Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 50

Thread: Only ways this works

  1. #21
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,333
    vCash
    3100
    7 empty red zone trips, 10 turnovers(yikes), 3 pick 6's all in the last 2 games and thats the reason we're 1-2 instead of 3-0. You almost have to try to be that bad on offense, geez that's a super horrid stretch.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,880
    vCash
    3100
    12 turnovers if you're counting turnovers on downs

  3. #23
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    10,874
    vCash
    966500
    We're somewhat moving the ball, but we keep stalling once we get into opponent territory and the zone becomes more tight.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    5,093
    vCash
    3828
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    1. You absolutely can if you had to. The two TD drives vs ark were 15 plays, 75 yards and 14 plays, 76 yards.
    2. You won't have to. Once you prove you're willing to do it and score every possession, those 12-15 yard passes will be open. Nobody is saying it is the long term goal of the offense, but it is a solution to the drop 8.
    I absolutely agree. You do it enough with consistency and you wont see drop 8. You give me 5 yards every play and I will be you like a drum. Nobody here would be mad if we handed the ball off 20 times in a row and got 5 yards each carry. I think the running backs have to be first read some and hit them in stride with a full head of steam going up field instead of the outlet where they turn there back to the defense to receive the ball. It's essentially a sweep/running play anyway. Do that enough and other things open up. And just don't give the dang thing away.

  5. #25
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,621
    vCash
    52714
    SEC defenses will take their chances on those 5 yard passes. Wait on a mistake. WR going to have to find the holes. Got to run it. Bucky can break it down better than me. Motion is our friend too. I watch an air raid team last week motion there back out and let the receivers block and clear on quick passes. Got 10 yards a pop. That opened up a deep pass for a 70 yard TD. I'm most worried about the OL. Can't get much without it. Back can't help with protection. Can't run it.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    8,655
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    1) OL must block better. WAY better

    2) QB can't throw picks

    3) Must run the ball some to punish them for dropping 8. (#1 applies to this as well)

    4) Must be able to throw deeper routes, which again points to #1. Better blocking of a 3 man rush leads to having tons of time for the zone to get spread and guys to become more open in deeper areas.

    So better blocking (#1) and eliminate the picks (#2)? Sounds simple but we haven't been close the last few weeks on these two key objectives.

    Am I way off?
    For the most part, I agree. I don't think we need that many deep routes to be successful but we do need some 15 yard type success which I think we can do. We have talent in all areas, just need to clean up our execution.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    8,655
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    7 empty red zone trips, 10 turnovers(yikes), 3 pick 6's all in the last 2 games and thats the reason we're 1-2 instead of 3-0. You almost have to try to be that bad on offense, geez that's a super horrid stretch.
    In reality it is 4 pick 6. One was an 85 yard return to the goal line. How many years do most teams go before they have 4 pick 6? We did that in 3 games. If we don't do those passes, we could be 2-1 worst case and maybe still 3-0.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,880
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    SEC defenses will take their chances on those 5 yard passes. Wait on a mistake. WR going to have to find the holes. Got to run it. Bucky can break it down better than me. Motion is our friend too. I watch an air raid team last week motion there back out and let the receivers block and clear on quick passes. Got 10 yards a pop. That opened up a deep pass for a 70 yard TD. I'm most worried about the OL. Can't get much without it. Back can't help with protection. Can't run it.
    Saw that 10 yards a pop too. Loose zone. Swung it to back behind line of scrimmage. Wr blocking zone defenders Easy pick up if your wr block.

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    8,655
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    SEC defenses will take their chances on those 5 yard passes. Wait on a mistake. WR going to have to find the holes. Got to run it. Bucky can break it down better than me. Motion is our friend too. I watch an air raid team last week motion there back out and let the receivers block and clear on quick passes. Got 10 yards a pop. That opened up a deep pass for a 70 yard TD. I'm most worried about the OL. Can't get much without it. Back can't help with protection. Can't run it.
    OL is a challenge. I don't like the wide splits. Putting OL on an island with the best/fastest DL in the nation every week. Most teams OL would have issues with those gaps. Imagine lining up against Sweat a few years ago? Nasty. Half teams in SEC have that.

