Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: One thing I'm noticing with the BearSharks right now

  1. #1
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,615
    vCash
    17200

    One thing I'm noticing with the BearSharks right now

    They are trumpeting the "9 schollys over 3 years" narrative to anybody that will listen.

    This is what they need to understand- that is what OM is trying to self-impose and they are hopeful the NCAA accepts that. But here's the problem- There's no guarantee whatsoever the NCAA will accept that.

    The NCAA didnt accept the 4 game suspension on Tunsil OM offered up- they made it 7.
    The NCAA didnt accept the 1 yr suspension we offered for Redmond- they added 5 more games.

    The 9 over 3 is the OM offer to the NCAA- I'll be shocked if they accept that.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,819
    vCash
    3200
    I think they need a post season ban to really feel like they've taken a hit

  3. #3
    Senior Member PassInterference's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,910
    vCash
    3200

  4. #4
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,180
    vCash
    4975
    9 over 3 is peanuts for the level of infractions they have. I'm sure the NCAA is laughing at that. That's like saying I robbed the bank but I want house arrest for 3 years.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Lafayette, La
    Posts
    3,048
    vCash
    2620
    13 violations and at least some being level I and they think they will only get 9 schollys? I just don't see how that's possible

  6. #6
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    if they only get scholly hits, they will laugh and keep doing what they've been doing. This year's class should be banned from postseason play for at least 3-4 years in order for it to actually hurt them IMO. If you allow that class to play in bowls, you haven't sent a message at all. Bc they have enough talent now to breeze through 3-4 years without missing a beat in terms of wins & losses. Interrupt that, make them feel like what they did set them back, or else you fail. That's my message to the NCAA

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    521
    vCash
    4700
    For my information, what level was Redmond's? I hope less than level 1.

  8. #8
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    if they only get scholly hits, they will laugh and keep doing what they've been doing. This year's class should be banned from postseason play for at least 3-4 years in order for it to actually hurt them IMO. If you allow that class to play in bowls, you haven't sent a message at all. Bc they have enough talent now to breeze through 3-4 years without missing a beat in terms of wins & losses. Interrupt that, make them feel like what they did set them back, or else you fail. That's my message to the NCAA
    Agree completely

    Rosebowl comes on OOB at 8:45. We can find out what's going on then.

    Hopefully, Bo asks him directly about a 2nd letter
    Last edited by ShotgunDawg; 02-10-2016 at 09:40 AM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,666
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Boodawg View Post
    For my information, what level was Redmond's? I hope less than level 1.
    Redmond was under old guidlines which basically was major or secondary violations. That case had 2 major and one minor. But under the new levels, level 1 and 2 are the same as major violations.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,694
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    9 over 3 is peanuts for the level of infractions they have. I'm sure the NCAA is laughing at that. That's like saying I robbed the bank but I want house arrest for 3 years.
    9 scholarships over 3 years is peanuts for any level of infractions. By the time fall camp rolls around, we ourselves will have lost around 10 scholarships over the last 2 years just due to attrition and not filling all our spots in the 2016 class. Nothing even NCAA related. If they get anything less than 5 scholarships per year over 3 or 4 years plus at least a one year postseason ban, then all the cheating they have done would have been worth it and then some.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    190
    vCash
    3200
    Bounds keeps saying that the most important goal for UNM is to protect Freeze due to his coaching and recruiting abilities. Doesn't he understand that the NOA is a byproduct of his "recruiting abilities"? He's selling snake oil to recruits. He wouldn't have anywhere near the success he's had if he didn't pay insert long list of 4* and 5* players to come to UNM. He might be a good coach, but the delusion behind their fan base that he is who he says he is (insert Dennis Green) is comical.

  12. #12
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Rosebowl says with 100% accuracy that the investigation is "on going" but instead of a 2nd letter, there will be addendums added to the current allegations.

