Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Ivy League votes to cancel all fall athletics

  1. #1
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,374
    vCash
    2610

    Ivy League votes to cancel all fall athletics

    The first domino fell today with this vote. The media is trying to say that D1 programs won't necessarily follow the same path, and while I agree with that, I think the pressure will continue.

    In addition, the Big 12 decided to cancel band and cheer from travel to away games. How on earth can you say it's ok for football to go but not for band and cheer? Inequality like that is going to derail this system as it becomes even more clear that college football is trying to money grab.

  2. #2
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    Ivy League schools don't depend on athletics for the local economy to be functional.

    The SEC simply cannot cancel football. It would be an execution to Starkville, Oxford, Auburn, Tuscaloosa, Gainesville, Etc.

    Simply can't happen. The economical destruction would come close to ruining the towns.
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,173
    vCash
    53100
    It's not a money grab, it's a necessity. Big time P5 athletic departments have so much money contractually obligated to go out that even if they laid off everybody they could they would still owe loan payments (How much do we owe on the new Dude?) contracted salaries, buyout payments and so on and so fourth.

    And I don't know about any other states. But here in Alabama the governor has a seat on the board of all state funded universities. The state of Alabama is playing football I assure you.

  4. #4
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,432
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Ivy League schools don't depend on athletics for the local economy to be functional.

    The SEC simply cannot cancel football. It would be an execution to Starkville, Oxford, Auburn, Tuscaloosa, Gainesville, Etc.

    Simply can't happen. The economical destruction would come close to ruining the towns.
    Oh the sec can, and unfortunately, I expect it.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,243
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Ivy League schools don't depend on athletics for the local economy to be functional.

    The SEC simply cannot cancel football. It would be an execution to Starkville, Oxford, Auburn, Tuscaloosa, Gainesville, Etc.

    Simply can't happen. The economical destruction would come close to ruining the towns.
    It would destroy towns all over the US.

  6. #6
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,374
    vCash
    2610
    All of these posts show the real issue here, and that is that college football and entities like ESPN control how colleges function as a whole. And that shouldn't be the case.

    That's bad folks. I'm a massive college football fan. Massive. But I'm also a public school administrator and see this same thing at the high school level. The fact that not having one football season could prevent a number of the biggest universities in the country from functioning is a problem.

    Maybe it's time the system broke down because if we have to have college football for universities to function academically, the system is broken.

  7. #7
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by MetEdDawg View Post
    All of these posts show the real issue here, and that is that college football and entities like ESPN control how colleges function as a whole. And that shouldn't be the case.

    That's bad folks. I'm a massive college football fan. Massive. But I'm also a public school administrator and see this same thing at the high school level. The fact that not having one football season could prevent a number of the biggest universities in the country from functioning is a problem.

    Maybe it's time the system broke down because if we have to have college football for universities to function academically, the system is broken.
    I get your point but how else are universities going to get that much money to build nice facilities?
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  8. #8
    Senior Member Turfdawg67's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    4,872
    vCash
    3100
    Man, if I don't get to see college football this year, and specifically ML & KJC, I will be so bummed. But that would be MSU's luck... highest rated QB ever and never takes a snap.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    9,940
    vCash
    3200
    I'm surprised the Ivy league still plays sports anyway.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,243
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Turfdawg67 View Post
    Man, if I don't get to see college football this year, and specifically ML & KJC, I will be so bummed. But that would be MSU's luck... highest rated QB ever and never takes a snap.
    I was thinking about that this morning. Get a great QB here and we never see him play. You can't make this stuff up.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,243
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    I get your point but how else are universities going to get that much money to build nice facilities?
    It's not just the universities. Hotels, restaurants, bars, etc will go under. These businesses depend on the schools being open and kids being there and sports taking place to survive.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    248
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    It's not just the universities. Hotels, restaurants, bars, etc will go under. These businesses depend on the schools being open and kids being there and sports taking place to survive.
    How would it help college towns to play football this fall? There is no way there would be crowds. It might help the schools and conferences to play and secure television dollars, but not the towns. And even then the schools are still down millions in tickets, concessions, etc.

    My guess would have been that playing all major sports in the spring was the top option for NCAA (and reducing or eliminating non-revenue sports like Stanford just did) as that would possibly enable typical revenue streams. But the NCAA claims to not even be looking into it, or only considering as a last resort. So who knows?

    But hotels, restaurants and bars are not going to be gorging on income streams from college football fans this fall. That is wishful thinking.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,243
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Walkerhill View Post
    How would it help college towns to play football this fall? There is no way there would be crowds. It might help the schools and conferences to play and secure television dollars, but not the towns. And even then the schools are still down millions in tickets, concessions, etc.

