Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 56 of 56

Thread: Leach has a history of bad defenses. Should we be worried no DC by now?

  1. #41
    Bennie Brown Know-It-All
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,920
    vCash
    3138
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Will be a fight for 6.

    Leach will learn he is going to have to close the line splits down in the South. If not- he will we will get a heavy dose of inside blitz with DB's taking away the quick slants and such. I'm looking forward to the adjustments and chess matches this Fall
    He scored 24 points on the road at Auburn in year 2 with Washington state talent. He went 7-3 against A&M while at tech. He's not going to change anything because SEC defenses are largely overrated outside of the 3/4 good ones a year.
    Last edited by Jarius; 01-15-2020 at 10:39 PM.

  2. #42
    Senior Member Prediction? Pain.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    720
    vCash
    3100
    Seems like this discussion needs some context.

    Partial list of Texas Tech's national rankings in SP+ and FEI defense (partial because those rankings started in '05 and '07, respectively):

    2005: 17th
    2006: 44th
    2007: 43rd / 59th

    - DC resigns mid-season in 2007; Ruffin McNeill promoted to DC --

    2008: 66th / 52nd
    2009: 14th / 21st

    And now for Washington St.:

    - two years before Leach -

    2010: 102nd / 114th (Yikes . . . .)
    2011: 84th / 92nd

    - Leach hired -

    2012: 70th / 78th
    2013: 62nd / 67th
    2014: 97th / 107th (Yikes . . . .)

    - fired DC, hired Alex Grinch -

    2015: 77th / 38th
    2016: 60th / 42nd
    2017: 30th / 13th

    - Grinch goes to Ohio St. -

    2018: 59th / 79th
    2019: 94th / 107th (Yikes . . . .)

    - DC resigned mid-season in 2019 after debacle of biblical proportions against UCLA -

    Traditional stats tell mostly the same story. In 2009, Leach's Texas Tech D was in the top half of the Big 12 in total D, scoring D, 3rd down d, red zone D, sacks, and TFLs (and in the top 3 in a few of those categories). And under Grinch, WSU's D was mediocre to solid among its Pac 12 peers in most of the same categories. (Top 5 in scoring D in conference games all three years, for example.)

    So it looks like's dude's offense is capable of co-existing with a solid (or even a really, really good) defense. Just got to find the right people to run it.

  3. #43
    Senior Member Prediction? Pain.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    720
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    WSU rankings nationally in plays defended the last 4 years:
    2019 - 72nd
    2018 - 29th
    2017 - 28th
    2016 - 39th

    Leach has done a good job keeping his defense off the field
    Good point, 7. After his first two years at WSU, they were usually either in the middle or in the upper third of the nation in opponents' plays per game.

    Regardless, the difference between the number of plays WSU's D faced and the number that State's D faced wasn't often that large.

    Opponents' plays per game:

    2012: WSU - 76.5 / State - 73
    2013: WSU - 80.2 / State - 66.9
    2014: WSU - 72.8 / State - 77.5
    2015: WSU - 75.6 / State - 76.2
    2016: WSU - 68.7 / State - 72.8
    2017: WSU - 67.3 / State - 62.5
    2018: WSU - 66.8 / State - 65.6
    2019: WSU - 69.8 / State - 64.4
    Last edited by Prediction? Pain.; 01-16-2020 at 10:49 AM.

  4. #44
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,417
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Prediction? Pain. View Post
    Seems like this discussion needs some context.

    Partial list of Texas Tech's national rankings in SP+ and FEI defense (partial because those rankings started in '05 and '07, respectively):

    2005: 17th
    2006: 44th
    2007: 43rd / 59th

    - DC resigns mid-season in 2007; Ruffin McNeill promoted to DC --

    2008: 66th / 52nd
    2009: 14th / 21st

    And now for Washington St.:

    - two years before Leach -

    2010: 102nd / 114th (Yikes . . . .)
    2011: 84th / 92nd

    - Leach hired -

    2012: 70th / 78th
    2013: 62nd / 67th
    2014: 97th / 107th (Yikes . . . .)

    - fired DC, hired Alex Grinch -

    2015: 77th / 38th
    2016: 60th / 42nd
    2017: 30th / 13th

    - Grinch goes to Ohio St. -

    2018: 59th / 79th
    2019: 94th / 107th (Yikes . . . .)

    - DC resigned mid-season in 2019 after debacle of biblical proportions against UCLA -

    Traditional stats tell mostly the same story. In 2009, Leach's Texas Tech D was in the top half of the Big 12 in total D, scoring D, 3rd down d, red zone D, sacks, and TFLs (and in the top 3 in a few of those categories). And under Grinch, WSU's D was mediocre to solid among its Pac 12 peers in most of the same categories. (Top 5 in scoring D in conference games all three years, for example.)

    So it looks like's dude's offense is capable of co-existing with a solid (or even a really, really good) defense. Just got to find the right people to run it.
    I think that's exactly why Leach came to the SEC. It's a lot easier to attract the right people at MSU than it is at a non blue blood in the Big 12 or PAC 12.

