Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: There's 2 known candidates - briles and nagle

  1. #1
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,078
    vCash
    10439

    There's 2 known candidates - briles and nagle

    At least that I know about.

    Briles was 63% run heavy
    Nagle (assuming he did call plays) was 60% run heavy

    Qb runs minus sacks....
    Briles - 165 (29% of rush att)
    Nagle - 109 (20% of rush att)

    Looks like arnett wants to be run heavy with a dual qb

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    1,147
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    At least that I know about.

    Briles was 63% run heavy
    Nagle (assuming he did call plays) was 60% run heavy

    Qb runs minus sacks....
    Briles - 165 (29% of rush att)
    Nagle - 109 (20% of rush att)

    Looks like arnett wants to be run heavy with a dual qb
    Will Rogers trying to run a read option.......

  3. #3
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,025
    vCash
    17200
    Obviously the idea would be to install the offense and get by with Rogers as much as possible. Hit the portal for a QB as well as get Parson ready to take over in 2024.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  4. #4
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,578
    vCash
    52714
    Neither will be our OC

  5. #5
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    24,717
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Obviously the idea would be to install the offense and get by with Rogers as much as possible. Hit the portal for a QB as well as get Parson ready to take over in 2024.
    This. No OC is gonna run Will Rogers.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Coursesuper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,336
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    At least that I know about.

    Briles was 63% run heavy
    Nagle (assuming he did call plays) was 60% run heavy

    Qb runs minus sacks....
    Briles - 165 (29% of rush att)
    Nagle - 109 (20% of rush att)

    Looks like arnett wants to be run heavy with a dual qb
    I would be willing to say that any info regarding who the OC is going be is taken with a grain of salt at his point.

  7. #7
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,078
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Coursesuper View Post
    I would be willing to say that any info regarding who the OC is going be is taken with a grain of salt at his point.
    Maybe so, but we know for sure briles was offered

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,253
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Obviously the idea would be to install the offense and get by with Rogers as much as possible. Hit the portal for a QB as well as get Parson ready to take over in 2024.
    Why can't people get this? No matter who the hire is. The coordinator will have to be different this year w WR than he he will w whoever the next qb is.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Coursesuper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,336
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Maybe so, but we know for sure briles was offered
    Very true, but there was talk about that one, not a peep since then.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,578
    vCash
    52714
    We're going to hire an OC that has some passing background on his resume. Certainly not Leach-like, but we aren't going straight pound it either. I think people are going to be pleasantly surprised.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.