    My guess would have been that playing all major sports in the spring was the top option for NCAA (and reducing or eliminating non-revenue sports like Stanford just did) as that would possibly enable typical revenue streams. But the NCAA claims to not even be looking into it, or only considering as a last resort. So who knows?

    But hotels, restaurants and bars are not going to be gorging on income streams from college football fans this fall. That is wishful thinking.
    Maybe not gorging but if the season goes forward there will be a chance for them to survive if it doesn't there's no chance.

  14. #14
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,276
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Bothrops View Post
    I'm surprised the Ivy league still plays sports anyway.
    Interesting Malcolm Gladwell chapter in David & Goliath on this.

    Ivy League schools have athletics mostly so that the worst students in the school have something besides academics to be successful at.

    The Ivy League schools found that the suicide & drop out rate among students at the bottom of the class is significantly less when the bottom of the class is athletes rather than just general students. Thus, by having athletics, they boost many of the academic only people up their class rankings, which seems to create a better experience for everyone.

    Interesting book
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  15. #15
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,374
    vCash
    2610
    Then the system is flawed and everyone grew too fast and lends credence to the fact that we need all the universities we have to offer diverse options for kids.

    ESPN should not run MSU. Period. But they do because tv dollars fund our growth. Sorry but that's the truth. How did universities survive 30 years ago without these billions of dollars of tv contracts? Just because it's done the way it is now doesn't mean it's right. We've build a model that slips up this easily? That means it's a bad model and needs to be broken down.

    The fact that entertainment and television companies determine whether colleges sink or swim should be blatantly obvious as to how bad that is. Maybe folks have never thought about it like that. But now is the time to do that. Mark Keenum should be the President Of Mississippi State University, not James Pitaro, who is the President of ESPN.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,399
    vCash
    3700
    What the Ivy League does as far as football shouldn't have any bearing on what the SEC does.

    The reality of college athletics at least as far as the SEC goes is there is too much emphasis on going pro in sports and not enough emphasis on education and the value of that.

    It seems to me too many people tell these SEC prospects "Oh, you're going to be a star in the NFL. You're one of the best I've ever seen. Fletcher Cox 2.0!" or whatever the comparison is. I wish there was a lot more emphasis on go to college and you will get a chance to showcase your talents for the pros AND you will get a great degree that will set you up for life if things don't work out in the pros.

    Ironically I think the wanting to show the pros what you can do is going to be a reason why we play in the fall. I could see some lawsuits if they don't play and then a guy doesn't get drafted or drafted as high as they think they should and "well, you ruined it".

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    1,009
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by MetEdDawg View Post
    Then the system is flawed and everyone grew too fast and lends credence to the fact that we need all the universities we have to offer diverse options for kids.

    ESPN should not run MSU. Period. But they do because tv dollars fund our growth. Sorry but that's the truth. How did universities survive 30 years ago without these billions of dollars of tv contracts? Just because it's done the way it is now doesn't mean it's right. We've build a model that slips up this easily? That means it's a bad model and needs to be broken down.

    The fact that entertainment and television companies determine whether colleges sink or swim should be blatantly obvious as to how bad that is. Maybe folks have never thought about it like that. But now is the time to do that. Mark Keenum should be the President Of Mississippi State University, not James Pitaro, who is the President of ESPN.
    The system is what it is now and you can?t just make that money appear out of thin air. The fact is MSU has benefited greatly from the TV money and we would be by far the least desirable school in the league athletically and academically without it.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Covington, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,295
    vCash
    700722589
    Quote Originally Posted by Turfdawg67 View Post
    Man, if I don't get to see college football this year, and specifically ML & KJC, I will be so bummed. But that would be MSU's luck... highest rated QB ever and never takes a snap.
    Would that not be the most MSU thing ever !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    15,985
    vCash
    2510
    It's amazing to me that some athletic departments actually run at a deficit. Every SEC school should be at a major surplus with a huge emergency/rainy day account. The arms race has finally caught up with everyone it seems.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Gutter Cobreh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,946
    vCash
    2000000000
    Quote Originally Posted by MetEdDawg View Post
    Then the system is flawed and everyone grew too fast and lends credence to the fact that we need all the universities we have to offer diverse options for kids.

    ESPN should not run MSU. Period. But they do because tv dollars fund our growth. Sorry but that's the truth. How did universities survive 30 years ago without these billions of dollars of tv contracts? Just because it's done the way it is now doesn't mean it's right. We've build a model that slips up this easily? That means it's a bad model and needs to be broken down.

    The fact that entertainment and television companies determine whether colleges sink or swim should be blatantly obvious as to how bad that is. Maybe folks have never thought about it like that. But now is the time to do that. Mark Keenum should be the President Of Mississippi State University, not James Pitaro, who is the President of ESPN.
    Spot on! Great post!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.