Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
I guess here is This is Leach's 1st 8 win season- achieved in Y3- while Mullen did it in Y2.

Leach may get it back to that point- but it's not there yet.
Ok, let's talk about Y3 then. What is the excuse for Mullen's Y3? He Had to beat a terrible OM team to get bowl eligible at 6-6 and went 2-6 in the SEC.

Leach on the other hand won 8 in the regular season and went 4-4 in the SEC in Y3, which matches Mullen's best season in that span.

So, the argument is that Mullen was superior because he had an extra win in year 2 than Leach in year 3, but don't bring up that he regressed in year 3 while Leach has improved his win totals every season 🤔