Quote Originally Posted by bluelightstar View Post
There's really no way to tell. I think the fairest question is do you think Moorhead would've done worse than 21-38 if he had taken over after Jackie, and do you think Croom would have done better than 14-12 if he'd taken over after Mullen? I think the answer is yes to both of those questions.
Croom would have done much worse than 14-12. He'd never have run Fitz, ( look at what he did with Omar Connor) and we would have scored 14 points per game. ( That's half of what Moorhead had) Vroom would have lost at least 2 more games in 2018 ( Probably ULL, A&M, and maybe KState), and in 2019 would have lost to ULL and Ark, probably Ole Miss.

Joe running a version of the spread with Omar, Jerious and Nick would have been better than what Croom did. Mostly due to system fit and letting Omar run the ball and no way Moorhead runs off Nick Turner. That beats Maine, and UAB... Not sure he finds another to get to a bowl... and he probably loses to UF and makes it about even...

It's depressing to look at any more "what it's" from the Croom era

Just thinking about Omar, Jerious, and Nick in a run spread offense is the most depressing "What if"....