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    4,864
    vCash
    3200
    I went back and watched the Kentucky game and the one thing that stood out even more than normal was the lack of playmakers at the WR position. Very little separation, very little YAC, almost always losing 50/50 balls. It was depressing.

    I'm not sure how that gets fixed except through recruiting.

    The OL problems that people have touched on, but I think the bigger issue is that for years we recruited big OL that can run block first and pass block when needed. Now it is pass block 80% of the game. I'm not sure we have recruited the right type of OL for this offense. Dollar Bill is meant to be a road grader, not a pass blocking OT. I swear this reminds me of the 2012 OL where we had solid talent, but the guys weren't built to pass block for a immobile QB.

    I understand we hired Leach to do it all, but I think the LSU game made us all forget that we are switching from a run first offense to a pass first offense and those transitions can be ugly - just ask Arkansas when they went from Ground and Pound to Chad Morris spread. I really think this year will be a struggle because of personnel issues and Leach will not adjust his offense to fit his talent. Mullen to his credit in his first season by the end of the year figured out some stuff that worked and kicked the shit out of the bears with Relf and Dixon. I hope Leach finds something that works and can rally the troops.

  11. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    8,655
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by KOdawg1 View Post
    We're somewhat moving the ball, but we keep stalling once we get into opponent territory and the zone becomes more tight.
    Good point, this worries me. We scored outside red zone most of time at LSU. The redzone pushes their drop 8 up and then we can't run or throw short passes. We saw that at UK. Lots of challenges in front of us for this O to work.

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    8,655
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by HancockCountyDog View Post
    I went back and watched the Kentucky game and the one thing that stood out even more than normal was the lack of playmakers at the WR position. Very little separation, very little YAC, almost always losing 50/50 balls. It was depressing.

    I'm not sure how that gets fixed except through recruiting.

    The OL problems that people have touched on, but I think the bigger issue is that for years we recruited big OL that can run block first and pass block when needed. Now it is pass block 80% of the game. I'm not sure we have recruited the right type of OL for this offense. Dollar Bill is meant to be a road grader, not a pass blocking OT. I swear this reminds me of the 2012 OL where we had solid talent, but the guys weren't built to pass block for a immobile QB.

    I understand we hired Leach to do it all, but I think the LSU game made us all forget that we are switching from a run first offense to a pass first offense and those transitions can be ugly - just ask Arkansas when they went from Ground and Pound to Chad Morris spread. I really think this year will be a struggle because of personnel issues and Leach will not adjust his offense to fit his talent. Mullen to his credit in his first season by the end of the year figured out some stuff that worked and kicked the shit out of the bears with Relf and Dixon. I hope Leach finds something that works and can rally the troops.
    LSU game didn't make us forget, it made us think that the switch was done. Talking heads said it, guess the air raid will work in SEC. Who wouldn't think that setting an SEC record?

  13. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    677
    vCash
    3100
    The biggest problem in the KY and Ark games were that we let them get ahead early.

    This offense will work, but you have to be patient in the beginning. If we are able to just dink and dunk patiently and get a score or two early, no coach is going to let their D stay in a drop 8 even if it's their best chance to win.

    WE HAVE TO BE PATIENT EARLY AND NOT FORCE THINGS. Now the problem is KJ is not seeing things well. The screen pass that was picked off was a terrible decision. The receiver was getting tackled as the ball left KJ's hand.

    Once KY got up by a couple of scores they weren't going to get out of the drop 8 even if they gave up a score.

    In summary and I'll add a couple points,

    -Be patient early but it's crucial that we score first
    -no turnovers trying to force passes
    -receivers when they catch the ball have to get the yards they can. They can't dance or try to juke. Guaranteed 4-5 yards is better than 1-2 yards with big play potential

  14. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    4,864
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by R2Dawg View Post
    LSU game didn't make us forget, it made us think that the switch was done. Talking heads said it, guess the air raid will work in SEC. Who wouldn't think that setting an SEC record?
    I agree, such fools gold. Also such a good reminder how important coaching is. I don't believe that LSU is less talented than Arkansas and Kentucky defensively. They simply refused to adjust to the air raid and got boat raced by Leach. Its possible more coaches may still be stubborn and not switch to the Husky 3-8 defense, but I think it would be coaching malpractice at this point if you didn't switch to the 3-8.

