-
Graham's muffed punt
It may have been discussed already, if so I apologize. I thought watching live that maybe an Aggie touched the ball first and therefor the ball becomes dead at that spot, yet we had no review of the play and I said to myself, well I guess it was obvious who touched the ball first. Now, after watching the recording I'm positive that the ball hit the ground then bounced up and into an Aggie's face mask. Anyone else see this?
-
Originally Posted by
DanDority
It may have been discussed already, if so I apologize. I thought watching live that maybe an Aggie touched the ball first and therefor the ball becomes dead at that spot, yet we had no review of the play and I said to myself, well I guess it was obvious who touched the ball first. Now, after watching the recording I'm positive that the ball hit the ground then bounced up and into an Aggie's face mask. Anyone else see this?
I haven't watched replay, but it looked like it hit the Aggie player first and should have been dead ball, from where I was standing. Of course no review of the play and A&M ran a quick play. Good job SEC crew once again. I thought they missed the JRob "fumble" as well. He never really had possession and didn't make a football move before it was knocked loose.
-
Have to remember at the time A&M was the higher ranked team and the one to be protected.
-
Senior Member
The ball definitely hit the aggie player first. I thought it was pretty obvious on the replay in the stadium. My question is why Mullen would not challenge it himself. I would think Graham would know for sure who touched it first and could relay that to him. I know it was early in the game, but after they had scored so fast the last thing I would want is to give the ball up so deep in our territory. Looking back it didn't make a shit, but it coulda been a big tilt in the game.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
monroedawg5646
The ball definitely hit the aggie player first. I thought it was pretty obvious on the replay in the stadium. My question is why Mullen would not challenge it himself. I would think Graham would know for sure who touched it first and could relay that to him. I know it was early in the game, but after they had scored so fast the last thing I would want is to give the ball up so deep in our territory. Looking back it didn't make a shit, but it coulda been a big tilt in the game.
Yeah one of the replay angles definitely looked like it showed the ball hitting an Aggie first. My thought was that Graham wasn't aware that it had hit the Aggie. He looked upset with himself directly after the play so I don't think he realized that he wasn't the first to touch the ball. No coach is gonna throw out a challenge flag if their player is feeling guilty for the play unless it was completely obvious.
-
Senior Member
Ball hit the Aggie. If we challenge the call, we win it. Graham was telling Mullen to challenge it if you saw their body language after the play. If you're Mullen, you have to throw the flag there. No excuse. Luckily no harm no foul because our defense was bad ass there but you have to challenge it.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
aerodawg
Yeah one of the replay angles definitely looked like it showed the ball hitting an Aggie first. My thought was that Graham wasn't aware that it had hit the Aggie. He looked upset with himself directly after the play so I don't think he realized that he wasn't the first to touch the ball. No coach is gonna throw out a challenge flag if their player is feeling guilty for the play unless it was completely obvious.
I disagree. He looked like he thought it touched the Aggie first. I was surprised we didn't challenge it based on Graham's body language. We must have seen different games. Anyway, the coaches should have immediately told Mullen to throw the flag there.
-
Originally Posted by
monroedawg5646
The ball definitely hit the aggie player first. I thought it was pretty obvious on the replay in the stadium. My question is why Mullen would not challenge it himself. I would think Graham would know for sure who touched it first and could relay that to him. I know it was early in the game, but after they had scored so fast the last thing I would want is to give the ball up so deep in our territory. Looking back it didn't make a shit, but it coulda been a big tilt in the game.
My thoughts exactly! I would also agree that at the time of the game a&m was the higher ranked team, and I have to agree with Starkvegasdawg about the league protecting them!
-
Originally Posted by
RougeDawg
I thought they missed the JRob "fumble" as well. He never really had possession and didn't make a football move before it was knocked loose.
It was a close call and I'm not going to judge. My issue is that if JRob's was a fumble, so was the TAMU player's later in the game, or vice versa. The difference probably came down to the weight carried by the call on the field, but still, it was practically the same thing and some consistency there would have been nice.
-
Member
Exactly, couldn't believe it wasn't reviewed.
-
My thought that the aggie was too close, and should have been flagged for interfering with the catch..
-
Senior Member
The muffed punt was the right call. Just watched the replay several times.... The ball hit Graham's fingertips first.
-
Originally Posted by
DanDority
It may have been discussed already, if so I apologize. I thought watching live that maybe an Aggie touched the ball first and therefor the ball becomes dead at that spot, yet we had no review of the play and I said to myself, well I guess it was obvious who touched the ball first. Now, after watching the recording I'm positive that the ball hit the ground then bounced up and into an Aggie's face mask. Anyone else see this?
You are correct.
-
I watched it last night finally. I disagree. From one angle I thought it was pretty clear that Graham did not touch the ball AT ALL much lest first.
The Liberation will not be televised--- when it arrives like lightning in the skies!
-
Originally Posted by
Barking 13
My thought that the aggie was too close, and should have been flagged for interfering with the catch..
That was my thoughts exactly. You have to give the receiving team room to make the catch.
-
Originally Posted by
RougeDawg
I haven't watched replay, but it looked like it hit the Aggie player first and should have been dead ball, from where I was standing. Of course no review of the play and A&M ran a quick play. Good job SEC crew once again. I thought they missed the JRob "fumble" as well. He never really had possession and didn't make a football move before it was knocked loose.
The JROB fumble was close enough to go either way, but no way they could call that a fumble and be consistent with calling essentially the same play later an incomplete pass when it happened to A&M. Both were completely clear from the replay; it's only a matter of consistently applying the rule.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Johnson85
The JROB fumble was close enough to go either way, but no way they could call that a fumble and be consistent with calling essentially the same play later an incomplete pass when it happened to A&M. Both were completely clear from the replay; it's only a matter of consistently applying the rule.
I agree.
But for the record, I hate the way the rulebook interprets catches. If you have control and a foot on the ground, I think its a catch no matter what happens a half second later when you drop the ball because somebody hit you or the ball comes out when you body lands on the ground. "The ground can't cause a fumble, but it can case an incompletion" is BS.
That said, Robinson & that A&M guy experienced the same thing "catching" the ball and quickly fumbling. They called J-Rob's a fumble and the A&M one an incompletion. That was..
-
Banned
Jamoral was at our tailgate after the game and told us that the ball grazed his arm on the way down. He felt it hit him first.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.