Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 32 of 32

Thread: Football transfer

  1. #21
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,450
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    Turner can't start for us. He's depth at best. He's similar to the kid this past year from up there. Can run a 40, but that's it. Plus, he'd have to sit. No point.
    No point? We're offering safeties for next year and he's an SEC legit player. You don't go and play at Bama and be a scrub. Saban doesn't get desperate and offer just anyone.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,846
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    Turner can't start for us. He's depth at best. He's similar to the kid this past year from up there. Can run a 40, but that's it. Plus, he'd have to sit. No point.
    I wonder if all the new transfers will make the SEC reconsider imposing extra penalties on transferring in conference. It's going to help other conferences more when players that can't make it at Bama or UGA or LSU leave the conference. I guess Saban won't care; he'd rather the conference slate be easier and if they can't make it at Bama, they're probably not going to help OSU or Clemson beat them. But you'd think there'd be enough SEC schools losing instate recruits and watching them get buried at a blue blood and then not consider them when transferring because of the SEC specific rules would want to change those rules.

  3. #23
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,450
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    I wonder if all the new transfers will make the SEC reconsider imposing extra penalties on transferring in conference. It's going to help other conferences more when players that can't make it at Bama or UGA or LSU leave the conference. I guess Saban won't care; he'd rather the conference slate be easier and if they can't make it at Bama, they're probably not going to help OSU or Clemson beat them. But you'd think there'd be enough SEC schools losing instate recruits and watching them get buried at a blue blood and then not consider them when transferring because of the SEC specific rules would want to change those rules.
    The SEC should definitely throw out its rule. It's hard to understand how it's ruling has power above the NCAA.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,846
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by bulldawg28 View Post
    The SEC should definitely throw out its rule. It's hard to understand how it's ruling has power above the NCAA.
    They can have any conference specific rules they want that don't contradict NCAA rules. NCAA rule just puts minimums for eligibility as far as I know, so conferences can have additional requirements if they want.

  5. #25
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,450
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    They can have any conference specific rules they want that don't contradict NCAA rules. NCAA rule just puts minimums for eligibility as far as I know, so conferences can have additional requirements if they want.
    It still makes no sense.

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    4,673
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by bulldawg28 View Post
    It still makes no sense.
    Yep, in the end you have to choose one or the other. I understand why the rule may be in place but allowing other conferences advantages over SEC transfers seems like the worst of the two.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,846
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by bulldawg28 View Post
    It still makes no sense.
    Not anymore. I think in the past, when transferring was rarer, it helped limit transfers some. If you wanted to leave, you had to sit out a year to go anywhere, so it was a reasonably painful decision, and making an in-SEC transfer sit out two years assured that it was even more painful, as it gave you less options for transferring without dropping down a level or leaving the area (ignoring some of the SEC/ACC overlap). Now when it's so easy and common to transfer, we just ensure we are losing athletes to other conferences.

  8. #28
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,628
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by bulldawg28 View Post
    No point? We're offering safeties for next year and he's an SEC legit player. You don't go and play at Bama and be a scrub. Saban doesn't get desperate and offer just anyone.
    He barely touched the field in their blow outs. He's nothing special. Never was. He ran a great 40 time and nothing else. We've got three good safeties, maybe four if our injured Fr pans out. We've already got several lined up to come in.
    Saban offers guys to keep them from other teams and then processes them.

  9. #29
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,450
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    He barely touched the field in their blow outs. He's nothing special. Never was. He ran a great 40 time and nothing else. We've got three good safeties, maybe four if our injured Fr pans out. We've already got several lined up to come in.
    Saban offers guys to keep them from other teams and then processes them.
    Agreed with Saban.

  10. #30
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,450
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    Not anymore. I think in the past, when transferring was rarer, it helped limit transfers some. If you wanted to leave, you had to sit out a year to go anywhere, so it was a reasonably painful decision, and making an in-SEC transfer sit out two years assured that it was even more painful, as it gave you less options for transferring without dropping down a level or leaving the area (ignoring some of the SEC/ACC overlap). Now when it's so easy and common to transfer, we just ensure we are losing athletes to other conferences.
    Yep, made sense then.

  11. #31
    Senior Member Hambone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    NW MS
    Posts
    1,735
    vCash
    105736
    Turnage is going home to Oxford. Ole Miss bound

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    10,059
    vCash
    1003100
    How does Alabama get the badass LB from Tennessee he would have made our defense one of the best in the league

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.