Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 89

Thread: New OC name of interest- Slade Nagle

  1. #21
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,578
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    I missed it where we hired him.... bobo was our hire remember
    That's kinda my point. He's not it. Or, as I said before, we're going to have co-oc. My concern is losing players if this doesn't go right. We sure seem bent on a more run heavy offense and that's going to cost us big time if true.

  2. #22
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,074
    vCash
    52060
    By play count (not yardage), Tulane was 60-40 run this year. I don't think we should try that here, basically ever, but especially not with our current personnel.

  3. #23
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    10,784
    vCash
    966500
    Nahhhh I'm good

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,253
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgface View Post
    That's disappointing as far as I'm concerned. Tweaking was what I was hoping for but hey....I'm just one in the minority I guess.
    What I mean is, no matter what we change to it's changing in a big way. Nobody besides CML ran what we did. Nobody. Nothing close.

  5. #25
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,078
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    By play count (not yardage), Tulane was 60-40 run this year. I don't think we should try that here, basically ever, but especially not with our current personnel.
    2 teams that we compare to favorably in the sec talent-wise, OM and ark both run the ball at 60%. Both finished in top
    5 of sec in total offense, both finished top 6 in conf only games, and both finished top 15 nationally. Here's our ranks...

    Sec all games - 8th
    Conf only - 11th
    Nationally - 62nd

  6. #26
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,074
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    2 teams that we compare to favorably in the sec talent-wise, OM and ark both run the ball at 60%. Both finished in top
    5 of sec in total offense, both finished top 6 in conf only games, and both finished top 15 nationally. Here's our ranks...

    Sec all games - 8th
    Conf only - 11th
    Nationally - 62nd
    And they both finished unranked, unlike us.

  7. #27
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,078
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    And they both finished unranked, unlike us.
    Total def nationally...
    OM #75
    Ark #124

    Offense wasn't losing them games, and offense wasn't winning us games
    Last edited by msstate7; 01-10-2023 at 11:32 PM.

  8. #28
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,666
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    And they both finished unranked, unlike us.
    Was that because of their offense or defense though? And I'm more in line with being closer to 50/50 with what we have coming back and an OC that's adaptable to his personnel. But their records are more indicative of poor defenses than offenses. Ark was 13th in the league and OM 9th

  9. #29
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Covington County Mississippi
    Posts
    10,753
    vCash
    1540588
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    I missed it where we hired him.... bobo was our hire remember
    Hahaha!!!

  10. #30
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,668
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Total def nationally...
    OM #75
    Ark #124

    Offense wasn't losing them games, and offense wasn't winning us games
    Exactly.

    Too many are getting hung up on keeping a pass happy offense the longer this OC hire takes. People forget that the offense didn't win us many, if any, games this year. They were the reason we didn't win more. I'm personally not too worried yet, and won't be until I see the hire...because there is little room to go but up on that side of the ball. Arnett is probably thinking, "even if we aren't good on offense, if we can at least be a little more balanced maybe my defense won't be exhausted while trying to win us the game". Hard to blame him after watching how putrid the offense has been the last few years.
    I'm still quietly hoping we may get Johns from Duke, though at this point I doubt it or he would have already been hired.

  11. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,253
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Total def nationally...
    OM #75
    Ark #124

    Offense wasn't losing them games, and offense wasn't winning us games
    Great post

  12. #32
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Covington County Mississippi
    Posts
    10,753
    vCash
    1540588
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Total def nationally...
    OM #75
    Ark #124

    Offense wasn't losing them games, and offense wasn't winning us games
    Nailed it.

  13. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,003
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    Tulane played the 65th SOS and that's with USC included. They played a terrible schedule.
    And they would have beaten us had we played. With much less talent. And less fan and NIL SUPPORT.

  14. #34
    Bennie Brown Know-It-All
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,915
    vCash
    3138
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    And they both finished unranked, unlike us.
    Because they had 2 of the worst defenses in the conference. Anyone that watched our offense this year and wanted to keep doing that stupid shit is a glutton for punishment. Arnett’s defense saved our team’s ass all year. Our offense against anyone with a pulse was horrible.

  15. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,003
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    And they both finished unranked, unlike us.
    If this is your argument, tell me where Tulane finished in the final poll......

  16. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,003
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    I don't know who I the hell we hire. But we will be active in the te portal. And that doesn't tell me or anyone else what type of offense we are going to run.
    With $$$??? Because I will donate more for this

  17. #37
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,074
    vCash
    52060
    I don't think "I don't think we should shift to a 60% run offense" is an equivalent argument to "I want to keep this exact offense we had in 2022 with Rogers," even as some of you are trying to spin it that way.

  18. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    208
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    Tulane played the 65th SOS and that's with USC included. They played a terrible schedule.
    Similar to Washington, UCLA, and UCF. We all still acknowledge that those offenses are good.

    Significantly better SOS than Duke, and people obviously aren?t holding that against Johns.

  19. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    11,942
    vCash
    427176943
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    I missed it where we hired him.... bobo was our hire remember
    Steve throwing Darts again.

  20. #40
    Senior Member Maroonthirteen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    6,007
    vCash
    4388
    At this point, MSU football will take anyone they can get....run or pass philosophy.

    We are talking about a guy that has been a career position coach at a G5 and lesser.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.