Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Good news

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    10,024
    vCash
    1003100

    Good news

    We will not be as short handed as we thought

  2. #2
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    10,784
    vCash
    966500
    I know Heath is likely back.

    Are you hearing Davis or Wheat are back as well? Davis was in Memphis yesterday, so I doubt he's back.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,209
    vCash
    3700
    I know Heath is back. Please tell me Wheat and Jordan are back too.

  4. #4
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    10,784
    vCash
    966500
    Even if we could just get one out of Davis and Wheat back, that'd be big. Watson is a good LB, but he was pretty ineffective from the edge spot last week. Having one of those two back would bump him back to a depth guy, which is what we need.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    558
    vCash
    3100
    Out of those 3, health is the least valuable. Were there any others out for covid?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    2,577
    vCash
    3100
    Heath was looking pretty good the last few weeks. I’ll be glad to have him back.

  7. #7
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by ZedFedder View Post
    Heath was looking pretty good the last few weeks. I’ll be glad to have him back.
    Heath, Walley, & Tulu on the field at the same time could be lethal
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  8. #8

  9. #9

  10. #10
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    19,160
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by ZedFedder View Post
    Heath was looking pretty good the last few weeks. I’ll be glad to have him back.
    Yes, would be glad to have him back but scoring on OM will not be the problem. Stopping OM from scoring will be the problem.

  11. #11
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by maroonmania View Post
    Yes, would be glad to have him back but scoring on OM will not be the problem. Stopping OM from scoring will be the problem.
    If our offense clicks, I think we'll find enough defense
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    80
    vCash
    3100
    Having Heath back helps for sure. Especially on those screens that we throw to Mitchell. Heath can take it and get more yards consistently plus a bigger threat to score from it.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    11,936
    vCash
    427176943
    Getting Wheat back will be huge/

  14. #14
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by parabrave View Post
    Getting Wheat back will be huge/
    I don't see how we get Wheat back
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,546
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Heath, Walley, & Tulu on the field at the same time could be lethal
    Heath and Tulu both play X, so they won't be on the field at the same time. With that said, Heath is a big step up from Gardner, so it will be nice to have him back. And I think this is the game Tulu gets free on one of those tunnel screens or X cross.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,643
    vCash
    2238605444
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Looks like we're playing tomorrow
    I guarantee if Ole Miss was in our situation they would postpone it.

  17. #17
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Lambert View Post
    I guarantee if Ole Miss was in our situation they would postpone it.
    100% they would
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    4,181
    vCash
    3100
    We have 5 more players than we had last week...

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,252
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeshouldveflanked View Post
    We have 5 more players than we had last week...
    We had 49 eiligible players to take scholarship wise and took 43.. so if they are the right 5 it matters. If it's a back up oL it doesn't mean jack. With that said we should play.

  20. #20
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    10,784
    vCash
    966500
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    We had 49 eiligible players to take scholarship wise and took 43.. so if they are the right 5 it matters. If it's a back up oL it doesn't mean jack. With that said we should play.
    I think 3 are Heath, Costello, and Cumbest. Heath is a plus, but the other two are in the "doesn't mean jack" category. I really hope we can get some more bodies on defense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.