-
Originally Posted by
CoachT14
In conference we are actually only averaging about 20.5. The other points are coming from the defense ironically.
I knew it was lower but the site I gave from my phone app uses total points for scoring. Its still a comparison because it's the same for all seasons.
-
Originally Posted by
DeltaChicagoDog
Nicky Fitz mentioned one possibility in their latest podcast episode - The Has Been & the Never Was.
Gist please?
-
Maybe leech wants to be fired, collect his money and head to the beach.
-
Originally Posted by
TrapGame
Leach has his problems but if Will is staring down a wide open receiver and NOT throwing the ball he needs to be benched. There was a thread over on Gene's where a couple of guys that were at AU broke down a dozen plays in the second half where we had receivers wide open. A couple of those were probably easy touchdowns. Will dumped it off to the RB on most of those plays. The others he just chunked he ball out of bounds.
And you know Leach and other coaches see this in the film room too. Let Sawyer or whomever start next game and let Will come off the bench... maybe that'll restart some fire?!?
-
Originally Posted by
RiverCityDawg
Nick has actually been very defensive of Rogers.
One thing most of us don't know is whether Will is working through his reads correctly. In the Air Raid system there's a saying that "the reads are sacred". You can't see the entire field at the same time, so it doesn't matter if a guy is open before or after the read gets you there. He is coached to follow the reads. It could very well be that he's following the reads he's being coached and that's why Leach hasn't been too hard on him, whereas he's been pretty vocal about the receivers. This would make the problem more if a scheme issue than a Will issue.
Clearly there's been some adjustments by defenses since the Kentucky game where no one is doing the the rush 3 drop 8 thing anymore. I'm not saying Will is playing well, only that it's very possible that he's following the reads as they're being coached, he's just not being coached well right now based on how defenses have been playing us.
I can't imagine that the offense is designed to immediately check it down to a running back very often. I don't think the Air Raid is much different than most other offenses as far as reads go. Especially with it being based off of the BYU offense under LaVell Edwards.
People are typically rushing four most of the time and using stunts and things like that. Georgia was leaving the middle of the field wide open. Once Will started to hit that some things improved.
-
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
In conference only games we are at 25.6. Dan's last 4 years, including 2016 was higher than that. 2014 we actually avg 33.8 in conference games. But 2016 the offense was at 29.3 (Peter Sirmon sucked so si bad) Last year we were 28.5, which was a pretty good year in conference games. We fired Moorehead after his season of 23.3 (although we know that had more to do with culture and problems in the locker room)
ETA. When looking at all games we have to consider that Leach leaves starters in the entire game. Dan pulled starters a whole lot more in blowout wins. That really skews the offensive numbers.
Some of that is because of our schedule. We have played the top four defenses in the SEC in PPG in Georgia, LSU, Kentucky, and Alabama and three of those were on the road. The other three games we've played we've scored 39+ in SEC play.
And even then we scored more on Georgia than their average even taking the punt return out, we scored a touchdown in Alabama for the first time in years while out gaining them, and we had leads on both LSU and Kentucky.
As far as "really good" teams we need to improve on offense- don't get me wrong. But the defense also needs to improve some as well. We allowed 30+ to Georgia, LSU, and Alabama, and then 27 to Kentucky.
If we can average 24 PPG on offense and 24 PPG allowed on defense as a baseline goal against the top teams in the SEC then we will take a big step. That's only one more touchdown and one more stop for some of those games.
-
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
In conference only games we are at 25.6. Dan's last 4 years, including 2016 was higher than that. 2014 we actually avg 33.8 in conference games. But 2016 the offense was at 29.3 (Peter Sirmon sucked so si bad) Last year we were 28.5, which was a pretty good year in conference games. We fired Moorehead after his season of 23.3 (although we know that had more to do with culture and problems in the locker room)
ETA. When looking at all games we have to consider that Leach leaves starters in the entire game. Dan pulled starters a whole lot more in blowout wins. That really skews the offensive numbers.
We also have the toughest league-only schedule of any sec team. And of any team in college football actually.
Last edited by confucius say; 11-18-2022 at 01:54 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
I can't imagine that the offense is designed to immediately check it down to a running back very often. I don't think the Air Raid is much different than most other offenses as far as reads go. Especially with it being based off of the BYU offense under LaVell Edwards.
People are typically rushing four most of the time and using stunts and things like that. Georgia was leaving the middle of the field wide open. Once Will started to hit that some things improved.
The running back is usually the 3rd or 4th read. Sometimes he will drop it off to them right away, which is probably based on what he sees pre-snap. Usually though he's throwing it to the RB after he looks downfield and doesn't like what he sees or pressure is coming and he has to get rid of it.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
We also have the toughest league-only schedule of any sec team. And of any team in college football actually.
Exactly
Not many teams in the nation are doing any better against top four sec defenses. It’s pretty easy to pick at scabs when you play Georgia , Alabama and LSU on the road. Outside of about five teams, the results wouldn’t be any better.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
We also have the toughest league-only schedule of any sec team. And of any team in college football actually.
