Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 70 of 70

Thread: So MSU Can Play @ UGA Tomorrow with 54 Players But CFB Needs 85 Man Rosters?

  1. #61
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    19,292
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Agree. Was just making a point that anything is better than the current system
    Shotgun, I TOTALLY support your opinion. College football right now, as a whole is a terrible product. By far the worst of any major sport out there. Yes, there are a lot of great individual games out there from week to week but overall the sport is just not competitive. You've got ONLY the same elite programs every year that can win a championship (roughly 6 to 8 of them) and only maybe about 15-18 programs that have any chance to make a 4 team playoff. The Bama game today was unwatchable, unless you are a huge Bama fan, like all but about 3 or 4 of their games all year. Whatever movement can be formed to promote the reduction of scholarships per program I will gladly join and support. There has to be some way to spread out some of the elite talent a little more each year to close the talent gap a bit between the few haves and the rest of everyone else who are essentially the have nots.

  2. #62
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    SMH

    What the hell are we doing? This is a real sport in 2020. Can you believe it?

    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  3. #63

  4. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Madison, Alabama
    Posts
    15,708
    vCash
    1886332
    Quote Originally Posted by R2Dawg View Post
    Yeah it is a joke. NFL can play with 53 but college needs 85? Something needs to be done just like when they put scholarship limits. Cut them back and bring some parity to college football.
    When scholarship limits were first imposed, was 85 the limit, or has it changed, either up or down, since then?

    Basketball has a limit of 13, which is 2.6 the number that can be on the floor at one time. Baseball can barely field a 9-man team with scholarship players (were they able to give full scholarships). But football has almost 8 times the number on the field at once, or 4 times the number if you consider offense and defense to be different teams (so to speak).

    If the number was cut to that of basketball, then the limitation would be 2.6 x 22, or 57.2. Maybe that's the magic number for football. It's a contact sport, but so is basketball nowadays.

  5. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    3,844
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by RocketDawg View Post
    When scholarship limits were first imposed, was 85 the limit, or has it changed, either up or down, since then?

    Basketball has a limit of 13, which is 2.6 the number that can be on the floor at one time. Baseball can barely field a 9-man team with scholarship players (were they able to give full scholarships). But football has almost 8 times the number on the field at once, or 4 times the number if you consider offense and defense to be different teams (so to speak).

    If the number was cut to that of basketball, then the limitation would be 2.6 x 22, or 57.2. Maybe that's the magic number for football. It's a contact sport, but so is basketball nowadays.
    I think you are on to something here.

    But let?s round up to 3x
    Basketball 3x 5=15 scholarships
    Baseball 3x 9=27 scholarships
    Football 3x 22=66 scholarships
    W-Basketball-15
    Softball-27
    Soccer-33
    Volleyball-12
    Cheerleading/Dance-21

  6. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    664
    vCash
    3200
    The money is in football.

    I imagine, the scholarships won't change due to it helping so many under-privileged kids get a degree. Whether you agree with that or not.

  7. #67
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by SPMT View Post
    The money is in football.

    I imagine, the scholarships won't change due to it helping so many under-privileged kids get a degree. Whether you agree with that or not.
    That is the political side of this. However, the sport would make more money with less scholarships which may open the door for players to be paid something
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  8. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    664
    vCash
    3200
    True

  9. #69
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    19,292
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by SPMT View Post
    The money is in football.

    I imagine, the scholarships won't change due to it helping so many under-privileged kids get a degree. Whether you agree with that or not.
    There would be a lot more money in football if more schools could actually compete for something other than a nice bowl trip. Can you imagine how many more season tickets could be sold at a lot of the Power 5 schools if more schools had real hopes of competing for a NC. The money will be there anyway, no matter how many scholarships football gets, and most folks just want a more competitive product to follow so seems like it would be fine to just fund 10 to 15 more scholarships from the football profits to fund scholarships for underprivileged kids. It would be the same difference since we are basically saying that the extra glut of scholarships used on football is just a scholarship program anyway.

  10. #70
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by maroonmania View Post
    There would be a lot more money in football if more schools could actually compete for something other than a nice bowl trip. Can you imagine how many more season tickets could be sold at a lot of the Power 5 schools if more schools had real hopes of competing for a NC. The money will be there anyway, no matter how many scholarships football gets, and most folks just want a more competitive product to follow so seems like it would be fine to just fund 10 to 15 more scholarships from the football profits to fund scholarships for underprivileged kids. It would be the same difference since we are basically saying that the extra glut of scholarships used on football is just a scholarship program anyway.
    Dead... nuts... on
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.