Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 67

Thread: Shrader Playing Some WR

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Covington, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,295
    vCash
    700722589
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Maybe, but he 6’5” 230. Not sure how crisp your route running has to be at that size. The quality of his hands will decide way more than his route running IMO
    Look at it this way how many balls does a QB field in the shotgun

  2. #22
    Senior Member NWADAWG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    429
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    How many TEs have the agility to get open against SEC DBs? He seems as agile or more agile than most tightends. Granted he's not going to be getting in a three point stance, but he's also probably not going to be lined up on the outside going against a CB. If he plays, he'll be facing a lot of coverage from Safeties or maybe even outside linebackers if we're lucky. If we're facing zone, then it will be as much or more about his ability to find space.
    Scheme, formation, and play calling will help a lot with getting open too. From what I've seen, getting open in Leach's offense is way easier than anything we've seen at State before.

    Leach seems to accomplish what JoMo talked about. He attacks the defense and makes the secondary make choices about who to cover. No matter what the choice, someone is open at some point. (We still are required to actually throw the ball to the open receiver and catch the ball). Leach has scored a lot of points with some receivers that were mediocre at best.

    The only way I see to keep that from happening is to play tight man on every receiver. Hill is really hoping someone dumb enough to try that.

  3. #23
    Senior Member LC Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    5,742
    vCash
    4938
    If our 3rd string quarterback becomes a big part of our offense by swapping to receiver a little less than 3 weeks from our first game I'd say we have major problems at receiver. Can't blame Schrader for trying and maybe he can be part of a special package or two.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,701
    vCash
    4062
    Don't make it complicated. He's a strong guy with a big frame. Make him a redzone specialist and have him get good at jump balls and blocking. He's not going to be a pure route runner so there's no reason to expect him to be. Let him be an athletic where vertical space is limited and getting higher than a shorter corner is valued.

  5. #25
    Senior Member msbulldog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    W. Monroe, LA
    Posts
    7,429
    vCash
    1089576
    Quote Originally Posted by HailStateSZN19 View Post
    Great on Shrader for being willing to give it a shot. Hurts nothing to give it a try.

    But I'll be shocked if he makes an impact this season at WR or at WR ever really. He's a great athlete at QB but being a great athlete at WR in the SEC is a whole different thing. The fluidity and agility side to side to run routes to get open as a WR in the SEC is totally different from scrambling from DL and LB. Again, he's a hell of an athlete playing QB but throw him with the athletes at WR and his agility/quickness isn't what it was at QB. Just my opinion. I hope he crushes it and can get on the field though. He's a true team player being willing to do this.

    Also, let the Will Rogers hype train continue building.....gonna be a DUDE.
    I don't know man, he's got that helicopter move down pat.
    Praise The Lord and Go Dawgs!!!

  6. #26
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,601
    vCash
    52714
    He's faster and quicker than our TEs lining up at WR. No idea if he can run routes and catch balls. Hope he can. Hate to see him leave.

  7. #27
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Quote Originally Posted by ckDOG View Post
    Don't make it complicated. He's a strong guy with a big frame. Make him a redzone specialist and have him get good at jump balls and blocking. He's not going to be a pure route runner so there's no reason to expect him to be. Let him be an athletic where vertical space is limited and getting higher than a shorter corner is valued.
    Osirus, Shavers, Heath, & Austin can all do that & are actual WR's.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    916
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    Osirus, Shavers, Heath, & Austin can all do that & are actual WR's.
    What's the latest on Shavers and Heath? How they been looking in camp? Got high hopes for both being big contributors this year and then exploding next season.
    #SwingUrSword #HailDamnState

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,845
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by LC Dawg View Post
    If our 3rd string quarterback becomes a big part of our offense by swapping to receiver a little less than 3 weeks from our first game I'd say we have major problems at receiver. Can't blame Schrader for trying and maybe he can be part of a special package or two.
    I mean, it's almost certainly our weakest position group on offense by a significant margin.

    But also, WR is probably the easiest position to just come into and rely on athleticism. Aren't going to get the QB killed by poor blocking like a RB can, and the routes are generally going to be easier to learn than defensive assignments, and while there will be the occasional pick six caused by a WR and QB not being on the same page, WRs don't generally risk a TD everytime they screw up like a LB or DB might.