    What needs to happen is Leach needs to adjust to the 3-8 defense being played by SEC level athletes. DL in a 3-8 can put pressure on the QB. The back 8 on an SEC defense can create turnovers and make tackles. I was watching the Wazzu/Oregon 2018 game and the Oregon tackling was atrocious. So many 3 yard plays turned into 8-12 yard plays. That is not happening for us. It needs to.

  15. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    677
    vCash
    3100
    To add to my above post, I don't understand our receivers and backs dancing when they get the ball. The big play isn't going to happen against drop 8 when you catch it 3yards past the LOS. Even if you get someone to miss you may only pick up 2 more yards(yards that you could have gotten if you just ran straight ahead anyway.)

    To me this is almost as big a problem as the Oline. The dancing only gives us 2 yards a catch instead of 4 which puts us behind the sticks for the dunk and dunk to work.

  16. #36
    Senior Member Maroonthirteen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    6,008
    vCash
    4388
    Once in the red zone, those 8 defenders don't have as much area to cover. And we don't run. Lots of INT opportunity.

    2018: WashSt was #1 in PAC with red zone td %. (Minshew)

    2019: WashSt was #7 in PAC at 59% red zone TD. (No Minshew)

  17. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    5,093
    vCash
    3828
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    SEC defenses will take their chances on those 5 yard passes. Wait on a mistake. WR going to have to find the holes. Got to run it. Bucky can break it down better than me. Motion is our friend too. I watch an air raid team last week motion there back out and let the receivers block and clear on quick passes. Got 10 yards a pop. That opened up a deep pass for a 70 yard TD. I'm most worried about the OL. Can't get much without it. Back can't help with protection. Can't run it.
    You definitely have to be consistent and patient to 5 yard them to death. I was just saying it could be done(we aren't doing it) to get teams out of the 3-8 in order to take shots. And you and I have both said to hit the back out of the back field much quicker (screens, swing pass, etc.) so they are not having to slow down or put there back to the defense. Losing a lot of yac with the way we are doing it. The back can't be the safety valve every play. Got to be design to him first some, especially against 3-8. But I guess all that means squat if you OL is like a screen door and the DL is like a breeze.

  18. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,015
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    If we just don't turn the ball over at an alarming rate (12 the last two games, yea I'm counting the 2 turnovers on downs vs ark), we are 3-0. It's not that complicated.

    There is nothing wrong with taking 5 yards every play, which is there. That's the primary counter to the drop 8, even if you can't run the ball. Sit down 5 yards past the center. It has been there every time, literally. We've just killed ourselves with turnovers and penalties and not taking the 5 yards every play.
    5 yards is 5 yards run or pass. Who would not run every time if you could get 5 yards.

    5 yards.

  19. #39
    Senior Member messageboardsuperhero's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,209
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    1) OL must block better. WAY better

    2) QB can't throw picks

    3) Must run the ball some to punish them for dropping 8. (#1 applies to this as well)

    4) Must be able to throw deeper routes, which again points to #1. Better blocking of a 3 man rush leads to having tons of time for the zone to get spread and guys to become more open in deeper areas.

    So better blocking (#1) and eliminate the picks (#2)? Sounds simple but we haven't been close the last few weeks on these two key objectives.

    Am I way off?
    Do 1-3 and number 4 takes care of itself. Really do 1-2 and 3-4 will take care of themselves.

    1 and 2 are the real problems, along with WRs not blocking on the edge or running precise/correct routes. 3 and 4 are symptoms of those problems.

  20. #40
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,621
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by Percho View Post
    5 yards is 5 yards run or pass. Who would not run every time if you could get 5 yards.

    5 yards.
    Not many would. Because eventually that gets taken away. The difference is the ball is in the air when you throw it. Chance for mistakes is larger. But nobody wants to watch 5 yards every pass play either. That's some boring ass football.
    Last edited by Cooterpoot; 10-14-2020 at 07:27 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.