    You have to already be under sanctions for the "repeat violator" criteria to come into play.
    Last edited by ShotgunDawg; 02-10-2016 at 09:56 AM.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    if they only get scholly hits, they will laugh and keep doing what they've been doing. This year's class should be banned from postseason play for at least 3-4 years in order for it to actually hurt them IMO. If you allow that class to play in bowls, you haven't sent a message at all. Bc they have enough talent now to breeze through 3-4 years without missing a beat in terms of wins & losses. Interrupt that, make them feel like what they did set them back, or else you fail. That's my message to the NCAA
    Just get them on probation and into the repeat offender watch list for a few years. Anything the NCAA is likely to do to them this go round won't slow them up, we all know that. When they get caught again, and with the way they operate now they will, then the boom gets lowered. Remember, it was the second go round that nailed SMU to the wall, not the first.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3,422
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    They are trumpeting the "9 schollys over 3 years" narrative to anybody that will listen.

    This is what they need to understand- that is what OM is trying to self-impose and they are hopeful the NCAA accepts that. But here's the problem- There's no guarantee whatsoever the NCAA will accept that.

    The NCAA didnt accept the 4 game suspension on Tunsil OM offered up- they made it 7.
    The NCAA didnt accept the 1 yr suspension we offered for Redmond- they added 5 more games.

    The 9 over 3 is the OM offer to the NCAA- I'll be shocked if they accept that.
    So they think they'll get less than ULL even though the investigation that got ULL in trouble started with them? And, ULL didn't have 28 violations covering 3 sports either.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    101,296
    vCash
    3800
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    if they only get scholly hits, they will laugh and keep doing what they've been doing. This year's class should be banned from postseason play for at least 3-4 years in order for it to actually hurt them IMO. If you allow that class to play in bowls, you haven't sent a message at all. Bc they have enough talent now to breeze through 3-4 years without missing a beat in terms of wins & losses. Interrupt that, make them feel like what they did set them back, or else you fail. That's my message to the NCAA
    Agree-they have to be made to feel it and their recruits to notice. Postseason is the best way to do that.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Beaver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    634
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Rosebowl says with 100% accuracy that the investigation is "on going" but instead of a 2nd letter, there will be addendums added to the current allegations.

    You have to already be under sanctions for the "repeat violator" criteria to come into play.
    Just to be clear.. Is Rosebowl saying for certainty there will not be a second letter?

  17. #17
    Senior Member QuadrupleOption's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    882
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenheadDawg View Post
    13 violations and at least some being level I and they think they will only get 9 schollys? I just don't see how that's possible
    It depends on whether the football violations have any level 1 status attached to them. We won't know until they leak it or actually release the NOA. I do seem to recall that of the four levels the NCAA now uses, NONE of them fall to level 4, which is incidental violations.

    And there's no way in Hell the Tunsil items are less then a level 2. But I guess we'll see when we actually get to read the entire notice.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,753
    vCash
    4114
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    They are trumpeting the "9 schollys over 3 years" narrative to anybody that will listen.

    This is what they need to understand- that is what OM is trying to self-impose and they are hopeful the NCAA accepts that. But here's the problem- There's no guarantee whatsoever the NCAA will accept that.

    The NCAA didnt accept the 4 game suspension on Tunsil OM offered up- they made it 7.
    The NCAA didnt accept the 1 yr suspension we offered for Redmond- they added 5 more games.

    The 9 over 3 is the OM offer to the NCAA- I'll be shocked if they accept that.


    It still baffles me how they went from not knowing anything about an investigation to experts on every detail on each charge and what the penalties will be

  19. #19
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,615
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by jumbo View Post
    It still baffles me how they went from not knowing anything about an investigation to experts on every detail on each charge and what the penalties will be
    yep. They are Nazi-like with their propaganda
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  20. #20
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,666
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by QuadrupleOption View Post
    It depends on whether the football violations have any level 1 status attached to them. We won't know until they leak it or actually release the NOA. I do seem to recall that of the four levels the NCAA now uses, NONE of them fall to level 4, which is incidental violations.

    And there's no way in Hell the Tunsil items are less then a level 2. But I guess we'll see when we actually get to read the entire notice.
    Level 4 will never be mentioned in any NOA. They are the only true minor and inconsequential infractions. Only Level 1, 2, or 3 are ever mentioned in a NOA. Levels 1 & 2 are both major infractions and both have postseason ban, probation, scholarship reductions, etc as part of their penalties. Level 3 can get to Level 2 or even 1 with enough of them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.