Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Average Recruiting Rankings Since 2017

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Central Mississippi
    Posts
    263
    vCash
    39131950

    Average Recruiting Rankings Since 2017

    Since 2017, MSU is tied at 5th in the SEC West for Average Recruiting Rankings. The only team with a worse average finish is Arkansas.

    Average finish of recruiting in the SEC since 2017 -
    Alabama - 1.2
    Arkansas - 10.8
    Auburn - 5
    Florida - 5
    Georgia - 1.8
    Kentucky - 11
    LSU - 3.4
    MSU - 9.8
    Missouri - 12.6
    Ole Piss - 9.8
    South Carolina - 9
    Tennessee - 7.4
    Texas A&M - 4.6
    Vanderbilt - 13.4
    Last edited by dawgman15; 08-16-2021 at 09:46 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member BrunswickDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Home of Slay, GA
    Posts
    12,031
    vCash
    1746501
    Quote Originally Posted by dawgman15 View Post
    Since 2017, MSU is tied at 5th in the SEC West for Average Recruiting Rankings. The only team with a worse average finish is Arkansas.

    Average finish in the SEC since 2017 -
    Alabama - 1.2
    Arkansas - 10.8
    Auburn - 5
    Florida - 5
    Georgia - 1.8
    Kentucky - 11
    LSU - 3.4
    MSU - 9.8
    Missouri - 12.6
    Ole Piss - 9.8
    South Carolina - 9
    Tennessee - 7.4
    Texas A&M - 4.6
    Vanderbilt - 13.4
    The positive - that ties us for 9th overall in the SEC.
    "After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
    - Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,856
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by dawgman15 View Post
    Since 2017, MSU is tied at 5th in the SEC West for Average Recruiting Rankings. The only team with a worse average finish is Arkansas.

    Average finish in the SEC since 2017 -
    Alabama - 1.2
    Georgia - 1.8
    LSU - 3.4
    Texas A&M - 4.6
    Auburn - 5
    Florida - 5
    Tennessee - 7.4
    South Carolina - 9
    MSU - 9.8
    Ole Piss - 9.8
    Arkansas - 10.8
    Kentucky - 11
    Missouri - 12.6
    Vanderbilt - 13.4
    I'm not sure order of finish in the SEC tells us as much as just general rankings. The order of finish in the SEC is mostly going to be pretty consistent over a four year period. Even if we do improve our recruiting, it's not necessarily going to show up in the rankings fully because players are more or less ranked based on who is recruiting them.

    We just have to keep the level of talent close enough that having a few underrated players develop into stars plus using a system to take advantage of the talent we do have can give us a chance to overcome the talent gap every so often.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Central Mississippi
    Posts
    263
    vCash
    39131950
    I should have put average finish of recruiting rankings. That is my bad.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    NE MS
    Posts
    948
    vCash
    389615
    I like to look at team talent as well, it sees who is actually on the roster and not just those that sign but never play there or they transfer out: https://247sports.com/Season/2020-Fo...Conference=SEC

    In the SEC and then overall

    2020 - 9th & 23rd

    2019 - 9th & 23rd

    2018 - 10th & 23rd

    2017 - 10th & 25th

    2016 - 11th - 28th

    2015 - 11th - 28th

    Note: 2021 team calculations are not done yet.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    NE MS
    Posts
    948
    vCash
    389615
    Average team talent is gradually improving. i did not see where this ranking is available before 2014 but here are individual yearly rankings for few previous years

    2014 - 12th & 36th

    2013 - 10th & 24th

    2012 - 9th & 22nd - 1st year of 14 SEC teams

    2011 - 11th & 41st - only 12 teams

    We seem to be more consistently getting in the top 25 in recruiting better than we were a decade ago and light years ahead of the Croom years which gives us better depth.

    Leach & Co seem to be going after the longer and taller players and while we don't have a ton of four star guys, there are a bunch of guys just outside the 4 star ranking that keeps the class looking very nice. They have a few more good targets that should be there before signing day. I like that they seem to have backup plans in place when they miss on a guy. It does make it a bit easier when you can find a transfer guy that starts.

    That last part, transfers, is one of the reasons I watch team talent rather than individual years. What did they get two or three starters this year and the Backup #2 &#3 QB if Abraham gets healthy. That helps fill holes.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,082
    vCash
    3086
    The real issue with this is that in the SEC playing and in the SEC we have to play 5 top 5 teams every year whereas if we were in the ACC with this recruiting ranking we will only have played two so it?s not finishing in the top 25 is just a metric off of who we actually play

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    NE MS
    Posts
    948
    vCash
    389615
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead View Post
    The real issue with this is that in the SEC playing and in the SEC we have to play 5 top 5 teams every year whereas if we were in the ACC with this recruiting ranking we will only have played two so it?s not finishing in the top 25 is just a metric off of who we actually play
    This is absolutely true but getting the talent year in and year out will help with depth and filling holes. Mullen seemed to have years where he would mail in the recruiting with a 36th and 41st ranking.

    State seems to be getting more consistent at recruiting every year. That will help and then winning will help. Let's hope Leach does a little of that this year. That will make it better and could even by signing day. One or tow guys could decide to come here this class.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    4,232
    vCash
    3100
    Mullen finishing 12th in SEC in recruiting the year we made it #1

  10. #10
    2nd Half Playcaller
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    178
    vCash
    3200
    We need to figure out how to start getting around the 15-20 range on a consistent basis.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    NE MS
    Posts
    948
    vCash
    389615
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeshouldveflanked View Post
    Mullen finishing 12th in SEC in recruiting the year we made it #1
    And that is disgustingly bad recruiting. He was headed out the door and it showed. He had every intention of leaving after that year, I don't see Leach doing that. I could be wrong but I think he plans on winning here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.