Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Bracky has to go

  1. #1
    Senior Member starkvegasdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Eye of the Storm
    Posts
    22,777
    vCash
    3275

    Bracky has to go

    The NCAA just handed down their penalties to OK State for all they were doing in the SI story from back in 2013. One year probation, a small fine, and minor recruiting restrictions. NCAA went on to call most of the SI article false. OSU did far worse than us and gets a slap on the wrist. Further proof if you don't just hand over your proof on a silver platter the NCAA can't do anything. They get off lighter than us for all they did and we have one of our best players lose almost half his career due to a PE teacher masquerading as a compliance officer.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    4,175
    vCash
    2069649
    After seeing the difference in the way the NCAA deals with us, it appears that most peoples disdain for our compliance department is misdirected.

    Our president DEMANDS that the image of the university not be damaged in the media. Which means with regard to sports that bad eggs and dirty laundry are dealt with swiftly and harshly to prevent outside bodies from crucifying us over long periods of time.

    Just a guess, but it appears Brackey deals with issues in compliance EXACTLY in the way the president expects. I think the ire should be directed at him if at all.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    774
    vCash
    3760
    Quote Originally Posted by gravedigger View Post
    After seeing the difference in the way the NCAA deals with us, it appears that most peoples disdain for our compliance department is misdirected.

    Our president DEMANDS that the image of the university not be damaged in the media. Which means with regard to sports that bad eggs and dirty laundry are dealt with swiftly and harshly to prevent outside bodies from crucifying us over long periods of time.

    Just a guess, but it appears Brackey deals with issues in compliance EXACTLY in the way the president expects. I think the ire should be directed at him if at all.
    If this is truly the case then why didn't Keenum fire Cohen after the practice jersey situation? Or at the very least suspend him? Matters not who made them, it's Cohen's responsibility to know what his players are wearing. Talk about damage in the media. But I don't believe it to be the case. I don't believe for a minute Keenum said 'hey Brackey, let's suspend Will Redmond for 18 games. I know Ha Ha Clinton Dix did much worse and only got a half game suspension, but we are Mississippi State. We will set the standard in suspending star cornerbacks!'

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by Original48 View Post
    If this is truly the case then why didn't Keenum fire Cohen after the practice jersey situation? Or at the very least suspend him? Matters not who made them, it's Cohen's responsibility to know what his players are wearing. Talk about damage in the media. But I don't believe it to be the case. I don't believe for a minute Keenum said 'hey Brackey, let's suspend Will Redmond for 18 games. I know Ha Ha Clinton Dix did much worse and only got a half game suspension, but we are Mississippi State. We will set the standard in suspending star cornerbacks!'
    Was there a cuss word on the practice jerseys cause I didn't see one?

  5. #5
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    The anger towards Bracky is so misguided. You can not like him but he's doing exactly what Keenum & Stricklin want. It's not like Bracky is going out on his own & dealing with the NCAA. Also the Cohen situation isn't comparable at all. Adidas took the blame for that so why would he suspend Cohen? Please it's been 4yrs can we let this go?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,752
    vCash
    3700
    No.

  7. #7
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    19,292
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    The anger towards Bracky is so misguided. You can not like him but he's doing exactly what Keenum & Stricklin want. It's not like Bracky is going out on his own & dealing with the NCAA. Also the Cohen situation isn't comparable at all. Adidas took the blame for that so why would he suspend Cohen? Please it's been 4yrs can we let this go?
    If Keenum and Stricklin really think having a former HS football coach run our compliance department is the best approach, then they are even more clueless about the modern day workings of the NCAA and its infraction committee than even Bracky is.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    774
    vCash
    3760
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    The anger towards Bracky is so misguided. You can not like him but he's doing exactly what Keenum & Stricklin want. It's not like Bracky is going out on his own & dealing with the NCAA. Also the Cohen situation isn't comparable at all. Adidas took the blame for that so why would he suspend Cohen? Please it's been 4yrs can we let this go?
    I was being facetious about firing Cohen...it was in response to the post of how 'demanding' our president is in controlling our image in the media. By the way I do think Cohen should know/approve of/be responsible for what our players are wearing and representing on the field at all times. But to the the original point...I just for the life of me don't get why every compliance department in the sec employs lawyers and former NCAA compliance officials at the highest levels of their university's compliance and we have Brackey.
    Last edited by Original48; 04-26-2015 at 04:02 PM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    19,292
    vCash
    3700
    delete

  10. #10
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Quote Originally Posted by Original48 View Post
    I was being facetious about firing Cohen...it was in response to the post of how 'demanding' our president is in controlling our image in the media. By the way I do think Cohen should know/approve of/be responsible for what our players are wearing and representing on the field at all times. But to the the original point...I just for the life of me don't get why every compliance department in the sec employs lawyers and former NCAA compliance officials at the highest levels of their university's compliance and we have Brackey.
    Adidas marketing was on campus that week. It's totally possible & likely they hand delivered those batting shirts themselves & our guys just put them in the locker.
    I don't disagree about who should be over compliance I'm just saying the hate that most have for Bracky is misguided. He's just doing what his bosses want him to do.