Stop repeating this lie. We are 11th
http://powerrankingsguru.com/college...f-schedule.php
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Football outsiders ranks our SOS as #4 in the country based on P5 opponents only with roster weights for opposing talent rating.
This is the most accurate, and we should be higher after playing ole miss, probably back up to #2 in the country.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
2020- 21.4 ppg
2021- 29.1
2022- we're at 31.2 and that's fixing to go up. Despite picking up uga and dropping vandy. Dan only had two seasons over 32, dak's final two years.
We're bad at times, but maybe we're a little hard on leach. He's doing this without a playmaker at qb.
We aren't. He went from 28.5 ppg in 21 to 25.5 ppg this year in conference play. Racking up a bunch of yards on Eastern Tennessee state doesn't prove anything about how this offense operates within the SEC. Yea the schedule is harder. Our talent got a year older as well. Zero improvement and a lot of regression at the quarterback position.
Last edited by Jarius; 11-18-2022 at 02:44 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
WhiskeyPirate
Exactly
Not many teams in the nation are doing any better against top four sec defenses. It’s pretty easy to pick at scabs when you play Georgia , Alabama and LSU on the road. Outside of about five teams, the results wouldn’t be any better.
Unfortunately for Mike Leach, he signed up to coach at a program that plays a lot of really good defenses every single year. This is the SEC West. There are no easy years unless you are OM and get to play Kentucky and Vandy along with 4 creampuffs in the non con. Literally everyone else in the West has a gauntlet.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
I clearly said LEAGUE-ONLY schedule. We have the toughest league only schedule of any sec team and really of any team in college football. Auburn is close, but they drew uga and Mizzou (at home) whereas we got uga and KY (on the road). LSU is the only other team with an argument, and they got TN and Fla.
Last edited by confucius say; 11-18-2022 at 04:58 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
Jarius
We aren't. He went from 28.5 ppg in 21 to 25.5 ppg this year in conference play. Racking up a bunch of yards on Eastern Tennessee state doesn't prove anything about how this offense operates within the SEC. Yea the schedule is harder. Our talent got a year older as well. Zero improvement and a lot of regression at the quarterback position.
Where will our ppg within the sec rank? 6th?
ETA: looks like we will finish at best 6th and at worst 8th. With the hardest league schedule.
Uga, Bama, KY, and LSU are the top 4 defenses and we are the only team to play all 4.
I agree with you Will has not improved. I like him but he is a stop gap guy. We need a playmaker at qb
Last edited by confucius say; 11-18-2022 at 04:53 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
Oh come on, you KNOW that list is a joke. You're really telling me West Virginia is the toughest schedule in the country? They have played 1 team in the top 25. Literally, one top 25 team. You know that's not even comparable to what we've played.
But you still linked to a site that claims 8 of the 10 hardest schedules are in the Big-12 and Pac-12? You know those schedules can't hold a candle to what South Carolina, State, or LSU have played. But you still link that joke of a list because it supports your narrative.
But lets play your game. That site says we've got the 2nd hardest schedule in the SEC after LSU. So yes, the point Confucius made is valid, in that our PPG is partially lower than our SEC peers because we've played a harder schedule than them.
-
Originally Posted by
WhiskeyPirate
Exactly
Not many teams in the nation are doing any better against top four sec defenses. It’s pretty easy to pick at scabs when you play Georgia , Alabama and LSU on the road. Outside of about five teams, the results wouldn’t be any better.
We played GA at home. On the way out, I was talking to some GA fans. One said, y'all carved us up through the air." I said that it was only 200 yards. He said "nobody does that to us". I wish our O would show up for more than 2 or so quarters against all our opponents. Has been our weakness all year. Hail State!
-
Originally Posted by
the_real_MSU_is_us
Oh come on, you KNOW that list is a joke. You're really telling me West Virginia is the toughest schedule in the country? They have played 1 team in the top 25. Literally, one top 25 team. You know that's not even comparable to what we've played.
But you still linked to a site that claims 8 of the 10 hardest schedules are in the Big-12 and Pac-12? You know those schedules can't hold a candle to what South Carolina, State, or LSU have played. But you still link that joke of a list because it supports your narrative.
But lets play your game. That site says we've got the 2nd hardest schedule in the SEC after LSU. So yes, the point Confucius made is valid, in that our PPG is partially lower than our SEC peers because we've played a harder schedule than them.
100% correct
-
Originally Posted by
PikeDawg15
What happened
Crazy how everyone just glosses over that he lost one of the top 5 offensive lineman, that blocked his blind side, to ever come through MSU and a WR that set records in his first year. Will has plenty of flaws but he also is playing behind an offensive line who's made to run block.
-
Originally Posted by
Interpolation_Dawg_EX
Crazy how everyone just glosses over that he lost one of the top 5 offensive lineman, that blocked his blind side, to ever come through MSU and a WR that set records in his first year. Will has plenty of flaws but he also is playing behind an offensive line who's made to run block.
Gurus...can someone explain why our OL is made to run block when we don't run the ball? Players or Coaching?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.