Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: So Jim Philips of ACC says no rush to expand playoffs

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    3,707
    vCash
    3000

    So Jim Philips of ACC says no rush to expand playoffs

    Because players don?t like the additional games.

    Greg Sankey responds by saying too many plays in existing games. Need expanded playoffs. Can offset extra games by changing rules to adjust to fewer clock stoppages and fewer plays per game meaning less plays per game would offset more games for the 8 teams that participate past 13 games.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    LiL MissBitch alot sleepy dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    103,010
    vCash
    6115850
    That didn't stop them from going from an 11 game schedule to a 12 a few years back. I'm sure players not in the playoffs would love to play an extra game or 2 to be in the playoffs. I'd love to hear from the players of those teams ranked 5-12 instead of a dude who went to college in the 80s telling us what those players want.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,600
    vCash
    52714
    I predict a change in power in the ACC soon.

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,145
    vCash
    52060
    I predict the ACC falling apart the second the GOR expires (or is rendered null and void). The SEC and Big 10 see a lot of valuable programs in there.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    15,985
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainObvious View Post
    Because players don?t like the additional games.

    Greg Sankey responds by saying too many plays in existing games. Need expanded playoffs. Can offset extra games by changing rules to adjust to fewer clock stoppages and fewer plays per game meaning less plays per game would offset more games for the 8 teams that participate past 13 games.

    Thoughts?
    Sankey's response to more games is not to end the conference title games or eliminate the 1 soft, wasteful game that every team plays....his response is to fundamentally change the college game. I don't like this at all. I like that college has more plays.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,037
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Sankey's response to more games is not to end the conference title games or eliminate the 1 soft, wasteful game that every team plays....his response is to fundamentally change the college game. I don't like this at all. I like that college has more plays.
    Agreed. Because less games means less money. And that's all he's worried about

  7. #7
    Zone Blocking Specialist coachnorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    665
    vCash
    3100
    Something that college football fans have not taken into consideration is the NFL. The NFL will make sure that they dominate the cherished time slots for commercial money. The NFL has expanded its season and playoff format which means incursions into the college football premium advertising slots. If there is an evolution of conflict with the NFL, the Stan Kronkes’ of the world will go to the college football jugular to sustain dominance. Upon its discretion, the NFL has left Saturday time slots open for college football. If college football thinks that the NFL will not change course if there is a college football expansion into NFL slots, college football will get a big beat down?

    In a saturated market, the NFL will crush college football for monetary benefits because they are ruthless businessmen in a ruthless business. Simply, big fish eat little fish. An expanded play-off in college football without the quality play-off product could be very counterproductive from a monetary position.

    If college football players forego post season play to prepare for the draft, a play-off game or bowl game will not sway that decision one way or the other. What happens when the stars forego post season play and post season games become devalued? This will not happen in the NFL but will happen to college football. The quality of the regular season and not the proposed play-off will sustain college football

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    15,985
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowbell View Post
    Agreed. Because less games means less money. And that's all he's worried about
    when you allow people who are only concerned about maximizing profits to make the rules, you get bad rules.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Covington, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,293
    vCash
    700722589
    Who put that ACC ***** in charge of anything.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    3,707
    vCash
    3000
    Phillips noted that he enquired from the Clemson players who had played multiple 14 and/or 15 game seasons and they sited burnout and injury concerns. I guess that is why they decided not to participate in this years playoffs and why the rest of the ACC saw no need to compete for a playoff birth😎

  11. #11
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    The ACC doesn't want expansion because they don't want the SEC poaching their teams.

    With a 12 team playoff, Clemson, North Carolina, etc become much more likely to flip
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    15,985
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    The ACC doesn't want expansion because they don't want the SEC poaching their teams.

    With a 12 team playoff, Clemson, North Carolina, etc become much more likely to flip
    They were in favor of 8 team playoff with automatic qualifiers. That produces a watered down playoff and promotes the non-SEC leagues. SEC would only be able to get 2 teams in which the SEC already does at 4.

    Every conference and everyone involved is only concerned about their agenda. And what's best for themselves. The number 1 priority should be what's best for college football, college football fans and the student athletes.

  13. #13
    Founder of Summer's Eve
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,447
    vCash
    3663
    I?d bet the nfl would like a list of these players who cited burnout, while playing extra championship and championship qualifying games. Real gamer and winner mentality there. I?d probably give both nuts to get an opportunity for a national championship. Holy shit people are soft.

  14. #14
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,145
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by RougeDawg View Post
    I?d bet the nfl would like a list of these players who cited burnout, while playing extra championship and championship qualifying games. Real gamer and winner mentality there. I?d probably give both nuts to get an opportunity for a national championship. Holy shit people are soft.
    Yeah, it almost has to be false. If players are burned out after playing a 15-game season and just can't go to 16 or 17, they probably won't be able to handle the NFL.

  15. #15
    Founder of Summer's Eve
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,447
    vCash
    3663
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    Yeah, it almost has to be false. If players are burned out after playing a 15-game season and just can't go to 16 or 17, they probably won't be able to handle the NFL.
    Burnout at a college age might be a thing if you were playing extra meaningless games, since previously you could not get paid legally. But playing extra games for a chance to do something few others ever get a chance to do shouldn?t cause burning in a winner. Makes zero sense unless they are soft. Might explain why the ACC sucks and is so soft. Maybe they need some little blue pills.

  16. #16
    Zone Blocking Specialist coachnorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    665
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by RougeDawg View Post
    Burnout at a college age might be a thing if you were playing extra meaningless games, since previously you could not get paid legally. But playing extra games for a chance to do something few others ever get a chance to do shouldn?t cause burning in a winner. Makes zero sense unless they are soft. Might explain why the ACC sucks and is so soft. Maybe they need some little blue pills.
    Consider another burnout which is the television viewers. When the football market gets saturated, the NFL will prevail. During the big money advertising slots the viewers will watch live NFL over DVR college football. The networks understand that there is ONLY ad revenue during live viewership thus big money ad slots.

    Viewers watching college football on DVR are worthless for ad money generating; just fast forward past them. College Football needs to generate its money with live viewership. The big money will be generated with more quality games during the regular season in non-competing NFL ad slots.

    Another problem for both NFL and College Football is the decrease of live television viewership across the board. Many are watching streaming services which devalues ad revenues. Streaming services provide family options where one pays monthly and incorporates others on the plan.

    A college football expanded playoff could have games relegated to bad ad time slots due to NFL dominance so why not have more quality games in quality advertising slots during the season? I believe that a pathway to generating more revenue for college football is getting rid of bad non-conference games with great product to generate advertising revenue. College Football will always loose to the NFL.

  17. #17
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    They were in favor of 8 team playoff with automatic qualifiers. That produces a watered down playoff and promotes the non-SEC leagues. SEC would only be able to get 2 teams in which the SEC already does at 4.

    Every conference and everyone involved is only concerned about their agenda. And what's best for themselves. The number 1 priority should be what's best for college football, college football fans and the student athletes.
    How do you get conferences to work in the sport's best interest?
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    15,985
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    How do you get conferences to work in the sport's best interest?
    A commissioner or a board.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Hambone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    NW MS
    Posts
    1,735
    vCash
    105736
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    Yeah, it almost has to be false. If players are burned out after playing a 15-game season and just can't go to 16 or 17, they probably won't be able to handle the NFL.
    How many classes a day does an NFL player have to go to? What other requirements do they have to meet besides playing football?

    I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you, just throwing something out there that I haven’t seen yet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.