responsible for the W/L column ultimately. Arnette was hired to win. He wasn't hired to carry on the Leach legacy. He needs to have no excuses for failure which means you let the man do what he thinks is best. He owes us nothing to keep Leech's offense and it's nieve for some of you to think he does.
-
Originally Posted by
Cowbell
When you hire a new HC, he is responsible for the W/L column ultimately. Arnette was hired to win. He wasn't hired to carry on the Leach legacy. He needs to have no excuses for failure which means you let the man do what he thinks is best. He owes us nothing to keep Leech's offense and it's nieve for some of you to think he does.
What I guess some of you don't understand is that my concern has nothing to do with Leach's legacy or his offense. It is about W's and L's.
The offense that we are about to be running is vastly different than what we have run the last 3 years. There will be different weight training, offseason workouts and most importantly personnel needed to run this offense.
I think we will have a salty defense next year, assuming we can replace a few key pieces. Offensively, we just need to be above average and maybe this will do that, but changing styles so much, could be 2018 all over again.
To be clear, I like the offensive system he runs. I just don't know if we have the personnel to run it.
-
Originally Posted by
Cowbell
When you hire a new HC, he is responsible for the W/L column ultimately. Arnette was hired to win. He wasn't hired to carry on the Leach legacy. He needs to have no excuses for failure which means you let the man do what he thinks is best. He owes us nothing to keep Leech's offense and it's nieve for some of you to think he does.
I get it and agree. Seems like a pretty big departure in philosophy to me tho ... but I ain't sure yet. Right now we got a lot of folks coming back and could have a better year than this year maybe ... we'll see.
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
What I guess some of you don't understand is that my concern has nothing to do with Leach's legacy or his offense. It is about W's and L's.
The offense that we are about to be running is vastly different than what we have run the last 3 years. There will be different weight training, offseason workouts and most importantly personnel needed to run this offense.
I think we will have a salty defense next year, assuming we can replace a few key pieces. Offensively, we just need to be above average and maybe this will do that, but changing styles so much, could be 2018 all over again.
To be clear, I like the offensive system he runs. I just don't know if we have the personnel to run it.
You are basing all of your concern on the assumption that we are going to run the exact same offense as app state. Some coaches do adapt....
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
What I guess some of you don't understand is that my concern has nothing to do with Leach's legacy or his offense. It is about W's and L's.
The offense that we are about to be running is vastly different than what we have run the last 3 years. There will be different weight training, offseason workouts and most importantly personnel needed to run this offense.
I think we will have a salty defense next year, assuming we can replace a few key pieces. Offensively, we just need to be above average and maybe this will do that, but changing styles so much, could be 2018 all over again.
To be clear, I like the offensive system he runs. I just don't know if we have the personnel to run it.
We didn't have the personnel to run the air raid either or what Dan wanted when he first got here. Next year will have to be a hybrid O if we are smart and split the difference. Our D is good enough if the O can just be OK we'll win 6-7 again, no issue.
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
What I guess some of you don't understand is that my concern has nothing to do with Leach's legacy or his offense. It is about W's and L's.
The offense that we are about to be running is vastly different than what we have run the last 3 years. There will be different weight training, offseason workouts and most importantly personnel needed to run this offense.
I think we will have a salty defense next year, assuming we can replace a few key pieces. Offensively, we just need to be above average and maybe this will do that, but changing styles so much, could be 2018 all over again.
To be clear, I like the offensive system he runs. I just don't know if we have the personnel to run it.
Nah, that's over the top. We need TEs and a QB(to back up Will or compete). He's put up points, so he will figure it out. Workouts won't change. Same guy is running that. Just different guys and body types coming. We won't see a roster full of slot guys anymore, and that's a positive.
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
What I guess some of you don't understand is that my concern has nothing to do with Leach's legacy or his offense. It is about W's and L's.
The offense that we are about to be running is vastly different than what we have run the last 3 years. There will be different weight training, offseason workouts and most importantly personnel needed to run this offense.
This is a strong staff IMO.
I think we will have a salty defense next year, assuming we can replace a few key pieces. Offensively, we just need to be above average and maybe this will do that, but changing styles so much, could be 2018 all over again.
To be clear, I like the offensive system he runs. I just don't know if we have the personnel to run it.
Nah, that's over the top. We need TEs and a QB(to back up Will or compete). He's put up points, so he will figure it out. Workouts won't change. Same guy is running that. Just different guys and body types coming. We won't see a roster full of slot guys anymore, and that's a positive.
-
Senior Member
It goes back to the JoMo years. Not running what suited the players you had. Just a wait and see on my part
-
Originally Posted by
Cowbell
When you hire a new HC, he is responsible for the W/L column ultimately. Arnette was hired to win. He wasn't hired to carry on the Leach legacy. He needs to have no excuses for failure which means you let the man do what he thinks is best. He owes us nothing to keep Leech's offense and it's nieve for some of you to think he does.
Dead on cowbell. CZA gotta run what he thinks best. I don't even know what that is yet but I hope it has more balance and less predictability and exploits another teams weakness. New coach has always meant changes in plays and philosophy.