    Even in the 90's we were able to attract Joe Lee Dunn. Croom was able to get Ellis Johnson who was very well respected. Dan's two DC hires were Manny Diaz and Todd Grantham who were name DC- at least the second time with Manny. Joe was able to land Bob Shoop. I highly doubt Washington State would pay a DC 1.5 million if not higher. We are just now willing to do it.

    I think we are about to start a new era of MSU football where we are going for higher goals than in the past. 6-6 with an Egg Bowl win and Liberty Bowl bid isn't good enough anymore. Leach may be the perfect guy to lead this. Really a good fit for both in many ways now that I have had time to reflect on it.

    All of our DC candidates are P5 coordinators let rumors. In the past all we would do is go for G5 up and comers and head coaches that were sitting coordinators and hope that we landed Manny Diaz or Geoff Collins and not Joe Moorhead or Peter Sirmon. We basically created a revolving door where we were essentially a stepping stone.

  5. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,728
    vCash
    3168
    I think wins and losses this year have a lot more to do with whether or not we have the QBs and WRs to really make Leach's offense click. As of right now, I would have to say that's a no. So, I tend to side with 34 here. That doesn't mean it's a bad hire. We are going to have to be patient. 2020 will be a struggle, and 2021 will be better. After that, I think we'll be pretty darn competitive. Look at 2020 like 2009. We may not have a great record, but we should see progress in a lot of areas and should feel confident moving forward.

  6. #46
    Senior Member Spiderman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,711
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Some guys are absolutely apprehensive about being the DC for Leach and having to coach 75-80 plays of defensive every Saturday. Hopefully we can get a hungry young guy thats ready to be a DC
    Guy on 6 pack did a study. Over the last 5 years WSU has only defended a half play more than State per game on average. And that was with us leading the nation on 3 and outs on D in 2018.
    Not only did Mississippi State embarrass LSU on this night. Davis Wade Stadium wrecked Tiger Stadium in music choice, atmosphere and, most of all, volume.

    When I'm 80 and deaf, it's not going to be all those Springsteen concerts or Queen at Municipal Auditorium in New Orleans on Halloween Night in 1978, it will be this game...............Glen Guilbeau--Sherveport Times

  7. #47
    Senior Member Saltydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,292
    vCash
    3706
    I agree. His offensive schemes sometime don't exactly eat up a lot of clock and forces your D to spend way more time on the field. I like what he said about off season conditioning because those defensive guys better be in shape or we're in deep trouble in this league.
    "The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)

  8. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    227
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Prediction? Pain. View Post
    Good point, 7. After his first two years at WSU, they were usually either in the middle or in the upper third of the nation in opponents' plays per game.

    Regardless, the difference between the number of plays WSU's D faced and the number thant State's D faced wasn't often that large.

    Opponents' plays per game:

    2012: WSU - 76.5 / State - 73
    2013: WSU - 80.2 / State - 66.9
    2014: WSU - 72.8 / State - 77.5
    2015: WSU - 75.6 / State - 76.2
    2016: WSU - 68.7 / State - 72.8
    2017: WSU - 67.3 / State - 62.5
    2018: WSU - 66.8 / State - 65.6
    2019: WSU - 69.8 / State - 64.4
    That's an average of 2.35 more snaps per game/per season over 8 years which is a really good sample size. That's a very miniscule difference.

  9. #49
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,250
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Spiderman View Post
    Guy on 6 pack did a study. Over the last 5 years WSU has only defended a half play more than State per game on average. And that was with us leading the nation on 3 and outs on D in 2018.
    and 2 of those seasons he had veterans in Minshew and the guy this season moving the offense. Plus, the Pac-12 doesn’t play D like the SEC does.

    The SEC had 6 defenses make the top 20 in scoring in 2019
    Washington State faced 4 this year- going 0-4 and scoring 20 per game. Wash State’s D in those games played 71, 77, 51, and 81 plays of defense. The outlier being Washington game in rainy weather.

    SEC D’s plus a new system are going to make our plays per game on D go up. You can count on it
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  10. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    903
    vCash
    3371
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Gonna be a long Fall for some of you guys. Ya'll expecting a car from Santa and he is bringing you a watch
    How soon before you give Leach a clever nickname?

  11. #51
    Bennie Brown Know-It-All
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,920
    vCash
    3138
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    and 2 of those seasons he had veterans in Minshew and the guy this season moving the offense. Plus, the Pac-12 doesn’t play D like the SEC does.

    The SEC had 6 defenses make the top 20 in scoring in 2019
    Washington State faced 4 this year- going 0-4 and scoring 20 per game. Wash State’s D in those games played 71, 77, 51, and 81 plays of defense. The outlier being Washington game in rainy weather.

    SEC D’s plus a new system are going to make our plays per game on D go up. You can count on it
    He's going to have offensive players with more talent in the sec. That is a wash. No matter how many times you want to repeat the sec has a bunch of great defenses it won't make it any more true. He has faced the same type of defenses his entire career as 75% or more of his sec schedule. You are perpetuating a myth. He's also not playing all 6 of those defenses. He's playing bama and LSU and Auburn. Everyone else on our schedule is what he is used to playing. Kentucky's defense was not good against people with a pulse either. They feasted on shitty teams.
    Last edited by Jarius; 01-16-2020 at 11:28 AM.

