-
Hevesey has got to go. O- line gets worse every snap!
17 him and his best "only" friend!
-
I'm tired of watching O linemen miss assignments and/or go the wrong way. It is terrible.
-
Wha? Are you guys freaking kidding me? I thought they gave Fitz plenty of time on most of the snaps. Were there a few times they missed an assignment? Yes, the big hit on D.Will at the end as well as pressure came from the LT position, but Jenkins (starting LT) was NOT IN THERE. They actually did well as the game went on and we had a RB that was bigger than 165lbs,
-
Originally Posted by
Coach 57
Wha? Are you guys freaking kidding me? I thought they gave Fitz plenty of time on most of the snaps. Were there a few times they missed an assignment? Yes, the big hit on D.Will at the end as well as pressure came from the LT position, but Jenkins (starting LT) was NOT IN THERE. They actually did well as the game went on and we had a RB that was bigger than 165lbs,
Agree. Fitz had time most of the night. And our 200+ lb RB's did fine.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach 57
Wha? Are you guys freaking kidding me? I thought they gave Fitz plenty of time on most of the snaps. Were there a few times they missed an assignment? Yes, the big hit on D.Will at the end as well as pressure came from the LT position, but Jenkins (starting LT) was NOT IN THERE. They actually did well as the game went on and we had a RB that was bigger than 165lbs,
Exactly.
-
They ****ing sucked tonight. Really sucked. #62 and #55 nearly got our qb's killed.
-
One of you football guys help me.
Which is our bigger OL problem?
1. Schemes/Technique
2. Recruited talent level
-
Originally Posted by
ScottH
One of you football guys help me.
Which is our bigger OL problem?
1. Schemes/Technique
2. Recruited talent level
Not sure but ... Louisville had 4 - 3* and 1 unranked on OL today. They looked pretty decent to me against a D line that ate OM up 2 weeks ago. How'd Louisville's O-line look to you?
-
Originally Posted by
Bothrops
They ****ing sucked tonight. Really sucked. #62 and #55 nearly got our qb's killed.
So you noticed this too. I was starting to think I was the only blind one on this board LOL. And #55 was a 4* Juco All-American I believe (2 years ago).
-
Originally Posted by
dawgday166
Not sure but ... Louisville had 4 - 3* and 1 unranked on OL today. They looked pretty decent to me against a D line that ate OM up 2 weeks ago. How'd Louisville's O-line look to you?
I'm to lazy to look it up but does our OL even have as many *'s as Louisville.
Regardless some kind of change needs to be made.
-
Originally Posted by
ScottH
I'm to lazy to look it up but does our OL even have as many *'s as Louisville.
Regardless some kind of change needs to be made.
More
ETA: Cancel change ... ain't nuthin changing.
-
Originally Posted by
ScottH
One of you football guys help me.
Which is our bigger OL problem?
1. Schemes/Technique
2. Recruited talent level
Little of both. Desper is a weak link. Hes not rufus warren bad but hes the worst one. I thought they had a pretty good night tonight all things considered. It would help if their head coach would help them out and keep riding his bigger horses and not his pony.
-
A lot of both. That we even had to convert Warren from TE to LT (most important OL position) says it all about our lack of recruiting and coaching at the position. Same goes with having to convert Smokey to CB.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach 57
Wha? Are you guys freaking kidding me? I thought they gave Fitz plenty of time on most of the snaps. Were there a few times they missed an assignment? Yes, the big hit on D.Will at the end as well as pressure came from the LT position, but Jenkins (starting LT) was NOT IN THERE. They actually did well as the game went on and we had a RB that was bigger than 165lbs,
Can you give me your opinion on this? I thought most of the sacks we allowed tonight were because we held on to the ball too long. I may be off on that but I would like to hear your thoughts on that because that's what it seemed like to me from the stands.
I can't believe we didn't have our starting LT in the game on the last play.
-
Originally Posted by
ScottH
One of you football guys help me.
Which is our bigger OL problem?
1. Schemes/Technique
2. Recruited talent level
Talent if I had to pick between those two options. I don't think our o-linemen are mean enough though- remember Dillon Day and Ben Beckwith? We need more guys like that.
-
I should know but who was in on that last play at LT?
-
Originally Posted by
ScottH
I'm to lazy to look it up but does our OL even have as many *'s as Louisville.
Regardless some kind of change needs to be made.
We probably do have more stars than they do thanks to Martinas Rankin.
The star system right now is really a three level system even though they have five levels.
5 means you are elite and college ready on day one in their opinion
4 means you are a high end player that will probably be a starter over the course of your career.
3 is pretty much everyone else that they have looked at that they don't think is a high end player. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean that they think you suck it's just that they don't expect you to contribute or start until you are a junior or senior. That includes (probably) Louisville's guys and our guys other than Rankin.
2 really means that they haven't looked at your film but you committed to someone so that's what you are until they figure it out.
1 means you're dead. I can't remember ANYONE that was a one star. They'll give you a NR rating before they give you a one or even two star rating normally.
-
Originally Posted by
Goldendawg
I should know but who was in on that last play at LT?
I assume Rankin.
-
Oline is simply not the problem, it's an excuse
-
Originally Posted by
TimberBeast
Oline is simply not the problem, it's an excuse
We have issues at every position group on offense.
No QB.
No RB.
Lack of length at the WR position.
Inexperienced TE's.
Hevesy coached o-line.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.