Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 105

Thread: Makai Undrafted

  1. #81
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    2,952
    vCash
    3100

  2. #82

  3. #83
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    I'm just glad we won't be giving 105 touches this year to an undraftable player that can't break a tackle or run away from anyone.

    Polk was a solid player, but I'm optimistic that those 105 touches can be spread around to more explosive players and that should help the offense overall.

    Imagine if we gave an undraftable RB 20 carries a game?
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  4. #84
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,488
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    I'm just glad we won't be giving 105 touches this year to an undraftable player that can't break a tackle or run away from anyone.

    Polk was a solid player, but I'm optimistic that those 105 touches can be spread around to more explosive players and that should help the offense overall.

    Imagine if we gave an undraftable RB 20 carries a game?
    My man coming back with a bad take haha

    I'd gladly take him back

  5. #85
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Both led the sec in receptions.
    Both were undrafted

    Polk this year led the sec in receptions, but was 40th in yds/rec. He's just not a plus athlete
    I'm with you 7. in fact I think I recall one of those "anonymous" NFL scouts commenting that his biggest concern was that Polk's gyrotational flexion lacks fluidity when in phase...
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  6. #86
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    10,072
    vCash
    1003100
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    I'm with you 7. in fact I think I recall one of those "anonymous" NFL scouts commenting that his biggest concern was that Polk's gyrotational flexion lacks fluidity when in phase...
    Cant forget he lacks the twitch flux capacitor in his lower half

  7. #87
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    10,072
    vCash
    1003100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    I'm just glad we won't be giving 105 touches this year to an undraftable player that can't break a tackle or run away from anyone.

    Polk was a solid player, but I'm optimistic that those 105 touches can be spread around to more explosive players and that should help the offense overall.

    Imagine if we gave an undraftable RB 20 carries a game?
    I would take him back and if he could do it again he would come back Id imagine. Somebody tried to make some money off him I hope he doesnt give them a dime of whatever he gets from Baltimore

  8. #88
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,377
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    Cant forget he lacks the twitch flux capacitor in his lower half
    I blew mine out years ago lol

  9. #89
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    Cant forget he lacks the twitch flux capacitor in his lower half
    This^, people, is how you earn rep....
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  10. #90
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    My man coming back with a bad take haha

    I'd gladly take him back
    Please explain how it's a bad take
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  11. #91
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    I would take him back and if he could do it again he would come back Id imagine. Somebody tried to make some money off him I hope he doesnt give them a dime of whatever he gets from Baltimore
    I would for sure take him back. Just saying that those 105 touches going to guys that have a little more burst & physicality to break tackles, could help the offense & help us produce more big plays
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  12. #92
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,488
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Please explain how it's a bad take
    He was the best we had. If there were a better option, he'd have gotten more of those catches

  13. #93
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,338
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    He was the best we had. If there were a better option, he'd have gotten more of those catches
    yeahhhhhhh, people gonna figure that out this Fall
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  14. #94
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Fairhope, AL
    Posts
    4,664
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiskeyPirate View Post
    Lol. The job of his agent is to find teams that need a wide reciever,

    So no he has not signed a. O tract on the weekend of the draft. I?m sure he will though. Lol
    The job of agents is to tell ALL of their clients they will be first rounders so the few who do get drafted will pay for the agent?s new Bugatti.

  15. #95
    Bennie Brown Know-It-All
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,922
    vCash
    3138
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    yeahhhhhhh, people gonna figure that out this Fall
    Don't think I'll lose sleep over wide receiver play in year 3 forward of Mike Leach teams. Much like quarterbacks in his system, someone will produce.

  16. #96
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Madison, MS
    Posts
    977
    vCash
    3187
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    yeahhhhhhh, people gonna figure that out this Fall
    So are you implying we don't have the receiver talent necessary for a Leach offense? If so, that is very worrisome! Am I misunderstanding something here?

  17. #97
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,338
    vCash
    17200
    Dude- this is Year 3 of Leach. We gonna roll.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  18. #98
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    8,658
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    I'm with you 7. in fact I think I recall one of those "anonymous" NFL scouts commenting that his biggest concern was that Polk's gyrotational flexion lacks fluidity when in phase...
    You also have to remember that Polk played in a short passing game O. We don't stretch the field. He is a great possession WR. There are valuable spots in the NFL for those kind of guys. Someone may get lucky with him.

    MSU had a 3rd string WR make an NFL roster under Croom as a possession WR.

  19. #99
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Madison, MS
    Posts
    977
    vCash
    3187
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Dude- this is Year 3 of Leach. We gonna roll.
    Excellent!!


  20. #100
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    12,002
    vCash
    427176943
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Dude- this is Year 3 of Leach. We gonna roll.
    You forgot these*******

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.