  11. #11
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    19,292
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    I don't disagree about who should be over compliance I'm just saying the hate that most have for Bracky is misguided. He's just doing what his bosses want him to do.
    Maybe so, but another point is that Bracky has been operating how he operates long before Keenum and Stricklin took over. I tend to think Keenum and Stricklin have just been content to just let him do compliance the only way he knows to do it rather than shake things up.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    4,175
    vCash
    2069649
    Quote Originally Posted by Original48 View Post
    If this is truly the case then why didn't Keenum fire Cohen after the practice jersey situation? Or at the very least suspend him? Matters not who made them, it's Cohen's responsibility to know what his players are wearing. Talk about damage in the media. But I don't believe it to be the case. I don't believe for a minute Keenum said 'hey Brackey, let's suspend Will Redmond for 18 games. I know Ha Ha Clinton Dix did much worse and only got a half game suspension, but we are Mississippi State. We will set the standard in suspending star cornerbacks!'
    1. Who says Keenum hasn't dealt with the situation ? Why didn't he fire him? Because he's not some uninformed jerk who reads message board threads as his source of info.
    2. That's right. We are MSU. We are not Alabama and don't have their coach or president.
    3. Believe what you want. But know this. Keenum sees the athletic program differently than the average fan. He can't stop situations like Redmond or the Adidas shirts. But he can demand his people respond in a way that mitigates the damage. Neither of those situations is the worst he has had to deal with.

    There will never be a two year bs NCAA investigation under his watch that damages the university. The name of the compliance officer will not matter. Whomever it is, will do exactly as told, and in that absence, exactly as expected.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Reason2succeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,066
    vCash
    2610
    The way that Will Redmond was treated is a classic example of the injustice in collegiate sports.

    The college, Okie State in this instance, gets a slap on the wrist for major involvement. Probation, fines, and scholarship restriction are easy to get over. Heck, while at USC Lane Kiffin LITERALLY laughed at their punishment and said that it would not affect anything in the program.

    On the other hand, the player, like Will Redmond loses eligibility that they will NEVER get back. This is his one shot to make it to the pros and his opportunity is MAJORLY hampered. I'm not saying that he shouldn't be punished. He should. But losing eligibility for a player ought to be akin to a death penalty for a university.
    Death penalty or bust!!!***

  14. #14
    Senior Member FlabLoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    3,648
    vCash
    3330
    Don't forget Chizik openly mocking the NCAA in front of an NCAA member and a group of coaches & media. That was near the close of the Cam Newton "investigation".

  15. #15
    Senior Member thf24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,543
    vCash
    3200
    I'm not sure exactly what happened in the Okie State case, but the difference between ours and most others you hear about is that we had a member of the coaching staff caught red-handed with direct involvement in the incident. Had it been strictly a booster tied to it, we probably would have come out similarly to how these other schools we point to when complaining about Bracky. But as it was, I think we should actually consider ourselves lucky, because it could have a hell of lot worse.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    546
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    The anger towards Bracky is so misguided. You can not like him but he's doing exactly what Keenum & Stricklin want. It's not like Bracky is going out on his own & dealing with the NCAA. Also the Cohen situation isn't comparable at all. Adidas took the blame for that so why would he suspend Cohen? Please it's been 4yrs can we let this go?
    The anger towards him, possibly, could be misguided but the fact is he is not qualified to handle his position in modern day college athletics. It is past time either Keenum or Stricklin move him somewhere and bring in a qualified person.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    101,296
    vCash
    3800
    I hate to bring up Renardo Sidney because he tore our basketball program up, but the fact is they investigated his father to the hilt, while Cam Newton went scot free (and Auburn) because his father taking money had "no affect" on Cam.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,607
    vCash
    10296
    I also question his credentials and our approach to compliance (I really don't know the back story of how he was hired), but at the same time I have no evidence that it's fundamentally harming the athletic program. The Will Redmond situation was not handled well at all, but what's the impact today? I don't see any major areas that we've been held back here in terms of recruiting or keeping players eligible so I'd speculate that it's unlikely we'll see any changes.

  19. #19
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    19,292
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by MrKotter View Post
    The anger towards him, possibly, could be misguided but the fact is he is not qualified to handle his position in modern day college athletics. It is past time either Keenum or Stricklin move him somewhere and bring in a qualified person.
    That's my whole contention. I don't hate Bracky Brett. I just think he's woefully unqualified with his background for the job he's doing. He has NO legal background, NO former dealings with NCAA matters prior to becoming our compliance director, and as far as I know he had not even been experienced in college administration OR college athletics prior to getting on board with us. From what I've read Bracky was a HS head football coach and administrator at the relatively small school of Hamilton and then took an assistant football coaching job at Starkville HS prior to coming on board in compliance at MSU. How does that background qualify anyone in this day and age to run a compliance department at an SEC school?

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,977
    vCash
    203638
    Quote Originally Posted by dawgoneyall View Post
    No.
    A very loud echo of NO here too as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.