Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 48 of 48

Thread: As a 100 % conservative I vote for socialism in College Football

  1. #41
    Ever Been to Gloster?? cheewgumm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    3,348
    vCash
    2981
    I propose STAR CAP

    Take an average of star ratings.

    Limit the star ratings that a team can have - five 5 stars
    - ten 4 stars
    - twenty 3 stars

    Something like the above.

    Etc.

    You do not have to worry about people paying more than a salary cap, etc?pay whatever you want?you are still limited to a certain number of stars.

    This would fix it but ?they? do not want it fixed. They want eyeballs on TV. The end.

    This would lead to more $ in time though.

  2. #42
    Senior Member Maverick91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    2,091
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by cheewgumm View Post
    I propose STAR CAP

    Take an average of star ratings.

    Limit the star ratings that a team can have - five 5 stars
    - ten 4 stars
    - twenty 3 stars

    Something like the above.

    Etc.

    You do not have to worry about people paying more than a salary cap, etc?pay whatever you want?you are still limited to a certain number of stars.

    This would fix it but ?they? do not want it fixed. They want eyeballs on TV. The end.

    This would lead to more $ in time though.

    FYI I have proposed this numerous of times and is shot down worst than warm piss. I agree with you fwiw!

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Madison, MS
    Posts
    979
    vCash
    3187
    Playing devils advocate here:

    What is to keep schools from altering or pressuring the people/groups who rate high school athletes, from "de-rating" the normally 5-star athletes to 3 stars? I think this will open up another level of influence peddling and cheating.

    I am with you though, that something needs to be done!

  4. #44
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by Extendedcab View Post
    Playing devils advocate here:

    What is to keep schools from altering or pressuring the people/groups who rate high school athletes, from "de-rating" the normally 5-star athletes to 3 stars? I think this will open up another level of influence peddling and cheating.

    I am with you though, that something needs to be done!
    Yep... The REC will just have the "Bammer Bump" removed from all the 5 star commits, have em pushed down to 4 stars, then sign more 5 stars, and so on down the line....
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  5. #45
    Ever Been to Gloster?? cheewgumm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    3,348
    vCash
    2981
    That is fine...

    Bama ( or whever) can convice 5 or so rating agencies to lower their rankings so they can sign another 4 star guy. Great. That is a lot harder than stopping Bama ( or whever) from paying more than the salary cap.

    This is the BEST answer.

  6. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    618
    vCash
    1003100
    Q:
    Since NIL is here would it really even matter if they cut scholarships from 85 to 70. Teams can sign as many as they want to NIL deals, correct.

  7. #47
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,666
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by TALL DAWG View Post
    Q:
    Since NIL is here would it really even matter if they cut scholarships from 85 to 70. Teams can sign as many as they want to NIL deals, correct.
    If it's a player with scholarship offers at the same level, they have to count against the number.

  8. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,038
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by TALL DAWG View Post
    Q:
    Since NIL is here would it really even matter if they cut scholarships from 85 to 70. Teams can sign as many as they want to NIL deals, correct.
    Correct. These guys making scholly reduction suggestions ain't seeing the big picture. Bama will have 100 players if they want them now. Tusk weed money gonna put some kids through college.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.