    Ryan Tannehill was a QB that switched to WR after fall of his RS freshman year at A&M and was really good pretty much immediately. I think Bear Wilson was a pretty big contributor as a true freshman after not playing a whole lot of football up to that point. And at least a few college qbs have turn into pretty good NFL WRs (Matt Jones, Antwan Randle El (sp?). I'm sure there are a ton of HS QBs that have been moved to receiver or evern recruited at receiver and done really well. Not saying I expect Shrader to be great at WR, but it seems like there's a decent chance he could help us there based on his play last year, if he can catch.

  10. #30
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,173
    vCash
    4975
    Quote Originally Posted by LC Dawg View Post
    If our 3rd string quarterback becomes a big part of our offense by swapping to receiver a little less than 3 weeks from our first game I'd say we have major problems at receiver. Can't blame Schrader for trying and maybe he can be part of a special package or two.
    Dude is a baller and wants to play. The only way he sees the field is to become a WR. It's that simple.

  11. #31
    Senior Member Bubb Rubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,195
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Just goes to show you how appealing the WR position is in Leach?s offense.

    Shrader probably looks at it and says ?If I made the two deep at WR at some point, I would catch 50 balls and have a chance at the NFL?
    Or maybe he's just thinking, "I'll bide my time this year and get on the field any way I can, and then I'll transfer to Florida and play for the SEC championship in a couple of years."

  12. #32
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    6,365
    vCash
    98074
    If this move is permanent and the staff has decided to roll with Rogers then if I'm Garrett I'm doing whatever I can to get on the field this year in any way I can and then I can transfer. He doesn't lose a year and still has his RS year. So he could literally be a 4th year RS Freshman for a new team with SEC QB experience. There's not many teams in the country who wouldn't be lining up trying to bring him in. I know of a certain Florida coach that would kill it with Shrader.

  13. #33
    Senior Member BiscuitEater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,545
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    Yep he's not the QB for now or the future so it doesn't hurt to try it out.
    Not so fast. Kid is a competitor. Hope he sticks around and competes for the QB job next year and backup qb this year. It never hurts to have good backups, especially at QB.
    Coach34 .. "We're not hiring the ****ing Pirate at Miss State. GTFO"


  14. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,701
    vCash
    4062
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    Osirus, Shavers, Heath, & Austin can all do that & are actual WR's.
    Point? Would you prefer Shrader carry a clipboard all year?

  15. #35
    Senior Member Thick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,502
    vCash
    4639
    It?s funny to me that he?s at WR. Him being at WR is like Nolte in North Dallas Forty. I say that, bc my daughter says every time she sees him he?s having a smoke and is drunk or is heading in that direction. Before any of you snowflakes get your panties in a wad, I?m not criticizing the kid. It?s just a good comparison minus the pills/shit from NDF.

  16. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,845
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    If this move is permanent and the staff has decided to roll with Rogers then if I'm Garrett I'm doing whatever I can to get on the field this year in any way I can and then I can transfer. He doesn't lose a year and still has his RS year. So he could literally be a 4th year RS Freshman for a new team with SEC QB experience. There's not many teams in the country who wouldn't be lining up trying to bring him in. I know of a certain Florida coach that would kill it with Shrader.
    Fourth year RS So, but still a valid point. If he wants, he could pretty easily have an undergrad and two masters before he runs out of eligibility. Only reason to not play WR this year is if he thinks he'd be better served practicing at QB rather than playing at WR.

  17. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    183
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Thick View Post
    It?s funny to me that he?s at WR. Him being at WR is like Nolte in North Dallas Forty. I say that, bc my daughter says every time she sees him he?s having a smoke and is drunk or is heading in that direction. Before any of you snowflakes get your panties in a wad, I?m not criticizing the kid. It?s just a good comparison minus the pills/shit from NDF.
    Excellent movie. "Hey, you gonna eat them pills?" "Does a shark sh*t in the water?"

  18. #38
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Quote Originally Posted by BiscuitEater View Post
    Not so fast. Kid is a competitor. Hope he sticks around and competes for the QB job next year and backup qb this year. It never hurts to have good backups, especially at QB.
    Those aren't my thoughts they're Leach's.

  19. #39
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Quote Originally Posted by ckDOG View Post
    Point? Would you prefer Shrader carry a clipboard all year?
    If he's not 1 of the best players at a position? Yes

  20. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,015
    vCash
    3200
    I hope he puts a plug in a lot of, "opinions." what ever position he plays.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.