Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: With an 8-team playoff, there would be no controversy tomorrow

  1. #1
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,074
    vCash
    52060

    With an 8-team playoff, there would be no controversy tomorrow

    There have been legitimate controversies in which teams were selected in 4 of the first 6 years, and it's going to be 5/7 tomorrow regardless of whether they pick Texas A&M or Notre Dame.

    But with an 8-team format that includes an autobid for each P5 league, 1 reserved for the G5, and 2 at-larges, you don't get these controversies every year. Most of the bids are decided on the field, and even the at-larges tend to be pretty obvious. Would there still be some teams upset about getting left out? Sure, but who's going to be crying this year for Indiana, Georgia, USC, etc.? No one.

    Notre Dame and Texas A&M are the clear at-large picks, and while some people might want Coastal Carolina in over Cincinnati for the G5, it's not going to be a particularly heated debate.

    1. Alabama (SEC)
    2. Clemson (ACC)
    3. Ohio State (Big 10)
    4. Texas A&M
    5. Notre Dame
    6. Oklahoma (Big 12)
    7. Cincinnati (G5)
    8. Oregon (Pac-12) [or USC/Colorado if the rule just requires representation, not necessarily the winner of the conference championship game]


    This would be fun, increase the watchability of the regular season, decrease controversy, and the odds of a deserving and plausible playoff winner getting left out are basically nil. Not to mention this would bring in lots of money and end the boring "same teams every year" situation college football has gotten itself into.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,805
    vCash
    3100
    I don't know how many teams there are in the FBS, but if there are 120, and the playoff takes 119, there would be controversy.

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,074
    vCash
    52060
    Here's the playoff picture with this format for 2014 - 2019. There's very little controversy. Only once does a 3-loss team get in (because the Pac-12 is just a lame conference and in 2018 10-3 Washington was their best team), and usually 2-loss non-champions don't make it either, with only 2016 Michigan and 2014 us getting in without a loss coming in the CCG. Even better, not a single 1-loss P5 team doesn't make it (though that ends this year thanks to USC and Indiana playing only half-schedules).

    Is it a perfect system? No, but the 8-team format is a lot less controversial. No one outside the fanbases of the "out" teams is going to complain much about any of these years, and none of the "out" teams has a strong case to get in, like teams routinely do in the 4-team format.

    Last edited by Quaoarsking; 12-20-2020 at 01:11 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    18,677
    vCash
    53100
    Good stuff, man.

    How about the 6 team format, with the top 2 seeds getting byes? How does that compare in your mind, re: controversy?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,816
    vCash
    3200
    Traditionalists that aren't a fan of the top teams not wanting to expand the playoffs is bizarre. It won't devalue the regular season for us and 110 other FBS schools. Our seasons are literally valueless from the start. It should be 16 and they should have at least 2 spots for group of 5. It would be insanely popular and fun to watch.

  6. #6
    Senior Member BrunswickDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Home of Slay, GA
    Posts
    11,916
    vCash
    1746501
    I wish they had kept the BCS formula and added playoffs to it instead of this stupid panel to select the teams. If they move to an 8 or 10 team playoff they should bring back the FCS formula.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    3,795
    vCash
    3100
    I'm a fan of the 8 team playoff. The ONLY arguments against it are 1) "there will still be controversy" (as if the #9 team really has an argument like the #5 team does) and 2) "it devalues the regular season".

    But here's the thing, sure it devalues Bama or Clemsons regular season because they can be less than perfect and still make an 8 team playoff, BUT for every 1 of them there's 2-3 teams for whom it makes the regular season matter more. A&M's season should matter. The Big 12 and PAC's seasons would matter. Losing to Bama isn't necessarily the end of your season- go 11-1 and you're in even if Bama is 12-0. It would devalue some games, but make many more matter.

    If the #6-7-8 teams get curbstomped by the #3-2-1 seeds, that will help expose the lack of parity even among the best of the best and will hasten change. If the #6-7-8 teams can get an upset, how much fun is that?

  8. #8
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,651
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardoMSU View Post
    Good stuff, man.

    How about the 6 team format, with the top 2 seeds getting byes? How does that compare in your mind, re: controversy?
    6 teams would either eliminate the auto champion bids or eliminate at large bids. It needs to be at least 8 teams.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,081
    vCash
    2610
    I don't care how many teams you put in. You could put in 100 and the same 3-4 will be there in the end. It's boring.
    Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.

  10. #10
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    18,677
    vCash
    53100
    Quote Originally Posted by Leroy Jenkins View Post
    I don't care how many teams you put in. You could put in 100 and the same 3-4 will be there in the end. It's boring.
    Not necessarily. At least there would be ample opportunity for upsets. For example, ND would get boat raced by a lot of good teams in an 8 spot playoff.

  11. #11
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,074
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by Leroy Jenkins View Post
    I don't care how many teams you put in. You could put in 100 and the same 3-4 will be there in the end. It's boring.
    Everyone said that about the BCS, and in the first year Ohio State beat #1 and #2 to prove the argument wrong. Then 2 years later, Alabama did it again.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    226
    vCash
    3100
    Teams that don?t make the conference championship game shouldn?t be in the mix. Just my opinion only.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    513
    vCash
    3100
    16 game playoff minimum. More fun football. Less BS.


    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    There have been legitimate controversies in which teams were selected in 4 of the first 6 years, and it's going to be 5/7 tomorrow regardless of whether they pick Texas A&M or Notre Dame.

    But with an 8-team format that includes an autobid for each P5 league, 1 reserved for the G5, and 2 at-larges, you don't get these controversies every year. Most of the bids are decided on the field, and even the at-larges tend to be pretty obvious. Would there still be some teams upset about getting left out? Sure, but who's going to be crying this year for Indiana, Georgia, USC, etc.? No one.

    Notre Dame and Texas A&M are the clear at-large picks, and while some people might want Coastal Carolina in over Cincinnati for the G5, it's not going to be a particularly heated debate.

    1. Alabama (SEC)
    2. Clemson (ACC)
    3. Ohio State (Big 10)
    4. Texas A&M
    5. Notre Dame
    6. Oklahoma (Big 12)
    7. Cincinnati (G5)
    8. Oregon (Pac-12) [or USC/Colorado if the rule just requires representation, not necessarily the winner of the conference championship game]


    This would be fun, increase the watchability of the regular season, decrease controversy, and the odds of a deserving and plausible playoff winner getting left out are basically nil. Not to mention this would bring in lots of money and end the boring "same teams every year" situation college football has gotten itself into.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Lord McBuckethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    12,980
    vCash
    3086
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgsfanalongtime77 View Post
    Teams that don?t make the conference championship game shouldn?t be in the mix. Just my opinion only.
    Absolutely.
    Downvotes_Hype

  15. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,074
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgsfanalongtime77 View Post
    Teams that don?t make the conference championship game shouldn?t be in the mix. Just my opinion only.
    What if you really were the 2nd best team in your conference (like Texas A&M) but didn't get to play in the conference title game because of geography? The Big 12 and ACC match up their top 2 teams, the SEC often doesn't.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    40
    vCash
    3100
    An argument could be made that with a 2 team playoff there wouldn't be any controversy. Conventional wisdom says that Bama and Clemson are locks, we shall see.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.