-
Originally Posted by
Activated Alpha
Two things. Yes we scored some points today, but we only scored 3 for a looonnnngggg time when we still controlled the game. However, at least, we aren't getting blown out in most games like we did under Croom. If we still had a coach like Croom this game would have been 34-3. Second, if Leech could have his team be competitive and show more improvement further into the year with some more wins I would be content. Especially if he wins against OM.
OM isn?t going to wait for us to have 4 minutes of offensive output. All the time we are 17n around they are going to score 35 pts.
-
The things that stand out to me on both this game and the LATech game are that yes, we ?came back?, but ultimately did so when those teams coaches went ultra conservative to just finish out the game. It bit LATech in the butt- and should have, we are more talented, but it causes me to think that most coaches if up big late will allow us to dink and dunk down field eating up almost as much or more clock than if we ran the ball. Sometimes the tale of the tape is more than the scoreboard.
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
OM isn?t going to wait for us to have 4 minutes of offensive output. All the time we are 17n around they are going to score 35 pts.
I agree and Arnett and his D better bring the A game that night. However I hope Leech will at least put emphasis on this game
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Im just confused on the optimism after scoring 3 points in the first 44 minutes of the game against a pretty average LSU defense that got zero pressure on Will almost all day.
Our first eight drives were :
Fumble
Punt
FG
Interception
Punt
End of half
Missed FG
Punt
LSU switched to a 4 man front as well, I don?t understand why, but it gave us life.
Im happy that we scored some late points, and the kids didnt quit, but our offense the first three quarters is the reason we lost this game.
You just can't see what shotgun does bc shotgun wants to see it. He did this same crap after ever Moorhead debacle
-
It taking fifteen pass play drives to score wil NEVER,NEVER ,EVER work in the SEC. Defenses dropping eight and shutting you down is not making them uncomfortable, lol.
-
I do want to point out that I was sold on this offensive bringing more explosive plays. Only explosion I have had is with diarrhea after watching our offense this year
-
Originally Posted by
bobtail bob
It taking fifteen pass play drives to score wil NEVER,NEVER ,EVER work in the SEC. Defenses dropping eight and shutting you down is not making them uncomfortable, lol.
It did work in the SEC today. The defense giving up big plays on blown coverage lost us the game, not the offense.
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
Agreed. An offense that has to rely on 14 play drives blows. All the other team is has to wait. We 17 it up for them.
14 play drives and controlling the clock is now a bad thing... weird.
-
Originally Posted by
Turfdawg67
14 play drives and controlling the clock is now a bad thing... weird.
They just don't like Leach and will say whatever happens is wrong. If we win next week, it still won't really mean anything.
-
Maybe we should come out against TAM and play like we are down 21-0...
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
You just can't see what shotgun does bc shotgun wants to see it. He did this same crap after ever Moorhead debacle
I don't remember doing this with Moorhead. Maybe early, but this is way different. Remarkable if you can't see the difference and track record of coaches difference
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
Yardage is like having a flashy car but a small dick. Doesn?t mean shit.
Not true when your building a program.
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
It did work in the SEC today. The defense giving up big plays on blown coverage lost us the game, not the offense.
You really think us scoring 3 points in our first E-I-G-H-T drives today was not the reason we lost the game today? I mean, that seems kind of an impossible opinion to have today. Especially when you factor in the play of our OL, which was really good. Will had tons of time to pass, but the problem with the air raid is that you can get a ton of yards between the 20's, but once you get in red zone, you can struggle to score.
I mean eight drives for 3 points, and you don't think that lost us the game? I think your bias for Leach is showing.
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
You really think us scoring 3 points in our first E-I-G-H-T drives today was not the reason we lost the game today? I mean, that seems kind of an impossible opinion to have today. Especially when you factor in the play of our OL, which was really good. Will had tons of time to pass, but the problem with the air raid is that you can get a ton of yards between the 20's, but once you get in red zone, you can struggle to score.
I mean eight drives for 3 points, and you don't think that lost us the game? I think your bias for Leach is showing.
Only looking at the first 8 drives is arbitrary. I look at full games. 486 yards is almost always enough to win an SEC game, and when it's not, it's not the offense's fault.
-
I can't believe some of you dumb mf'ers are even capable of getting up in the morning and getting your teeth brushed to drag your asses out the front door. Mike Leach makes $5,000,000 PER 17ING YEAR! Do some of you not comprehend that simple fact! Holy shit!
-
Originally Posted by
State82
I can't believe some of you dumb mf'ers are even capable of getting up in the morning and getting your teeth brushed to drag your asses out the front door. Mike Leach makes $5,000,000 PER 17ING YEAR! Do some of you not comprehend that simple fact! Holy shit!
We should pay him $1M for every P5 win instead.
-
He might get excited about winning if we did.
-
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
Only looking at the first 8 drives is arbitrary. I look at full games. 486 yards is almost always enough to win an SEC game, and when it's not, it's not the offense's fault.
It?s not cherry picking when your offense simply could not score against an average LSU defense until the 4th quarter when the game was in hand.
Look I?m glad you are happy that we scored 3TDs late in the game, I think it?s fools gold, you think we?ve turned a corner.
I truly hope you are right.
-
I agree with you? looks like pyrite
-
09-25-2021, 08:37 PM
#100
This may be a stupid question, but why does it put question marks in place of other punctuation marks on these posts? It has my ocd on point
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.