Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Crooms 2006 team vs. Mullen's 2016 team - Who wins??

  1. 10-29-2016, 07:36 PM #1
    TaleofTwoDogs
    TaleofTwoDogs is offline
    Senior Member TaleofTwoDogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,534
    vCash
    116183

    Crooms 2006 team vs. Mullen's 2016 team - Who wins??

    I would have to go with Croom's team. At least they didn't allow Div 2 teams to gain 600+ yards of offense.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-29-2016, 07:49 PM #2
    Statecoachingblows**
    Statecoachingblows** is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,171
    vCash
    168239
    Not sure, but one sure loser would be the fans having to watch that game.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-29-2016, 07:49 PM #3
    Quaoarsking
    Quaoarsking is offline
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,225
    vCash
    52060
    Why did you pick 2006? Even though the record didn't improve, that team was a lot more competitive than Croom's first 2 teams.

    Also, the FCS ≠ Division 2.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-29-2016, 07:52 PM #4
    Indndawg
    Indndawg is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,068
    vCash
    3100

    Norwood Would Run for a 10000000 yards

    Quote Originally Posted by TaleofTwoDogs View Post
    I would have to go with Croom's team. At least they didn't allow Div 2 teams to gain 600+ yards of offense.
    and Crooms' teams played hard for him, kinda miss that
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-29-2016, 07:55 PM #5
    Bothrops
    Bothrops is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    9,960
    vCash
    3200
    Dan's team has zero defense

    Croom's team had zero offense

    I'm gonna go with Dan's 2016 by 10 pts.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-29-2016, 08:07 PM #6
    GTHOM
    GTHOM is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    2,119
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Indndawg View Post
    and Crooms' teams played hard for him, kinda miss that
    They played hard 2004-2007. 08 was awful. I think the 2006 team with Anthony Dixon and the defense we had would have a better record than this one
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-29-2016, 08:10 PM #7
    dawgday166
    dawgday166 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    8,817
    vCash
    3100
    nm
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-29-2016, 08:13 PM #8
    BayouDawg
    BayouDawg is offline
    Senior Member BayouDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,899
    vCash
    3100
    If it's late in the year 2006 crooms team then I go with them. They started to gel and boobie was coming into his own down the stretch. We beat Bama and held arky to one offensive touchdown when they had McFadden and Felix Jones.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-29-2016, 08:33 PM #9
    DeputyDawg94
    DeputyDawg94 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    480
    vCash
    3100
    Croom, based solely on defence.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-29-2016, 09:45 PM #10
    tireddawg
    tireddawg is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,026
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Bothrops View Post
    Dan's team has zero defense

    Croom's team had zero offense

    I'm gonna go with Dan's 2016 by 10 pts.
    In order to get 10 we would need a field goal...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-29-2016, 09:49 PM #11
    DownwardDawg
    DownwardDawg is offline
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Covington County Mississippi
    Posts
    10,905
    vCash
    1540588
    Quote Originally Posted by Bothrops View Post
    Dan's team has zero defense

    Croom's team had zero offense

    I'm gonna go with Dan's 2016 by 10 pts.
    This team wouldn't score 10 points on that team.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-29-2016, 09:59 PM #12
    Taog Redloh
    Taog Redloh is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,904
    vCash
    3100
    Idiots!

    2016 would beat 2006 by 2 TDs.

    You. Have. Gone. Beyond. Full. Retard.

    Michael Henig. Please move on from this garbage thread.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-29-2016, 10:01 PM #13
    Taog Redloh
    Taog Redloh is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,904
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Indndawg View Post
    and Crooms' teams played hard for him, kinda miss that
    Norwood wasn't on the 2006 team genius.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-29-2016, 10:09 PM #14
    Political Hack
    Political Hack is offline
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,289
    vCash
    7178
    I'd just like to see Croom's offense against this defense. talking about a battle of complete and utter ineptitude.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-29-2016, 10:15 PM #15
    BB30
    BB30 is offline
    Senior Member BB30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Columbus, Ms
    Posts
    2,127
    vCash
    3523
    Lost minds if y'all think that croom team would win. You can't win if you can't score and that offense was just about as pathetic as this defense.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-29-2016, 11:26 PM #16
    BulldogDX55
    BulldogDX55 is offline
    Senior Member BulldogDX55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,040
    vCash
    2615
    Also, in 2006, they'd have no idea how to defend the spread.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.