-
Originally Posted by
Cowbell
You are basing all of your concern on the assumption that we are going to run the exact same offense as app state. Some coaches do adapt....
You don't hire a guy to run an offense he isn't comfortable running. That makes zero sense. Sure you adapt your offense to the players you have, but he is running his offense, otherwise - why in the hell would you hire him.
Its not like Arnett has an offensive system that he wants the new OC to run.
I expect us to run an offense similiar to what Central Michigan and App State have run. Its roughly a 60/40 run offense that is efficient passing the ball off play action
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
You don't hire a guy to run an offense he isn't comfortable running. That makes zero sense. Sure you adapt your offense to the players you have, but he is running his offense, otherwise - why in the hell would you hire him.
Its not like Arnett has an offensive system that he wants the new OC to run.
I expect us to run an offense similiar to what Central Michigan and App State have run. Its roughly a 60/40 run offense that is efficient passing the ball off play action
You also don't hire a HC and tell him what offense to run
-
Originally Posted by
R2Dawg
We didn't have the personnel to run the air raid either or what Dan wanted when he first got here. Next year will have to be a hybrid O if we are smart and split the difference. Our D is good enough if the O can just be OK we'll win 6-7 again, no issue.
My concern is that you are 100% right. This would be a waste of a season, especially considering the defense should be really good and the schedule is way more favorable. We have a legit shot at 10 wins and after next year, we lose a ton of players that will have used up their extra covid year.
Next year has the potential to be a 10 win season - i don't want to go through a 2018 or 2020 season while we adjust our entire offense.
Last edited by HancockCountyDog; 01-12-2023 at 11:59 AM.
-
Originally Posted by
Desoto1967
It goes back to the JoMo years. Not running what suited the players you had. Just a wait and see on my part
JoMo could have adapted his offense to what we had. Hud and the OL coach under JoMo tried to show him that. That's why we beat the snot outta AU and A&M that year. JoMo flat out refused to change his scheme to accommodate what he had on his roster.
-
I need more research but I share your concerns. I'm not seeing tempo, I'm not seeing multiple formations, I'm not seeing creative QB runs which is good for Will but not good long term.
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
You also don't hire a HC and tell him what offense to run
Don't you wish we had told JOMO what offense to run?
My concern is that coaches can be hard headed and will waste a potentially really good defense while we completely overhaul the offense. I was all for adapting our offense to have more run plays, that was essential, but this is going from Air Raid to Ground and Pound.
Any objective look at the stats at Central Michigan and App State would confirm that.
The one thing I do like though is that he has not required a running QB.
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Don't you wish we had told JOMO what offense to run?
My concern is that coaches can be hard headed and will waste a potentially really good defense while we completely overhaul the offense. I was all for adapting our offense to have more run plays, that was essential, but this is going from Air Raid to Ground and Pound.
Any objective look at the stats at Central Michigan and App State would confirm that.
The one thing I do like though is that he has not required a running QB.
No, I think a HC should be able to do it exactly how he wants. I have very little patience though, so I wouldn't tell him to fire an OC or something later... I'd just fire him. If we believed in ZA as the HC, then I want him to have full reign to sink or swim
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Don't you wish we had told JOMO what offense to run?
My concern is that coaches can be hard headed and will waste a potentially really good defense while we completely overhaul the offense. I was all for adapting our offense to have more run plays, that was essential, but this is going from Air Raid to Ground and Pound.
Any objective look at the stats at Central Michigan and App State would confirm that.
The one thing I do like though is that he has not required a running QB.
The good news is, if he sucks, Arnett can go find a new OC. That's the upside of a defensive head coach
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
What I guess some of you don't understand is that my concern has nothing to do with Leach's legacy or his offense. It is about W's and L's.
The offense that we are about to be running is vastly different than what we have run the last 3 years. There will be different weight training, offseason workouts and most importantly personnel needed to run this offense.
I think we will have a salty defense next year, assuming we can replace a few key pieces. Offensively, we just need to be above average and maybe this will do that, but changing styles so much, could be 2018 all over again.
To be clear, I like the offensive system he runs. I just don't know if we have the personnel to run it.
Most of us told everyone on this board Multiple Times when we hired Leach that we would be right here where we are today. Obviously, no one expected Leach to pass away. Most of us figured he'd be here 5 years at max and then we would be revamping the offense. Well, it's happened just like we said it would. That offense was run by one person in the world. MSU recruits players that spend their entire lives running a run spread type offense.
Had Mullen been a better play caller and not scared to death, we would have played in the SECCG a couple times with his offense. And no, I'm not saying run the Mullen offense.
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
The good news is, if he sucks, Arnett can go find a new OC. That's the upside of a defensive head coach
Imagine that!!! Brilliant simplicity!!!
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
The good news is, if he sucks, Arnett can go find a new OC. That's the upside of a defensive head coach
Downside is that you have so many more offensive schemes and terminology, that when one leaves you have to rebuild the offensive roster and learn a new language.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.