  12. #52
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,034
    vCash
    3203452
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    and 2 of those seasons he had veterans in Minshew and the guy this season moving the offense. Plus, the Pac-12 doesn’t play D like the SEC does.

    The SEC had 6 defenses make the top 20 in scoring in 2019
    Washington State faced 4 this year- going 0-4 and scoring 20 per game. Wash State’s D in those games played 71, 77, 51, and 81 plays of defense. The outlier being Washington game in rainy weather.

    SEC D’s plus a new system are going to make our plays per game on D go up. You can count on it

    Well we only have 4 of those on the schedule for 2020 so whatever point you went for there, you made it for the other side. You're telling us Leach will face a similar defensive schedule as he faced in PAC-12. And as others have shown it's a small snaps per game difference between us and Wazzu.

    I'm firmly in the 8-4 is a reasonable goal camp. Schedule is too easy. SEC Defenses ain't what they used to be. early 2010s are gone. It's 2020 now. New Decade, New SEC.

  13. #53
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,250
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by dantheman4248 View Post
    Well we only have 4 of those on the schedule for 2020 so whatever point you went for there, you made it for the other side. You're telling us Leach will face a similar defensive schedule as he faced in PAC-12. And as others have shown it's a small snaps per game difference between us and Wazzu. .
    He also faced 3 defenses lower than 100 in Defense at Wash State. UPig was the only one in the SEC and they will be a little better in 2020 although probably not a lot. Denying the SEC isn’t a much better conference defensively is ridiculous
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  14. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    227
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    He also faced 3 defenses lower than 100 in Defense at Wash State. UPig was the only one in the SEC and they will be a little better in 2020 although probably not a lot. Denying the SEC isn’t a much better conference defensively is ridiculous
    They are. No one should be denying that, but this feels/sounds like a chicken/egg argument. Are the P12 defenses worse because the P12 offenses are better or is it the other way around? Same can be said for SEC Defenses re: SEC offenses.

  15. #55
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,037
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    and 2 of those seasons he had veterans in Minshew and the guy this season moving the offense. Plus, the Pac-12 doesn’t play D like the SEC does.

    The SEC had 6 defenses make the top 20 in scoring in 2019
    Washington State faced 4 this year- going 0-4 and scoring 20 per game. Wash State’s D in those games played 71, 77, 51, and 81 plays of defense. The outlier being Washington game in rainy weather.

    SEC D’s plus a new system are going to make our plays per game on D go up. You can count on it
    Our number of 3 and outs are going down too. You need to count that in. We were so bad on offense. The only reason our Time of possession could go down is that we ran every play clock down.

  16. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    916
    vCash
    3000
    Looking at who WSU played this year and the team's scoring defense ranking:

    New Mexico St.- 129th, Northern Colorado-X, Houston- 113th, UCLA- 117th, Utah-6th, AZ State- 35th, Colorado- 95th, Oregon- 9th, Cal-32nd, Stanford-80th, OR State-106th, Washington- 16th.... Avg. Defense ranking they played= 67th


    Looking ahead to MSU's 2020 scheduled opponents & where they ranked this year in scoring defense:

    New Mexico- 125th, NC State-83rd, UPig-124th, Tulane-56th, Texas A&M-39th, Bama-13th, LSU-33rd, Auburn-17th, Mizzou-15th, UK-14th, Bama A&M-X, Ole Miss-60th..... Avg. Defense ranking we will play= 53rd


    Not just a huge difference. Comparable defenses that are similar ranking style:

    Good defenses-- A&M at 39th to AZ State at 35th...Bama at 13th to Utah at 6th....LSU at 33rd to Cal at 32nd....Auburn at 17th to Oregon at 9th....Mizzou at 15th to Washington at 16th.....Those are 5 defenses that MSU faces next season compared to someone WSU played in 2019 and how the scoring defense rankings compare.


    That leaves 6 defenses left on both schedules: MSU 2020 schedule avg. ranking of those 6 defenses= 77th (this is lowed down because UK was ranked at 14th but didn't include them in the comparable section above because there was no one left on WSU's 2019 schedule that was ranked comparable to 14th)....WSU 2019 schedule avg. ranking of the last 6 defenses= 106th.... That's a 29 place difference but when you're talking about going against the 77th defense vs the 106th defense the fact is they both suck pretty dang bad (we were ranked 73rd this year and we were pretty dern bad).

    ETA: Just FWIW, Leach's avg. PPG against those 5 comparable defenses in 2019 was 23.0 PPG (13 vs Utah, 34 vs AZ State, 35 vs Oregon, 20 vs Cal, and 13 vs Washington).
    Last edited by HailStateSZN19; 01-16-2020 at 12:08 PM.
    #SwingUrSword #HailDamnState

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.