-
09-06-2021, 09:10 PM
#141
Originally Posted by
Bothrops
Yeah but why are they worse at every position on the field than La Tech?
Who knows? Time will tell.
-
09-06-2021, 09:10 PM
#142
Originally Posted by
TrapGame
Jesus.
One game for us and we ain't gonna win more than 4 or 5.
Not even finished with one game for OM and they're a 9 win team.
They pass the eye test. They are maybe 3 weeks ahead of our offense at this point. Just by basic gameplay. They are executing. We also didn?t play the 85 bears Saturday.
-
09-06-2021, 09:11 PM
#143
Originally Posted by
BeardoMSU
So you're saying WE'RE ****ed, lol?
Naw the flat passes and bubbles should work pretty good against slow lbs provided we block 😂
-
09-06-2021, 09:12 PM
#144
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
provided we block
-
09-06-2021, 09:17 PM
#145
Look guys, I am just salty.
Ending last season we said, why can?t we block 3 and why can we not move the ball on drop 8. Seems like we still can?t.
-
09-06-2021, 09:18 PM
#146
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
They pass the eye test. They are maybe 3 weeks ahead of our offense at this point. Just by basic gameplay. They are executing. We also didn?t play the 85 bears Saturday.
You need to close one eye cause Louisville sucks. And we played a G5 team that loaded up on 19 transfers, a lot with P5 playing time and a good QB. The film on La Tech from last year was useless. Even Leach said Tech's defense was dropping into coverage they didn't see on film.
-
09-06-2021, 09:23 PM
#147
La Tech will probably end 9-3 and UL 4-8 based on the schedules I?m looking at. How that translate to CUSA vs ACC I don?t know but regardless neither team is a top 50 team
-
09-06-2021, 09:24 PM
#148
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
Look guys, I am just salty.
Ending last season we said, why can?t we block 3 and why can we not move the ball on drop 8. Seems like we still can?t.
We scored 35 points in two quarters. Let's work on the other two.
-
09-06-2021, 09:30 PM
#149
I wish we played a fun offense like this
-
09-06-2021, 09:36 PM
#150
Originally Posted by
msstate7
I wish we played a fun offense like this
A coach refusing to adapt even the slightest to his personnel should've been a red flag for us all.
-
09-06-2021, 09:39 PM
#151
While ole miss defense may be improved I think their offense may have taken a step back. Still will be solid but I am thinking it will be herky jerky.
-
09-06-2021, 09:40 PM
#152
Originally Posted by
msstate7
I wish we played a fun offense like this
Same. Sadly we never will because Ole Miss grabs the majority of the skill positions in the state. Now they are grabbing defense talent that used to go to us. It?s a shame.
-
09-06-2021, 09:43 PM
#153
Originally Posted by
Dawgfan77
Yep La Tech was better on the OL and faster.
Based on??
-
09-06-2021, 09:43 PM
#154
OM's defense may be showing a major weakness, depth. Now granted, I don't know if this is depth or they're in coast mode
-
09-06-2021, 09:47 PM
#155
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Based on??
I dont know if tech is faster than Louisville but I would definitely take the tech qb over the Louisville one
-
09-06-2021, 10:31 PM
#156
Originally Posted by
Bothrops
Yeah but why are they worse at every position on the field than La Tech?
Maybe we should be thankful we didn't hire Satterfield after all.
-
09-06-2021, 10:32 PM
#157
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Based on??
You must not be watching the same game I am. UL is very slow and average. Tech had some skill position players and are much faster and more athletic than this UL team.
-
09-06-2021, 10:32 PM
#158
Originally Posted by
BeardoMSU
A coach refusing to adapt even the slightest to his personnel should've been a red flag for us all.
What personnel did we have that was worth a shit last year? Kylin quit on us, all we had was some freshman receivers and 2 freshman backs. We didn't hardly have shit. Why not go ahead and get your system in place?
The only and I mean ONLY problem I have with us is I wish we could have kept Schrader with these receivers we have now. But I totally agree with Leach and what he has done. He wants to win and is gonna win his way. Why would we not. I mean we already have the best receiver core we have had and maybe EVER had. He has his QBs, but they are just young. They need time.
All these people saying we cant win unless we play smash mouth football or have a mobile QB here at State, when they hell has either of those things worked for us? When have we ever won anything worth a shit running the football.
How did Ole Miss beat Bama when they did? They threw the football. When they were throwing it all over the yard, people on here were complaining cause Mullen wouldn't/couldn't throw it and was running it. Now that we are throwing every down, people wanna complain about that.
Look, we arent gonna win shit and have never won shit lining up and trying to run smash mouth football against Bama or whoever. Were gonna to think outside the box. Now i agree, I wish our QB would run the ball like Minshew did when Leach had him. That would open up a whole new world. I dont know if that is Leach or if that is Rogers being scared.
I do know Rogers had people open down the field damn near every play and either wouldnt pull the trigger and checked down, or got sacked. Alot of his problems is him. When he gets rid of the ball, shit clicks. I think he holds the ball way too long sometimes and misses some opportunity's.
Some of yall need to buckle up. Leach is gonna do it his way no matter what. Yall wanted a coach to actually want to be here and not be looking to get out after every off season and we have it. Let the man do it his way.
Oh and to something else I read earlier today. Cant remember where I saw it on here, but the fella said something to the effect that Leach was gonna have to get over having a few "bad apples" and suck it up. I say bullshit to that. If they wanna be preMadonnas and act like little shits, GTFO. Take your ass to Ole Miss and play. Leach wants guys that will work and bust their ass for him and for the University. Why would we not want that? That may have been the stupidest shit I have ever read on here.
-
09-06-2021, 10:33 PM
#159
Originally Posted by
Dawgology
Same. Sadly we never will because Ole Miss grabs the majority of the skill positions in the state. Now they are grabbing defense talent that used to go to us. It?s a shame.
Like who? Xavian Harris? Who they are going to convert to an offensive lineman but he just doesn't know it yet? Or Jacarius Clayton who has the same story?
-
09-06-2021, 10:33 PM
#160
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Maybe we should be thankful we didn't hire Satterfield after all.
I honestly dont think Satterfield gives one shit about being there anymore. I remember him and the AD having a problem and him saying he would go pretty much anywhere else.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.