Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 38 of 38

Thread: WS Game 3

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,114
    vCash
    14190
    Here's your ballgame right here. Rosenthal entering with bases juiced

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by Will James View Post
    Here's your ballgame right here. Rosenthal entering with bases juiced
    Bet he throws only fastballs

  3. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,114
    vCash
    14190
    Tie game!! Tune in folks if you aren't.

  4. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,114
    vCash
    14190
    I want it to go 7 so damn bad. Drag on as long as you can season because February is too far away for competitive ball.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    This series has 7 written all over it and this game might go 15 innings

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,114
    vCash
    14190
    Workman cannot be allowed to hit there. Dumb.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by Will James View Post
    Workman cannot be allowed to hit there. Dumb.
    Farrell needs his arm more than his bat especially in a tied game

    Nvm you're right it was dumb

  8. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    ****ing Salty!! Stupid decision to throw to 3rd after Pedroia makes that spectacular play

  9. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    294
    vCash
    3200
    Why was it obstruction when the runner was off the baseline?

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by DapperDawg View Post
    Why was it obstruction when the runner was off the baseline?
    Because Middlebrooks intentionally tripped him

  11. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    294
    vCash
    3200
    Debatable.

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    930
    vCash
    102741
    Crazy ending. Middlebrooks trips Craig (who knows if intentionally) and obstruction is called. Craig scores easy if he doesn't trip. That being said, Craig wasn't in baseline so is that correct call?

  13. #33
    Founder of Summer's Eve
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,447
    vCash
    3663
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg61 View Post
    Because Middlebrooks intentionally tripped him
    How do you know that? The initial baseline when standing on 3rd, was a direct line to home. Craig then initially takes 2 steps back toward 2nd, and then turned toward home over Middlebrooks. If we are going to look at the rules and interpret them correctly, If anything it appreared that he made a move back toward 2nd base, and thus would have to go back and touch 3rd. He was out of the baseline if he was heading home, after his initial move back toward 2nd. I didnt make up the baserunning rules. Should have been out, by running out of base line. Obstruction is a stretch. Could have been Out of base line as well. Let them play.

  14. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by trob115 View Post
    Crazy ending. Middlebrooks trips Craig (who knows if intentionally) and obstruction is called. Craig scores easy if he doesn't trip. That being said, Craig wasn't in baseline so is that correct call?
    They just said intent does not matter. Tough way to end a game but no reason for Salty to make that throw. Dumb dumb dumb decision

  15. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    894
    vCash
    3200
    He also was not "off the baseline" . He had started off the inside of the bag, well within the baseline

  16. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    894
    vCash
    3200
    He didn't take steps back toward second. He turned to look. His foot was right by the bag. Also, while beginning his run toward the plate he was within the dirt, not on the grass. If you watch the replay, you'll see that his head was turned looking for the ball as he started running. His head was not turned to where he could see where Middlebrooks was while starting towards the plate. So implying he was trying to run into him is incorrect

  17. #37
    Founder of Summer's Eve
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,447
    vCash
    3663
    Quote Originally Posted by chainedup_Dawg View Post
    He didn't take steps back toward second. He turned to look. His foot was right by the bag. Also, while beginning his run toward the plate he was within the dirt, not on the grass. If you watch the replay, you'll see that his head was turned looking for the ball as he started running. His head was not turned to where he could see where Middlebrooks was while starting towards the plate. So implying he was trying to run into him is incorrect
    So his initial steps off of 3rd weren't in the direction of 2nd base? Were you even watching the game? If you were you'd know his first movement off of 3rd base was in the direction of 2nd base, and then he turned toward home. Had he gone directly from 3rd to home, there wouldn't have been any player in the way.

    And the dirt has nothing to do with baseline. The baseline in that any case other than a batted ball from home plate, is determined by the player and the straight line from said player to either base. His initial steps changed the baseline and thus interferencee shouldn't have been called, since he altered the baseline to his own detriment.

  18. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    894
    vCash
    3200
    Yes I was watching and again, he took no steps toward second. He slid, stood up, turned to look then started home. You are right in that the runner determines his own baseline. That however, goes against your original argument of him being "out of the baseline". The dirt does not determine the baseline, that is correct also, but as long as a base runner is within the dirt on the baselines going to home or first, you're not going to find an ump that would call him "out of the baseline"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.