Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: MSU vs. OM recruiting strategy

  1. #1
    Senior Member The Croom Diaries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Jawja
    Posts
    1,074
    vCash
    3905

    MSU vs. OM recruiting strategy


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,127
    vCash
    2610
    I really do think our class is a little underrated. We have some nice players. But Ole Miss definitely has the superior class this year.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Sam&DeansDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    163
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time View Post
    I really do think our class is a little underrated. We have some nice players. But Ole Miss definitely has the superior class this year.
    They're prolly bout to lose a couple also.
    ?I didn't dare think of the future; the past was still happening.? - John Grisham

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,127
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam&DeansDawg View Post
    They're prolly bout to lose a couple also.
    Don't think they are losing Speaks.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Sam&DeansDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    163
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time View Post
    Don't think they are losing Speaks.
    It could happen.
    ?I didn't dare think of the future; the past was still happening.? - John Grisham

  6. #6
    Senior Member messageboardsuperhero's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,209
    vCash
    3700
    Damn good article. I enjoyed that.

    Do I wish we could get some more highly rated players? Absolutely, but Mullen and co. have been recruiting better than people give them credit for.

  7. #7
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,095
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time View Post
    I really do think our class is a little underrated. We have some nice players. But Ole Miss definitely has the superior class this year.
    Ole Miss' top 10 HS commitments:

    1. Hampton
    2. Taylor
    3. Speaks
    4. Webster
    5. McDowell
    6. Pack
    7. Epps


    State's top 10:

    1. Green
    2. Williams
    3. Graham
    4. Staley
    5. Bryant
    6. Jackson
    7. Cooper

    I may be biased, but I don't see theirs as far better than ours. And both classes drop off a good bit after those top 7.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,853
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Ole Miss' top 10 HS commitments:

    1. Hampton
    2. Taylor
    3. Speaks
    4. Webster
    5. McDowell
    6. Pack
    7. Epps


    State's top 10:

    1. Green
    2. Williams
    3. Graham
    4. Staley
    5. Bryant
    6. Jackson
    7. Cooper

    I may be biased, but I don't see theirs as far better than ours. And both classes drop off a good bit after those top 7.
    4 points I would say in response to this:

    1. Those are 7 recruits for each team, not top 10.

  9. #9
    Senior Member LiterallyPolice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    542
    vCash
    3285
    Good article.... I know there is a perpetual debate on recruiting stars, do they matter, etc. But in my view, recruiting is all about "fit". It's like the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

    I'll explain.

    Everyone knows that Donatello's bowstaff is the best weapon on paper. It has the longest reach; it has the perfect mix of versatility and damage. A five-star weapon, one might say. Indeed, anyone who has ever played TMNT on Nintendo would always.... ALWAYS... go with Donatello as their first choice. But does this mean that all of the Ninja Turtles should give up their preferred weapon and pick up the bowstaff? Of course not - can you imagine the smile on Shredder's face when he is approached by Michaelangelo with a bowstaff??? The idea is ludicrous. Michaelangelo will always be most effective with his nunchucks. His skills are augmented by his weapon choice, and vice versa. His skills FIT his weapon.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Matty Dispatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    407
    vCash
    3100
    I always hit myself in the face with Mikey's numb chucks.

    P.S. Article sucked. Had nothing on my piece about how Rick Ray's veteran team is pathetic for not being 18-0. #Dakismediocre

  11. #11
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,636
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    4 points I would say in response to this:

    1. Those are 7 recruits for each team, not top 10.
    I laughed

  12. #12
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,095
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    4 points I would say in response to this:

    1. Those are 7 recruits for each team, not top 10.
    Hahaha. I was going to do 10, then decided to stop at 7 and never edited. Well played, sir.

  13. #13
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,095
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by LiterallyPolice View Post
    Good article.... I know there is a perpetual debate on recruiting stars, do they matter, etc. But in my view, recruiting is all about "fit". It's like the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

    I'll explain.

    Everyone knows that Donatello's bowstaff is the best weapon on paper. It has the longest reach; it has the perfect mix of versatility and damage. A five-star weapon, one might say. Indeed, anyone who has ever played TMNT on Nintendo would always.... ALWAYS... go with Donatello as their first choice. But does this mean that all of the Ninja Turtles should give up their preferred weapon and pick up the bowstaff? Of course not - can you imagine the smile on Shredder's face when he is approached by Michaelangelo with a bowstaff??? The idea is ludicrous. Michaelangelo will always be most effective with his nunchucks. His skills are augmented by his weapon choice, and vice versa. His skills FIT his weapon.
    That's a great analogy, but forget the bowstaff. He had a stick as a weapon. Sure, it has nice range and in a video game setting where each weapon does the same damage with one hit, sure it's great. In reality, though, Leonardo is obviously better equipped than the rest. It's why no one can ever claim Leonardo as their favorite Ninja Turtle; it's obvious, it isn't a fair fight for the rest.

    Though my favorite will always be Michelangelo anyway.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,673
    vCash
    3700
    For us, we need a good mix of "four star talent" and diamonds in the rough. And a lot of those diamonds in the rough really probably shouldn't be if these recruiting services actually took the time to really evaluate them- see McKinney and Chris Jones before he blew up.

    Dan's recruiting philosophy has lead to the best run we've had since the late 90's- and I really think we are going to get the big fruits of that labor over the next two years.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,650
    vCash
    17200
    State's recruiting?

    We are about to put the best defense on the field we have had since 1999 when we finished 1st in the nation. Nobody will be surprised if we have a top 10 defense next year- that means our defensive recruiting has been phenomenal.

    We have a QB being mentioned along with the Heisman trophy.
    We will have JRob and 2 four-star RB's
    We may have the best TE group in the SEC
    Questions about WR and the OL have to be answered. We'll see how much we develop guys here.

    Offensive recruiting? C+

    Overall, I give recruiting a B....we could use some more playmakers of offense, but overall our recruiting has been good.

    Look at the close games we lost:

    LSU 2009- had Tyson Lee at QB
    Auburn 2010- needed a playmaker on O
    UPig 2010- one of our playmakers fumbled in OT
    LSU 2011- needed playmaker on offense. D played well
    SC 2011- needed a playmaker on O to score just 3 more points

    2013? Had a young team. I think we'll see in 2014 and 2015 these young guys from 2013 are indeed playmakers
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,607
    vCash
    10296
    The link is broken for me, couldn't find this. Can someone point me in the right direction?

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,697
    vCash
    13463
    look at the recruiting classes this way.... as of today

    QB's. Advantage Dogs
    RB. Advantage Dogs
    OL. Advantage bear sharks
    TE. Push
    WR. Advantage Dogs. (JJ and Graham>Pack)
    LB. Advantage Dogs
    ST. Push
    DL. Advantage Bear sharks. as of today this may change
    DB. Slight advantage Bear sharks

    looks like 4-3-2 in favor of Dogs...So everyone just chill a little
    Last edited by Coach34; 01-23-2014 at 09:37 PM.

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    15,396
    vCash
    165086
    nailed it croom!! Outstanding!

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,607
    vCash
    10296
    I tell my kids this all the time: hard work beats talent in nearly everything. Talent will always be a factor, but for anything that matters you'll have to put the work in. Those that work harder get the most out of the talent. It's just that simple. Let's keep recruiting the "lunch pail" guys that want to come in here and work their tails off, seems to be working and Mullen is doing a fantastic job.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    9,960
    vCash
    3200
    I'm not convinced that their class is any better overall. Time will tell.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.