-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
"Fireable offense".
People need to understand that these are freshman and they need time to develop unless they are a phenom like Peyton Manning.
This. He was in with the rest of the 3rd stringers. Do the backups get many reps during practice? Who is the QB coach who is responsible for QB development\?
-
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
I don't care how "exciting" or "boring" our offense is as long as we win games at the Mullen Baseline Level (MBL) or better.
I wouldn't care either if we were winning at a high level, but we aren't. We're right where Moorhead was
Moorhead 14-12 (.538)
Leach 18-17 (.514)
Mullen (.600)
-
Originally Posted by
TrapGame
Almost two years in the system and he's still this bad. Wow. 4* kid that broke records at his high school.
Myles Brennan broke all of Dylan Farvres records. Both were outstanding in college. ****
-
Originally Posted by
parabrave
This. He was in with the rest of the 3rd stringers. Do the backups get many reps during practice? Who is the QB coach who is responsible for QB development\?
3rd stringers get no reps outside of scout team, and Leach is the QB coach.
"We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.
-
Originally Posted by
DownwardDawg
Myles Brennan broke all of Dylan Farvres records. Both were outstanding in college. ****
Ol' Dylan. I knew he was transferring about 4 months before most everyone else because I had a class with him that fall semester and he showed up a whopping "Zero" times. At least he was consistent lol!
"We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
I wouldn't care either if we were winning at a high level, but we aren't. We're right where Moorhead was
Moorhead 14-12 (.538)
Leach 18-17 (.514)
Mullen (.600)
We are definitely right where DM was in year 3:
Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach (projected): 18-18 - 10-16
(Throw in a New Mexico, Tulane & Alabama A&M and take out UGA, Vandy for 2020 Covid year and here are your records)
Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach- 21-18 - 9-15
-
Originally Posted by
Leeshouldveflanked
And we see why Sawyer don?t get on the field
Will is it. And no doubt that Lovertich is the backup. He looked smoother on his 2 drives behind the 2?s then Robertson did. 1/3 of our special teams still sucks. After today, we now have 6 punts that have traveled less than 20 yards. We never got a kickoff into the end zone today with no wind blowing. And we had 9 kickoffs. Missed a 49 yards field by about 9 yards. The return team is outstanding.
-
Originally Posted by
Turfdawg67
We are definitely right where DM was in year 3:
Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach (projected): 18-18 - 10-16
(Throw in a New Mexico, Tulane & Alabama A&M and take out UGA, Vandy for 2020 Covid year and here are your records)
Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach- 21-18 - 9-15
Throw in at NC State as well for 21-19. Conference record would be the same though. I would argue Leach has had a tougher conference schedule because Mullen's first three years were before expansion.
"We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.
-
Originally Posted by
Turfdawg67
We are definitely right where DM was in year 3:
Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach (projected): 18-18 - 10-16
(Throw in a New Mexico, Tulane & Alabama A&M and take out UGA, Vandy for 2020 Covid year and here are your records)
Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach- 21-18 - 9-15
Did they start at the same point?
3 years prior to mullen: 15-22
3 years prior to leach: 22-16
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
Did they start at the same point?
3 years prior to mullen: 15-22
3 years prior to leach: 22-16
I won't argue, especially when you consider the fact that Mullen had a grand total of FOUR scholarship receivers in his first spring practice. Had to convert DB's and walk on QB's just to get reps.
"We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.
-
Originally Posted by
msu15
Throw in at NC State as well for 21-19. Conference record would be the same though. I would argue Leach has had a tougher conference schedule because Mullen's first three years were before expansion.
Lol, mullen had the toughest schedule in the country year #1. Year 2, auburn was national champs, lsu #8, bama #10, and ark #12. In year 3, bama #1, lsu #2, and ark #5
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
He didn't need to
And there is 3 safeties too.
-
Sawyer .....
Originally Posted by
BuckyIsAB****
And there is 3 safeties too.
2 of 6 for 5 yards! Amazing just amazing!
Coach34 .. "We're not hiring the ****ing Pirate at Miss State. GTFO"
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
I wouldn't care either if we were winning at a high level, but we aren't. We're right where Moorhead was
Moorhead 14-12 (.538)
Leach 18-17 (.514)
Mullen (.600)
Moorhead had major off-the-field issues and had squandered a team with 3 first round picks on it. The fact that he won some anyway almost saved his job, but we all knew it was only going to get worse. Leach at least seems like he will keep up the MBL.
-
Originally Posted by
msu15
Throw in at NC State as well for 21-19. Conference record would be the same though. I would argue Leach has had a tougher conference schedule because Mullen's first three years were before expansion.
That's a losing argument. The SEC West in 2010-2011 was historically the most difficult division ever in college football. Throw in SOS for his first year in 2009...Mullen's first 3 years was a lot more difficult. It's not close.
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
Lol, mullen had the toughest schedule in the country year #1. Year 2, auburn was national champs, lsu #8, bama #10, and ark #12. In year 3, bama #1, lsu #2, and ark #5
Not sure what's funny: 2020- Bama#1, TAM#4 & UGA#7; 2021- Bama#2, OM#11, UK#21, Ark#21 & TAM#26; 2022- UGA#1, Bama#6, LSU#8 & OM#14
That's pretty tough too.
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
Lol, mullen had the toughest schedule in the country year #1. Year 2, auburn was national champs, lsu #8, bama #10, and ark #12. In year 3, bama #1, lsu #2, and ark #5
Lol, Houston and Georgia Tech had a lot to do with his year one schedule, but I shouldn't have jumped in to your debate. Your iQ isn't high enough to carry on a conversation with.
"We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.
-
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
That's a losing argument. The SEC West in 2010-2011 was historically the most difficult division ever in college football. Throw in SOS for his first year in 2009...Mullen's first 3 years was a lot more difficult. It's not close.
Lol... again, see above. You act like Leach has played a simple schedule compared to Mullen. You only mention the West, Leach has faced a juggernaut in UGA in 2 of 3 years where Dan played horrible UK teams and Vandy.
-
Originally Posted by
tcdog70
Guess you would rather have Billy Napier? How can you bitch after this game.. or maybe Jimbo.
They, [B]would have given,[B] their right ----------- a few years ago.
0, zero, naught patience!
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
I wouldn't care either if we were winning at a high level, but we aren't. We're right where Moorhead was
Moorhead 14-12 (.538)
Leach 18-17 (.514)
Mullen (.600)
Hey, don't bring facts in here.
Well we are better culture wise I think than Moorhead.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.