-
Is it too much to ask to get a football class like this?
Obviously for us, yes, yes it's too much to ask. What a dang signing class
-
Yeah for us it's to much to ask lol. For quite awhile now there's been pretty much the same 6-8 teams that had a chance to win the NC and with the new "free agency" in college football it's probably gonna stay about those same teams accept those teams will probably get even deeper, talent wise.
Last edited by Commercecomet24; 05-02-2022 at 02:31 PM.
-
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
Yeah for us it's to much to ask lol. For quite awhile now there's been pretty much the same 6-8 teams that had a chance to win the NC and with the new "free agency" in college football it's probably gonna stay about those same teams accept those teams will probably get even deeper.
By for quite awhile now, if you mean my whole life (born 9-11-1963), then yes it's been that way awhile now. There was always blue bloods and then the rest. I can think of maybe 3 years 1976 Pitt, 1984 with BYU and 1990 with Colorado in my lifetime where top level teams not blue bloods won and Pitt had Tony Dorsett, the best player in the county and Johnny Majors coaching the Veer.
At one time it was worse, at least now there are scholarship limits. Before 1973 your blue bloods had unlimited scholarships. They limited D1 to 105 scholarships in 1973. In 1978 down to 95 and in 1992 down to 85. Some say a further reduction is needed.
Things got somewhat better with scholarship reductions but it never really changed anything. They guys with money always had the best players. It's the way it was and is to this day.
-
Originally Posted by
Hot Rock
By for quite awhile now, if you mean my whole life (born 9-11-1963), then yes it's been that way awhile now. There was always blue bloods and then the rest. I can think of maybe 3 years 1976 Pitt, 1984 with BYU and 1990 with Colorado in my lifetime where top level teams not blue bloods won and Pitt had Tony Dorsett, the best player in the county and Johnny Majors coaching the Veer.
At one time it was worse, at least now there are scholarship limits. Before 1973 your blue bloods had unlimited scholarships. They limited D1 to 105 scholarships in 1973. In 1978 down to 95 and in 1992 down to 85. Some say a further reduction is needed.
Things got somewhat better with scholarship reductions but it never really changed anything. They guys with money always had the best players. It's the way it was and is to this day.
Pretty much, lol. I was born in '65 so I know where you're coming from. I don't think scholarship reductions would do anything at this point with NIL deals going now. As you said the money always wins out.
-
Can't see us getting that much NIL money. And I don't want to know what getting into a bidding war with Bama would look like.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Can't see us getting that much NIL money. And I don't want to know what getting into a bidding war with Bama would look like.
Well, by most accounts, A&M's top-rated class cost them about $28MM or so. Next year's top rated class will certainly be around 30MM
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
Well, by most accounts, A&M's top-rated class cost them about $28MM or so. Next year's top rated class will certainly be around 30MM
True! And I'm guessing that's per year that these players are in college. If my guess is correct that's probably 90 million if all of those players leave after their third year. Which we both know doesn't even happen with Bama. Making it Waaaaaaayyyyyy more than 90 million.
Not to mention paying the classes behind those players too.
-
It?s crazy how much money Texas and Texas A&M have and how bad they both underachieve almost every year. I?ll be curious to see if that strong recruiting class will finally spark them to be up with Bama and UGA over the next several years or if they will remain in the 7-5/8-4/9-3 Auburn, Florida, LSU category.
-
Originally Posted by
PGHBulldogBG
It?s crazy how much money Texas and Texas A&M have and how bad they both underachieve almost every year. I?ll be curious to see if that strong recruiting class will finally spark them to be up with Bama and UGA over the next several years or if they will remain in the 7-5/8-4/9-3 Auburn, Florida, LSU category.
I think a lot of people underestimate just how good Saban is.
You have to have the ability to not only get the players into school. But the coach has to identify and develop those players. That's where Saban is superior to most.
It's two fold. For example Vanderbilt wouldn't be what they are without their endowment. But Corbin does a great job of player identification to get the best.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.