-
As a 100 % conservative I vote for socialism in College Football
We absolutely have to level the playing field to make the game more competitive!
-
There's a reason the NFL gets higher ratings, even when it seems to obvious to most of us that college football is more compelling.
-
Wanna change it? Don't watch it.
-
Professional sports figured this out a long time ago. It's why attendance has declined every year for the last 10 years in cfb. Costs rising to attend games and only about 5-6 teams have a shot at winning it all. Rest of us just playing for bowl order.
-
Originally Posted by
CaptainObvious
We absolutely have to level the playing field to make the game more competitive!
Dude, you just got it,,,, The 2nd best team just won the thing, man...
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Originally Posted by
TUSK
Dude, you just got it,,,, The 2nd best team just won the thing, man...
Are you saying that Ohio State should've won last week????
-
Originally Posted by
TUSK
Dude, you just got it,,,, The 2nd best team just won the thing, man...
Dude. If only that tornado had hit Bryant Denny and wiped it out and not hurt a single soul!
Maybe next Tornado will do the trick!
-
Originally Posted by
CaptainObvious
Dude. If only that tornado had hit Bryant Denny and wiped it out and not hurt a single soul!
Maybe next Tornado will do the trick!
This, people, is how you do it!!!
CO, I love it! Well executed!
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Lower scholarships from 85 to 70.
This is an easy fix that'll make a huge difference
-
Originally Posted by
KOdawg1
Lower scholarships from 85 to 70.
This is an easy fix that'll make a huge difference
Will never happen. They’re not about to cut 2,000+ scholarships.
-
Originally Posted by
KOdawg1
Lower scholarships from 85 to 70.
This is an easy fix that'll make a huge difference
I believe 65 would be a better number
-
Originally Posted by
KOdawg1
Lower scholarships from 85 to 70.
This is an easy fix that'll make a huge difference
Scholarships matter little when boosters can pay a player anything they want. Hell, teams like Bama and Texas could have zero scholarships and still field a better team than half of hte SEC.
-
Originally Posted by
KOdawg1
Lower scholarships from 85 to 70.
This is an easy fix that'll make a huge difference
Makes too much sense
-
Is the issue the SEC just that much better than the rest of college football?
College football here is just another level than the other conferences.
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Makes too much sense
The critics will argue that's 2000 (131 x 15) kids that don't get a scholarship that would have. Not saying I agree, but that's what that they will say.
I still think you let less transfer. If you sign a kid, it's a 4-year commitment. If he leaves, you lose that scholarship.
-
Pass a rule that says every NIL dollar has to be routed through the school's official NIL fund and enforce it harshly, both by the NCAA and the IRS.
Install an MLB-style "luxury tax" that transfers some NIL funds from the higher $ schools in a conference to the lower $ in a conference. Not in-between conferences transfers, just moving money around within the conferences, to make each conference more competitive.
Allow transfers without sitting out a year only when transferring from a school to a lower NIL cap. Talent should trickle down, not up. If you transfer to a school with a higher NIL cap, you have to sit out a year.
Those 3 things would help a lot and make the product on the field more interesting without totally overthrowing the social order.
-
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
Pass a rule that says every NIL dollar has to be routed through the school's official NIL fund and enforce it harshly, both by the NCAA and the IRS.
Install an MLB-style "luxury tax" that transfers some NIL funds from the higher $ schools in a conference to the lower $ in a conference. Not in-between conferences transfers, just moving money around within the conferences, to make each conference more competitive.
Allow transfers without sitting out a year only when transferring from a school to a lower NIL cap. Talent should trickle down, not up. If you transfer to a school with a higher NIL cap, you have to sit out a year.
Those 3 things would help a lot and make the product on the field more interesting without totally overthrowing the social order.
This is the ticket.
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
The critics will argue that's 2000 (131 x 15) kids that don't get a scholarship that would have. Not saying I agree, but that's what that they will say.
I still think you let less transfer. If you sign a kid, it's a 4-year commitment. If he leaves, you lose that scholarship.
No what this would do is raise all boats. Those kids will find out that D1, D2, NAIA, D3 are all really good competition and the ones that will be bumped down to those levels will still get scholarships.
-
Originally Posted by
CaptainObvious
We absolutely have to level the playing field to make the game more competitive!
So you're saying we should dig up Che's hacked up body from Bolivia and appoint him head of the NCAA?****
-
Originally Posted by
BeardoMSU
So you're saying we should dig up Che's hacked up body from Bolivia and appoint him head of the NCAA?****
I hate you so much************
that was well executed, commie rad:;
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.